Richard Bensinger, left, who is advising unionization efforts, along with baristas Casey Moore, right, Brian Murray, second from left, and Jaz Brisack, second from right, discuss their efforts to unionize three Buffalo-area stores, inside the movements headquarters on Oct. 28, 2021 in Buffalo, N.Y. The National Labor Relations Board is scheduled to count ballots Thursday, Dec. 9, 2021, from union elections held at three separate Starbucks stores in the Buffalo area. Around 111 Starbucks workers from the three stores were eligible to vote by mail starting last month.
Starbucks employees at New York store vote to unionize (2021)
02:06 - Source: CNNBusiness
Beijing/ Hong Kong CNN Business  — 

Starbucks is facing its second controversy in China in two months, over what the coffee giant has described as a “misunderstanding” between its staff and a police officer.

The incident unfolded on Sunday, when the beverage chain said that four police officers visited one of its stores in the southwestern city of Chongqing.

They “arranged to have dinner in the outdoor dining area, [but] later, there were other customers who wanted to have dinner [there],” Starbucks (SBUX) said in a statement on Monday.

“There was a misunderstanding in the communication between the staff and the police officer because of inappropriate words [used] when coordinating the seating,” the company said. “We apologize for it.”

But word of the incident quickly spread, with critics suggesting online that the exchange had escalated further and that Starbucks had ejected the police from its premises.

The news became a trending topic on Chinese Twitter-like platform Weibo this week, generating more than 200 million views. On Monday, even Chinese state media responded.

“Starbucks, please take back your arrogance,” People’s Daily, a state-run newspaper, wrote in a commentary published on Weibo. “Who gives [Starbucks] the power to arbitrarily expel police on duty eating dinner in front of the store?”

Starbucks denied the accusation, saying in its statement on Weibo that no police officer had been expelled from the cafe.

The US-based company has faced scrutiny in the vast Chinese market lately, after an investigation by a state-backed newspaper published last December found that two of its stores had used expired ingredients.

That situation caused a similar frenzy on Chinese social media, and forced Starbucks to order inspections and a retraining of staff at every store in the country. The company also made a public apology at the time.

The latest firestorm comes amid a delicate time for foreign businesses in China. In its commentary Monday, People’s Daily appeared to take note of that, addressing critics who might take aim at Starbucks for being an American company.

“There’s no need to overemphasize Starbucks as a foreign company. It’s also inexcusable if local companies expel police,” the newspaper wrote.

Hu Xijin, the well-known former editor of state-run tabloid Global Times, also sought to calm tensions, saying in a Weibo post on Monday that “the friction between Starbucks and the police should be preliminarily defined as an individual incident.”

“I would also advise people not to blame the entire Starbucks company, [and] especially not to label [it as a] ‘foreign brand’ in this incident,” he added, noting that Starbucks had apologized and that it would not be “conducive to” helping China display a sense of openness to foreign businesses.

China is Starbucks’ second biggest market. The chain employs more than 66,000 people in the country, and made $897 million there in the three months ended January, according to its most recent earnings report.