CNN
Now playing
01:29
Meet Trump's pick for Supreme Court
UNITED STATES - MAY 09:  Brett Kavanaugh is sowrn-in at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on his nomination to be U. S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit.  (Photo By Chris Maddaloni/Roll Call/Getty Images)
Chris Maddaloni/CQ-Roll Call Group/CQ-Roll Call,Inc.
UNITED STATES - MAY 09: Brett Kavanaugh is sowrn-in at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on his nomination to be U. S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit. (Photo By Chris Maddaloni/Roll Call/Getty Images)
Now playing
06:17
Here's what we know about Brett Kavanaugh
WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 15:  Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh walks to a meeting with Se. Joe Donnelly (R-IN) on August 15, 2018 in Washington, DC. Kavanaugh is meeting with members of the Senate after U.S. President Donald Trump nominated him to succeed retiring Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 15: Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh walks to a meeting with Se. Joe Donnelly (R-IN) on August 15, 2018 in Washington, DC. Kavanaugh is meeting with members of the Senate after U.S. President Donald Trump nominated him to succeed retiring Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:29
Trump admin withholds Kavanaugh docs
Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Now playing
01:00
See the times Trump has praised Gorsuch
Getty/AP
Now playing
01:38
Kavanaugh reveals views on Mueller probe
Getty Images
Now playing
01:21
Neil Gorsuch confirmed to supreme court
leahy gorsuch hearing
CNN
leahy gorsuch hearing
Now playing
02:21
Sen. Leahy: Republicans blockaded Garland
Justices of the US Supreme Court sit for their official group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2017. 
Seated (L-R): Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony M. Kennedy, Chief Justice of the US John G. Roberts, Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer. Standing (L-R): Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Samuel Alito Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch. / AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB        (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
Justices of the US Supreme Court sit for their official group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2017. Seated (L-R): Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Anthony M. Kennedy, Chief Justice of the US John G. Roberts, Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer. Standing (L-R): Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Samuel Alito Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch. / AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:16
How are Supreme Court justices chosen?
neil gorsuch sworn in orig alee mobile_00000000.jpg
neil gorsuch sworn in orig alee mobile_00000000.jpg
Now playing
00:52
Trump: Gorsuch appointment is a great honor
Neil Gorsuch, U.S. Supreme Court nominee for U.S. President Donald Trump, is sworn in during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Monday, March 20, 2017. Gorsuch goes before a Senate committee as a heavy favorite, given Republican control, to win confirmation to a lifetime seat on the nations highest court. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Neil Gorsuch, U.S. Supreme Court nominee for U.S. President Donald Trump, is sworn in during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Monday, March 20, 2017. Gorsuch goes before a Senate committee as a heavy favorite, given Republican control, to win confirmation to a lifetime seat on the nations highest court. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Now playing
02:49
How the Supreme Court is like high school
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 26:  U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) attends a lunch meeting for Republican lawmakers in the Cabinet Room at the White House June 26, 2018 in Washington, DC. The president called the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in favor of the administration's travel ban a "tremendous victory," according to published reports.  (Photo by Al Drago-Pool/Getty Images)
Pool/Getty Images
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 26: U.S. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) attends a lunch meeting for Republican lawmakers in the Cabinet Room at the White House June 26, 2018 in Washington, DC. The president called the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in favor of the administration's travel ban a "tremendous victory," according to published reports. (Photo by Al Drago-Pool/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:23
Collins discussed Roe v. Wade with Kavanaugh
CNN
Now playing
01:37
Red-state Dems under pressure for SCOTUS vote
title: File uploaded by user duration: 00:00:00 site:  author:  published:  intervention: no description:
CSPAN
title: File uploaded by user duration: 00:00:00 site: author: published: intervention: no description:
Now playing
01:28
Video raises questions about Kavanaugh's views
Brett Kavanaugh 2016
C-SPAN
Brett Kavanaugh 2016
Now playing
02:39
Hear Kavanaugh discuss independent counsel
CNN
Now playing
02:21
Hear Kavanaugh's first remarks after nomination
POTUS meets with President of Portugal/TAPE
POOL
POTUS meets with President of Portugal/TAPE
Now playing
01:16
Trump reacts to Justice Kennedy retirement
(CNN) —  

CNN Opinion asked commentators to weigh in on President Donald Trump’s choice to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the retirement of Anthony Kennedy – Judge Brett Kavanaugh. The opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the authors.

