William Barr, nominee to be US Attorney General, testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, January 15, 2019.
William Barr, nominee to be US Attorney General, testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, January 15, 2019.
PHOTO: SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
Now playing
02:16
Who is Attorney General William Barr?
Now playing
03:19
Some GOP lawmakers are defying Capitol security measures
PHOTO: CNN
Now playing
01:17
Sen. Romney: Senate trial after Trump leaving office is constitutional
PHOTO: CNN
Now playing
03:25
Biden's HHS secretary pick: If we do this, we will get the pandemic under control
Now playing
07:26
'What research did you do?': Brown presses GOP lawmaker on election fraud claims
PHOTO: CNN
Now playing
01:42
Acosta describes covering last day of Trump administration
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 06: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) attends a press conference with Rep. Andy Levin (D-MI) about their new bill called the EV Freedom Act on Capitol Hill on February 6, 2020 in Washington, DC. The EV Freedom Act is a plan to create a nation wide charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 06: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) attends a press conference with Rep. Andy Levin (D-MI) about their new bill called the EV Freedom Act on Capitol Hill on February 6, 2020 in Washington, DC. The EV Freedom Act is a plan to create a nation wide charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
PHOTO: Samuel Corum/Getty Images
Now playing
03:35
Rioter charged with threatening to 'assassinate' Ocasio-Cortez, officer
Now playing
02:41
Loyal Texas Trump voters want Biden to be less divisive
Now playing
01:16
Sen. Patrick Leahy doubles as a Batman actor
Now playing
01:33
Chuck Schumer announces timeline for Trump impeachment
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 22: U.S. President Joe Biden signs an executive order as Vice President Kamala Harris looks on during an event on economic crisis in the State Dining Room of the White House January 22, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden spoke on his administration
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 22: U.S. President Joe Biden signs an executive order as Vice President Kamala Harris looks on during an event on economic crisis in the State Dining Room of the White House January 22, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden spoke on his administration's response to the economic crisis that caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and signed two executive orders. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
PHOTO: Alex Wong/Getty Images North America/Getty Images
Now playing
02:31
Biden zeroes in on the teetering economy in first week
White House senior adviser Kevin Hassett speaks with reporters at the White House, Friday, June 19, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
White House senior adviser Kevin Hassett speaks with reporters at the White House, Friday, June 19, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
PHOTO: Alex Brandon/AP
Now playing
05:08
Ex-Trump official who supports Biden stimulus plan speaks out
Dick Durbin 0122
Dick Durbin 0122
PHOTO: CNN
Now playing
01:41
Sen. Durbin: We can't pass anything without bipartisanship
JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MARYLAND - JANUARY 20: President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews before boarding Air Force One for his last time as President on January 20, 2021 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump, the first president in more than 150 years to refuse to attend his successor
JOINT BASE ANDREWS, MARYLAND - JANUARY 20: President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews before boarding Air Force One for his last time as President on January 20, 2021 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump, the first president in more than 150 years to refuse to attend his successor's inauguration, is expected to spend the final minutes of his presidency at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. (Photo by Pete Marovich - Pool/Getty Images)
PHOTO: Pete Marovich/Pool/Getty Images
Now playing
04:20
Former top administration officials lobby to convict Trump
Guard Soldiers were ordered to move from the cafeteria to the parking garage
Guard Soldiers were ordered to move from the cafeteria to the parking garage
PHOTO: Obtained by CNN
Now playing
01:42
Photos show National Guard confined to parking garage
mccarthy
mccarthy
Now playing
04:18
McCarthy contradicts himself on Trump's role in insurrection
(CNN) —  

Special counsel Robert Mueller has closed his investigation into Russian meddling, and Attorney General William Barr will inform Congress about Mueller’s findings.

The big question now is exactly how much Barr is going to reveal. Anything short of a complete tell-all is sure to disappoint Democrats.

