CNN
Now playing
04:21
Poll shows support for impeachment remains steady
FLINT, MI - OCTOBER 31: Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a drive-in campaign rally for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at Northwestern High School on October 31, 2020 in Flint, Michigan. Biden is campaigning with former President Obama on Saturday in Michigan, a battleground state that President Donald Trump narrowly won in 2016. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Drew Angerer/Getty Images North America/Getty Images
FLINT, MI - OCTOBER 31: Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a drive-in campaign rally for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden at Northwestern High School on October 31, 2020 in Flint, Michigan. Biden is campaigning with former President Obama on Saturday in Michigan, a battleground state that President Donald Trump narrowly won in 2016. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Now playing
00:54
Obama slams GOP's opposition to voting reform
CNN
Now playing
02:39
NY candidate says he's joining forces with his opponent. Here's why
Now playing
03:36
Local election officials to be ousted after Georgia governor signs law
Now playing
02:34
Schumer on infrastructure talks: We need big, bold change
CNN
Now playing
03:14
This family's lives will be changed by the child tax credit
CNN
Now playing
02:46
Toobin on Supreme Court ruling: I was struck by Kavanaugh's opinion
Getty Images
Now playing
02:47
Enten: Straw poll of GOP activists rates DeSantis over Trump
jake sullivan russia sanctions bash sotu vpx_00000000.png
jake sullivan russia sanctions bash sotu vpx_00000000.png
Now playing
01:48
Sullivan: US preparing more Russia sanctions over Navalny poisoning
cnn/getty images
Now playing
01:55
Sanders won't say if he'll support Manchin's voting rights compromise
President Joe Biden speaks about reaching 300 million COVID-19 vaccination shots, in the State Dining Room of the White House, Friday, June 18, 2021, in Washington.
Evan Vucci/AP
President Joe Biden speaks about reaching 300 million COVID-19 vaccination shots, in the State Dining Room of the White House, Friday, June 18, 2021, in Washington.
Now playing
01:31
'A private matter': Biden on US Catholic bishops' potential rebuke
Critical Race Theory
KSDK
Critical Race Theory
Now playing
04:39
Mom gets emotional during heated forum on critical race theory
FILE - This June 8, 2021 file photo shows the Supreme Court building in Washington. A Thursday, June 17, 2021 Supreme Court ruling that favored Catholic Social Services in Philadelphia was far from the constitutional gale wind that would have reshaped how courts interpret religious liberty under the First Amendment. Governmental entities are now on notice that if they want to ban discrimination against LGBTQ persons or anyone else, they had better not allow for any exceptions -- or else religious groups will have the right to ask for them, and they'll have a strong case for getting them. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
FILE - This June 8, 2021 file photo shows the Supreme Court building in Washington. A Thursday, June 17, 2021 Supreme Court ruling that favored Catholic Social Services in Philadelphia was far from the constitutional gale wind that would have reshaped how courts interpret religious liberty under the First Amendment. Governmental entities are now on notice that if they want to ban discrimination against LGBTQ persons or anyone else, they had better not allow for any exceptions -- or else religious groups will have the right to ask for them, and they'll have a strong case for getting them. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Now playing
03:32
Obamacare has survived over 2,000 attempts to kill it
mike pence heckled at conservative conference vpx _00000918.png
CNN
mike pence heckled at conservative conference vpx _00000918.png
Now playing
02:21
Mike Pence heckled at conservative conference
This Morning
Now playing
03:22
Ted Cruz: Critical race theory is as racist as Klansmen
YouTube/Department of Justice
Now playing
03:56
New video shows police getting punched during Capitol riot

Editor’s Note: Charlie Firestone is the executive director of the Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program. The opinions expressed in this commentary are his own. View more opinion at CNN.

