The latest on the Trump impeachment inquiry

11:21 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

Justice Department will give redacted FBI memos from Mueller probe to House for the impeachment inquiry

The Justice Department said it has agreed to give the House 33 FBI memos from the Robert Mueller investigation for use in the impeachment inquiry.

Here's the thing: The documents have redactions “to protect confidential communications between senior White House advisers,” DOJ attorney Elizabeth Shapiro said. 

Judge Howell responded with incredulity, pointing out that the White House appeared to be keeping confidential from the House information that was widely available within the FBI. Shapiro responded that it was not widely shared within the FBI.

11:19 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

House lawyer: "We're getting almost nothing" from Justice in the impeachment inquiry

Former White House counsel Don McGahn attends the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Sept. 4, 2018.
Former White House counsel Don McGahn attends the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Sept. 4, 2018. Ting Shen/Xinhua/Getty Images

A lawyer for the House of Representatives told a federal judge that “we’re getting almost nothing” from the Justice Department for the impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

House General Counsel Doug Letter told a federal judge this morning that the Justice Department has refused to share FBI memos on what former White House Counsel Don McGahn and other White House employees told Special Counsel Robert Mueller about the President’s attempts to obstruct justice.

The memos go to “the very heart of what we need to look into” in the current impeachment inquiry, Letter told Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court Tuesday.

The House has seen no FBI interview notes (so-called 302s) from McGahn or his deputy Annie Donaldson or of “others in the White House, despite saying they need them and the Justice Department agreeing to share some of the memos with the House.

The House has seen “nowhere near” what it thought it would see after the Mueller investigation.

“We’re getting almost nothing" Letter said.

Meanwhile, the House is arguing in court that it’s “fully engaged” in the impeachment inquiry and it didn’t need a formal vote to start that proceeding.

Federal Judge Beryl Howell is pressing the House over what protected information the House may gain access to at this time through the court.

The hearing comes the same morning the Trump administration has begun to stonewall the House’s impeachment inquiry because it hasn’t passed a resolution to formalize it — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had only announced the inquiry.

The Justice Department has not yet told the judge its arguments in the ongoing court hearing.

10:42 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

Sen. Lindsey Graham invites Rudy Giuliani to testify

Sen. Lindsey Graham extended an invitation to President Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify about Ukraine.

In a tweet, Graham said he has "heard on numerous occasions disturbing allegations by [Giuliani] about corruption in Ukraine."

Graham added: "Given the House of Representatives’ behavior, it is time for the Senate to inquire about corruption and other improprieties involving Ukraine."

Asked by CNN about the invite, Giuliani responded:

“Love Lindsey, but I am still a lawyer and I will have to deal with privilege.”

CNN asked if Giuliani thinks Trump would waive attorney-client privilege and release him to testify. Giuliani has not yet responded.

Why are we talking about Giuliani here: Giuliani has been vocal since the Ukraine scandal broke, claiming that he has dirt on Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. Earlier this month, Giuliani first denied then admitted in an interview on CNN that he asked Ukrainian officials to investigate Joe Biden. Important to note, there is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe Biden or his son.

Giuliani has also been among the people pushing a theory that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election through “collusion” with Democrats.

10:34 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

White House Counsel's office consulted with State Department to block testimony

The White House Counsel's office consulted with the State Department to block Ambassador Gordon Sondland’s testimony today.

Why this matters: This is a clear sign that the White House counsel’s office is directing other government agencies.

9:52 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

Pompeo ignores questions about blocking testimony

CNN
CNN

During a photo op of his meeting with the Estonian foreign minister, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo ignored a shouted question about why he blocked Ambassador Sondland’s testimony today.

9:47 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

Key GOP congressman: Sondland isn't testifying because Democrats are running an "unfair and partisan process"

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, arrives at the Capitol in Washington, on Thursday, October 3.
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, arrives at the Capitol in Washington, on Thursday, October 3. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Rep. Jim Jordan, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, said Republicans understand why the Trump administration's State Department blocked Ambassador Gordon Sondland's testimony today.

"It’s based on the unfair and partisan process that Mr. Schiff has been running," Jordan said, referencing House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff.

"You think about what the Democrats are trying to do: Impeach the President of the United States 13 months prior to an election, based on an anonymous whistleblower with no firsthand knowledge who has a bias against the President," Jordan said.

Jordan added that Republicans were "looking forward" to the testimony.

Some context about Jordan's comments: Republicans have repeatedly criticized the whistleblower for lacking firsthand knowledge of the conduct outlined in the complaint. But the intelligence community inspector general has pushed back on that criticism, and has made clear that the whistleblower was not simply communicating secondhand knowledge.

The "possible political bias" mentioned — and then dismissed — in the Intelligence Community Inspector General report refers to the fact that the whistleblower is a registered Democrat. The intelligence community's inspector general, Michael Atkinson, said that regardless of the possible bias, the complaint appeared to be credible.

10:23 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

Blocking Sondland testimony is "additional strong evidence of obstruction," Schiff says

House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff speaks at a press conference at the US Capitol on Tuesday, October 8 in Washington.
House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff speaks at a press conference at the US Capitol on Tuesday, October 8 in Washington. Win McNamee/Getty Images

House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff said both Congress and the American people are "being deprived" of US Ambassador Gordon Sondland's testimony today.

Earlier today, Sondland's lawyer said the Trump administration's State Department ordered him not to appear before Congress.

Schiff said Sondland has "text messages or emails on a personal device" the committee would like to see.

"Although we have requested those from the ambassador, and the State Department is withholding those messages as well," Schiff said. “Those messages are also deeply relevant to this investigation and the impeachment inquiry.”

Schiff continued:

"The failure to produce this witness, the failure to produce these documents we consider yet additional strong evidence of obstruction of the constitutional functions of Congress.
9:35 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

Trump tweets that he would "love" for Sondland to testify, but doesn't trust "kangaroo court"

President Trump tweeted that if he allowed EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland to testify today, it would be in front of a "a totally compromised kangaroo court."

This comes after reports that the White House is blocking Sondland from testifying today in the impeachment inquiry.

What's this all about: A source familiar with discussions inside President Trump’s impeachment team says Ambassador Sondland not appearing is “part of an overall strategy connected to what is viewed as irregularities in the House impeachment inquiry.”

9:49 a.m. ET, October 8, 2019

58% of Americans support Trump impeachment inquiry, new poll says

President Donald Trump talks to journalists on the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, October 4.
President Donald Trump talks to journalists on the South Lawn of the White House, Friday, October 4. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

A majority of Americans support the impeachment inquiry, according to a new Washington Post-Schar school poll.

The Post reported that 58% of those surveyed said they support the House inquiry, while 38% oppose it.

Meanwhile, 49% said they support the inquiry and removing Trump from office. Another 6% said they support the inquiry but oppose removing Trump.

Here's more context from the Washington Post:

"The findings indicate that public opinion has shifted quickly against the president and in favor of impeachment proceedings in recent weeks as information has been released about Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukrainian government officials to undertake an investigation into former vice president Joe Biden, a potential 2020 campaign rival, and Biden’s son Hunter.Those numbers back up other recent polls conducted about impeachment."