trump border wall explainer animation orig nws_00003622.jpg
trump border wall explainer animation orig nws_00003622.jpg
Now playing
02:34
What it would take to build Trump's border wall
ORLANDO, FLORIDA - FEBRUARY 27:  Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), participates in a discussion on the Right to Bear Arms during the Conservative Political Action Conference held in the Hyatt Regency on February 27, 2021 in Orlando, Florida. Begun in 1974, CPAC brings together conservative organizations, activists, and world leaders to discuss issues important to them. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
ORLANDO, FLORIDA - FEBRUARY 27: Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), participates in a discussion on the Right to Bear Arms during the Conservative Political Action Conference held in the Hyatt Regency on February 27, 2021 in Orlando, Florida. Begun in 1974, CPAC brings together conservative organizations, activists, and world leaders to discuss issues important to them. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Now playing
04:13
GOP lawmaker defiant of Covid rules as cases spike in her district
Now playing
02:36
This is the man leading the No. 1 fundraising effort in sham Arizona audit
Three interpreters who have applied for Special Immigrant Visas talked to CNN about how urgent it was for them to leave Afghanistan due to threats from the Taliban. CNN is concealing their identity for their protection.
Provided to CNN
Three interpreters who have applied for Special Immigrant Visas talked to CNN about how urgent it was for them to leave Afghanistan due to threats from the Taliban. CNN is concealing their identity for their protection.
Now playing
04:28
Taliban hunting down Afghan allies as US withdrawal continues
Now playing
03:33
Report: GOP Rep. Brooks wore body armor during speech on January 6
White House/CNN
Now playing
00:46
Pelosi: To say not wearing a mask is based on science is not wise
CNN
Now playing
03:35
See why this restaurant owner has been targeted by Marjorie Taylor Greene
CNN
Now playing
01:39
'It sucks, man': Capitol officer details hate received
Now playing
04:48
See GOP lawmaker's reaction when he's confronted over insurrection remarks
Washington Metropolitan Police Department officer Michael Fanone watches as a video being displayed during the House select committee hearing on the Jan. 6 attack on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 27, 2021.
Jim Lo Scalzo/AP
Washington Metropolitan Police Department officer Michael Fanone watches as a video being displayed during the House select committee hearing on the Jan. 6 attack on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 27, 2021.
Now playing
02:35
See how right-wing networks covered January 6th hearing
sen boxer
CNN
sen boxer
Now playing
02:55
Senator recounts being attacked in broad daylight
CNN
Now playing
02:20
'You guys won': GOP lawmaker tearfully addresses Capitol officers
Church of Glad Tidings
Now playing
01:16
Reporter calls out Flynn's comment after being given an AR-15
CNN/Getty Images
Now playing
02:50
Carl Bernstein: Trump is our own American war criminal
Now playing
01:35
Republican governor balks at Covid-19 mandates as state's cases soar
Dr. Fauci NIH research China Tapper sotu vpx _00023404.png
CNN
Dr. Fauci NIH research China Tapper sotu vpx _00023404.png
Now playing
03:13
Dr. Fauci weighs in on if US should collaborate with Wuhan labs in future
CNN —  

A federal judge in California ruled against the Trump administration on Friday in two different cases, ultimately preventing $2.5 billion in federal funds from being used for a border wall in portions of California, New Mexico and Arizona.

In the first case, US District Court for Northern California ruled in favor of a challenge to President Donald Trump’s attempt to move billions from the Defense Department budget toward building a border wall in El Centro, California, and New Mexico.

Trump’s move was done as part of his national emergency declaration in February.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra – who has led a group of states in a separate lawsuit against the administration’s push for border wall funding – celebrated the decision Friday, which he said permanently stops the administration from proceeding with construction on the wall.

“These rulings critically stop President Trump’s illegal money grab to divert $2.5 billion of unauthorized funding for his pet project,” Becerra said. “All President Trump has succeeded in building is a constitutional crisis, threatening immediate harm to our state. President Trump said he didn’t have to do this and that he would be unsuccessful in court. Today we proved that statement true.”

The Department of Justice declined to comment to CNN on the rulings. CNN has also reached out to the White House.

Judge Haywood Gilliam determined in the ruling that “no new factual or legal arguments persuade the Court that its analysis” in May to block funds from going to a border wall is incorrect. As a result, “plaintiffs’ likelihood of success on the merits has ripened into actual success,” he added.

In a second lawsuit against the administration brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, Gilliam ruled against the administration a second time.

He ruled that the administration was instructed to keep from “taking any action to construct a border barrier” on the six border sites addressed in the lawsuit.

Gilliam determined in the ruling that the environmental rights groups demonstrated that they would “suffer irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests” should a border wall be built. He added that lawmakers properly addressed immigration in their proposed border funding bill to end the shutdown.

“Congress considered all of Defendants’ proffered needs for border barrier construction, weighed the public interest in such construction against Defendants’ request for taxpayer money, and struck what it considered to be the proper balance – in the public’s interest – by making available only $1.375 billion in funding, which was for certain border barrier construction not at issue here,” he wrote.

Dror Ladin, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s National Security Project who argued the case, said in a statement that “Congress was clear in denying funds for Trump’s xenophobic obsession with a wasteful, harmful wall.”

“This decision upholds the basic principle that the President has no power to spend taxpayer money without Congress’ approval,” he added. “We will continue to defend this core principle of our democracy, which the courts have recognized for centuries.”

CORRECTION: This story has been updated to reflect the judge’s Friday ruling instructed the administration to keep from “taking any action to construct a border barrier” on six border sites in California, New Mexico and Arizona, and that California Attorney General Xavier Becerra led a group of states in a separate lawsuit involving border funding.