In the ongoing – and sometimes vicious – vaccination debates online, pediatricians who are vocal vaccine advocates have become frequent targets of anti-vaxers.
Dr. Paul Offit keeps a fat folder of nasty messages he’s received so that “if someone kills me, my wife can give it to the police.” He does not laugh when he says this.
“Rot in hell you baby killer,” one Facebook user wrote in an email to Offit, who is director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
“Go [f**king] kill yourself,” another wrote.
Dr. Peter Hotez at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston is a vaccine researcher and pediatrician who wrote a book about his daughter called “Vaccines did not Cause Rachel’s Autism.”
“You have no morals whatsoever and you know that you are a [f**king] liar. I hope you rot in hell,” one anti-vaxer emailed Hotez, a professor of pediatrics and dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor.
A CNN investigation published on Tuesday revealed such online attacks have become a growing part of the online vaccination debate.
Yet it turns out that the anti-vax sentiments frequently made on Facebook tend to remain consistent in their messaging and arguments – but are diverse, as they often fit within four distinct subgroups, according to a study published in the journal Vaccine on Thursday.
Those subgroups are: distrust of the medical community and public health officials; questions about the content of vaccines and whether there are alternative options for immunity; concerns about the safety of vaccines and their effectiveness; and conspiracy theories, such as views that the poliovirus does not exist, according to the study.
Decoding anti-vax content on Facebook
The study was inspired by Kids Plus Pediatrics, an independent pediatric care practice in Pittsburgh, which posted a video on Facebook in August 2017 about how it offers the human papillomavirus vaccine. About a month after the video was posted, anti-vaccination comments appeared in response to the video.
The comments were so inflammatory that, in the new study, researchers decided to take a closer look and analyze the accounts behind the comments.
Some of the comments claimed the HPV vaccine kills people, and that the pediatric practice should stop seeing patients, given their vaccine promotion efforts, said Beth Hoffman, a graduate student at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health and a researcher with the university’s Center for Research on Media Technology and Health, who was first author of the study.
“There’s been some previous work looking at the content of anti-vaccine messages within Facebook groups and then more broadly on the internet. … But no one yet has done what we did in this paper, looking at the individual profile pages and actual people,” Hoffman said.
“One thing that is important to be thinking about is these anti-vaccine messages are spreading rapidly,” she said. “These very vocal anti-vaxers are extreme, but we have this full spectrum of people who are vaccine hesitant. They are now being exposed to all this information on social media that can be very persuasive.”
The study included data on 197 individual Facebook accounts among those that made anti-vax comments on the HPV vaccine video posted by Kids Plus Pediatrics on Facebook in 2017. The researchers assessed publicly available content made by each account on the social media platform.
The researchers found that the majority of the accounts, 89%, identified as women and, among those who divulged their location, the accounts represented 36 states and eight other countries. While anti-vaccination posts on the accounts’ Facebook profile pages were diverse, the content tended to cluster into four distinct subgroups relating to trust, alternative options, safety, and conspiracies.
“Individuals from around the globe who are opposed to vaccination are connecting via social media, suggesting the need for clinicians and researchers to develop interventions to combat the propagation of misinformation about vaccines on social media,” the researchers wrote in the study.
The study had some limitations, including that the sample of Facebook accounts in the research does not necessarily reflect the entire anti-vax community online, and more research is needed to determine whether similar findings would emerge among a larger sample.
“We only looked at a portion of people who responded to a pro-vaccine video,” Hoffman said. “It would be important to look at more people.”
The data in the study also only involved publicly available content from Facebook. “We didn’t go in and friend these people and see what they were sharing,” Hoffman said.
‘Facebook is now a key disseminator’
Overall, the study confirms that Facebook is an element of the anti-vaccine movement, “which is now first and foremost its own media empire with almost 500 misinformation websites,” said Hotez, who was not involved in the new research.
“The study confirms that Facebook is now a key disseminator for those misinformation websites,” he said.
Facebook announced earlier this month that it plans to reduce the spread of vaccine-related misinformation in its news feed and search options by lowering the ranking of groups and pages that make false claims on its platform.
However, Hotez said the social media giant could do more, such as removing groups and pages that spread misinformation. Some people argue that doing so would be a First Amendment violation.
“Facebook and Amazon are not the US government, they’re private entities,” Hotez said in response. “They’re a leading source of misinformation that is putting children in harms’ way.”
‘I, like many of my colleagues, have been called cynical, a hypocrite, a liar’
Most health care professionals have argued that spreading misinformation about vaccines is harmful because vaccines protect against serious and sometimes deadly diseases – such as polio, tetanus, the flu, whooping cough and measles – so not getting vaccinated can put a person at risk of such illnesses.
When considering this important role that vaccines play in public health, the name-calling and shaming used online in discussions about vaccines can be unproductive, said Dr. Edith Bracho-Sanchez, a practicing pediatrician and a Stanford and CNN Global Health and Media Fellow.
“I, like many of my colleagues, have been called cynical, a hypocrite, a liar, accused of being part of conspiracy, of profiting from vaccines, and – in the best of cases – told I’m just ignorant and unaware,” said Bracho-Sanchez, who was not involved in the new study.
Get CNN Health's weekly newsletter
Sign up here to get The Results Are In with Dr. Sanjay Gupta every Tuesday from the CNN Health team.
“I don’t engage with the individuals who target me in this way because I believe they are looking to insult and be inflammatory rather than to start a conversation,” she said. “I also believe these conversations are not to be had online, where vulnerable parents can fall prey to misinformation, but rather in an office with a trusted provider who parents know have their best interest at heart.”