In a letter to lawmakers Friday, Barr said that he is reviewing Mueller’s report and suggested he will provide “principal conclusions as soon as this weekend.” A Justice Department official said those conclusions are expected to be made public.

Here’s what Barr must consider:

What do Justice Department rules say?

There are federal rules that dictate how a special counsel operates and how Barr should handle Mueller’s report. This is only the second case where these rules will be put to the test – the first time was 20 years ago when a special counsel investigated the deadly siege in Waco, Texas.

The regulations say Mueller should give Barr a “confidential report” explaining why he charged some people and didn’t prosecute others. Barr is then required to notify Congress that he received that report from Mueller. But there isn’t anything in the regulations that directs Barr to issue a final, comprehensive report of his own – or to release Mueller’s confidential report.

As they decide what information to provide to the public, Justice Department officials will be influenced by additional regulations and internal policies that address disclosures like this.

The Justice Manual, a collection of internal Justice Department guidelines, lays out a number of policies for situations like these.

It says that “prosecutors should remain sensitive to the privacy and reputation interests of uncharged third-parties.” The manual points to a series of court decisions establishing that there is “no legitimate government interest served” by publicizing damaging information about someone who isn’t facing charges.

But federal rules say that there could be exceptions. It all turns on whether additional public information is necessary “in the interest in the fair administration of justice and the law enforcement process.” Barr and the deputy attorney general, currently Rod Rosenstein, are the only people at the Justice Department with the power to grant these one-time exceptions.

Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill have clamored that the Russia investigation fits these special circumstances. They won’t be satisfied if Barr only sends an executive summary of sorts.

Last week, the House of Representatives voted unanimously in favor of a non-binding resolution that called for the Mueller report to be released to the public upon completion. President Donald Trump echoed the sentiment on Wednesday, telling reporters he had blessed the House Republicans’ move to join Democrats on the vote, adding, “Let it come out, let people see it.”

What has Barr said?

At his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill earlier this year, Barr promised “transparency.”

“I also believe it is very important that the public and Congress be informed of the results of the special counsel’s work,” Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “My goal will be to provide as much transparency as I can consistent with the law.”

He continued, “I can assure you that where judgments are to be made, I will make those judgments based solely on the law and I will not let personal, political or other improper interests influence my decision.”

But as the hearing went on, senators from both parties prodded Barr for details. He gave himself lots of wiggle room, making it clear he would take whatever Mueller produced and write his own report. He also said the Justice Department shouldn’t “unload negative information” on uncharged people.

The bottom line is that if Democrats want to see Mueller’s work, then Barr’s comments suggest they’ll need to put up a fight. House Democrats say they’re ready with subpoenas and lawsuits, if necessary.

What have others said about this?

Barr isn’t alone in alluding to a more tempered report than some might want. Right there with him is Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller in 2017 and oversaw most of his investigation. At a recent event, Rosenstein invoked the need for “sensitivity to the rights of uncharged people.”

“If we aren’t prepared to prove our case beyond a reasonable doubt in court, then we have no business making allegations against American citizens,” Rosenstein said at a DC think tank last month.

The deputy attorney general made the point even more explicitly two years ago in a letter recommending that Trump terminate then-FBI Director James Comey.

Rosenstein slammed Comey’s decision to give a long-winded and extremely detailed press conference after the Hillary Clinton email investigation was closed in July 2016. Rosenstein wrote that “it is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not do to.”

“(Comey) ignored another longstanding principle: we do not hold press conferences to release derogatory information about the subject of a declined criminal investigation,” Rosenstein wrote.

For his part, Comey has defended the move to release the information, which included a line designating Clinton and her staff’s handling of classified information as “extremely careless.”

During those controversial remarks in 2016, Comey said his public statement was “unusual” but warranted. He said he divulged “more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest.”

In a report released last year, the Justice Department’s internal watchdog determined that Comey’s move “was inconsistent with Department policy and violated long-standing Department practice and protocol by, among other things, criticizing Clinton’s uncharged conduct.”