CNN —  

The evidence is mounting daily that President Donald Trump may have committed an impeachable offense in withholding aid to Ukraine as he sought an investigation that would aid his reelection campaign. But with our polarized political system and split party control of Congress – many think impeachment is inevitable in the House, but conviction unattainable in the Senate – we need an alternative to impeachment. And luckily we have one.

Charlie Firestone
Pattie Firestone
Charlie Firestone

After amassing the testimony and preparing for the articles of impeachment, the House could change course and introduce a resolution for censure of the President. In it, they would recite all the behavior that would go into articles of impeachment. But instead of Trump’s removal from office as a remedy, it would essentially place the impeachment process in abeyance until the House can determine whether it will be able to hear from additional key witnesses.

This is a viable option for many reasons.

As the Democrats make their point that the President’s behavior is unacceptable, the Republicans and the President continue to say that this impeachment inquiry is just another desperate attempt by Democrats to get Trump out of the White House after Robert Mueller’s investigation.

So far, several key witnesses have refused to come forward to testify, and some, like John Bolton, have gone to federal court to determine if they must comply with congressional subpoenas over and above a White House order not to testify. A federal judge ruled this week that there is no blanket immunity for officials from a congressional subpoena, but the administration is appealing the ruling. This will take time that the House does not seem willing to wait for.

Even more concerning, though, is that after this process runs its course, it will be extremely difficult as a practical matter for the House to go through an impeachment process for anything the President does in the future, at least in the current term. It is unlikely the populace would stand for another round of divisive impeachment proceedings, as an ongoing matter, unless there is an extremely serious and obvious charge (such as direct evidence of taking bribes as was the case with Vice President Spiro Agnew in the early 1970s).

Complicating the process is that with questions being raised about Vice President Mike Pence’s possible involvement in the Ukraine scandal, the presidential line of succession becomes more of a focus. Next would be the speaker of the House, and our House speaker is a member of the opposing party. The GOP-controlled Senate may be even less inclined to move forward with removal from office in an impeachment when a “President Nancy Pelosi” is possible.

A censure would issue a formal warning: This is unacceptable behavior for a president, but we will not remove you from office this time. However, pending further testimony or should there be any instance of further wrongdoing, the appropriate remedy is removal from office. Ideally, the Senate would also adopt a resolution of censure, though support for Trump and the politics of the upcoming election would suggest that that is highly unlikely.

This is not a new notion. A censure was proposed in earlier stages of the process by AEI’s Norman Ornstein and Boston Globe columnist Scot Lehigh, among others. It essentially places a marker of condemnation pending a further possibility of bringing an impeachment.

Additionally, and as part of the legislative negotiations, Congress could use this occasion to amend the Presidential Succession Act to change the line of succession. Recognizing the potential conflict of interest of an opposing party removing the president and vice president, Congress could change the line of succession after the vice president from the speaker of the House to the highest ranking member of the House from the same party as the president. That way, any semblance of partisan motivations or charges of a “coup” would be removed by allowing the elected party to stay in office throughout the presidential term.

By amending the line of succession, Republicans could rest assured that, going forward, should impeachment arise again, they would not lose the presidency.

The Democrats would be hard-pressed to pull back from full impeachment. Censure could be seen as a slap on the wrist, and a failure of their leadership to prove what they and their constituencies believe have been abuses of the presidency.

But that is what compromise is made of – common ground, and a spirit of working together in the future. A recent CNN poll showed that 50% of the country believes that President Trump should be impeached. This number hasn’t changed since a mid-October poll. With the public now apparently locked into their opinions on impeachment after two weeks of public testimony, this resolution could be a way out of a mess for both parties.

Get our free weekly newsletter

Ultimately, Congress would be on record condemning the clear wrongdoing by the President, warning of further misconduct which could make new proceedings acceptable. But it would not be issuing the “death penalty” of removal from office, yet. It also shows patience in possibly awaiting a court resolution of congressional authority to subpoena executive branch officers. And it allows future behavior to be the subject of reopening impeachment hearings.