Barbara Perry: Kavanaugh is perfect choice for a GOP president to make

For nearly all of the 116 successful appointments to the US Supreme Court, two criteria have been paramount: ideological compatibility with the nominating president and objective merit.

Despite Donald Trump’s insistence that he didn’t consider the nominee’s political views, the Federalist Society and the Heritage Foundation, which provided the president with suggested appointees, did. Brett Kavanaugh’s conservative ideology is compatible with these two interest groups and Trump’s most recent ideological posture.

Barbara A. Perry
Courtesy Miller Center at UVA
Barbara A. Perry

Yet Kavanaugh’s brand of conservatism is more akin to his mentor President George W. Bush’s “compassionate” variety than the extremism of many “movement conservatives” in the Goldwater/Reagan mold.

As the nominee to replace his judicial role model Justice Anthony Kennedy, for whom he clerked, Kavanaugh is the perfect candidate to assume the Court’s swing seat under a Republican president. He may be less moderate than Kennedy, but he is not as incendiary as a Robert Bork, whose nomination failed in 1987 at the hands of a Democratic Senate, led by Ted Kennedy. Supreme Court nomination politics are even more polarized now, but the Senate is in GOP hands, even if only narrowly so, making a Bork debacle much less likely.

In addition, Kavanaugh, with his two Yale degrees, and stellar professional pedigree, is unquestionably meritorious and qualified to take his place on the nation’s highest tribunal, joining the long list of luminaries who have graced its bench. Trump has been caught in many a lie, but he has made good on his campaign promise to name qualified conservatives to the bench.

Barbara A. Perry is the Gerald L. Baliles Professor and director of presidential studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. She was a Supreme Court fellow in 1994-95. Follow her on Twitter @BarbaraPerryUVA.

Ilyse Hogue: Women’s fundamental freedom is at stake

President Trump has been very clear that his pick for any Supreme Court nominee would be a vote to end Roe v. Wade, criminalize abortion, and thus punish women. Clearly, he must believe Brett Kavanaugh lives up to his litmus test.

Ilyse Hogue
NARAL
Ilyse Hogue

We can’t forget what America was like before Roe and we know the devastating reality today for so many women in so many states where the right to make the most fundamental decisions about their bodies, families, and lives has been all but eradicated. If confirmed, Judge Kavanaugh would likely use his position as a tool to doom all women to that fate.

Ending Roe doesn’t end abortion – it simply means we have a country where abortion is illegal and women and doctors become criminals. Yet, according to a 2016 survey, nearly seventy percent of Americans believe abortion should remain legal in this country.

With the power to confirm Judge Kavanaugh, Senators now hold the keys to women’s fundamental freedom. They must ensure that the Court is a check against the ideological agenda of this administration and that it’s part of an independent branch of government. This is essential to the human and civil rights our democracy depends on.

Ilyse Hogue is President of NARAL Pro-Choice America.

Ilya Shapiro: Kavanaugh would make a great justice

Brett Kavanaugh is a great pick, even if an inside-the-Beltway double-Ivy swamp creature is a somewhat surprising choice for Donald Trump. Having spent a dozen years on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit – the second-highest court in the land – Kavanaugh has been devoted to textualism and originalism. His opinions are scholarly and influential in the legal profession, often cited by the Supreme Court itself.

Ilya Shapiro
Courtesy Ilya Shapiro
Ilya Shapiro

He’s much like Justice Anthony Kennedy, for whom he clerked, in his dedication to the Constitution’s structural protections for liberty. He believes that, as he put it at the White House ceremony announcing his nomination, “an independent judiciary is the crown jewel of our constitutional republic.” His steadfast defense of civil rights, including the freedom of speech, and religion, and armed self-defense, are so important in these embattled times.

Perhaps most notably, Kavanaugh’s willingness to push back on the excesses of the regulatory state make him a man for the moment. I hope that he joins Justices Gorsuch and Thomas in a project to make judges less deferential to administrative agencies.

More prosaically, Kavanaugh can differentiate between the hats he has worn as a judge, teacher, scholar, and political operator. He sees the judicial role as reading and applying the law, not being an agent for legislative or social change. While, if confirmed, there will be cases where the future Justice Kavanaugh and The Cato Institute do not see eye-to-eye – he’s not a libertarian – I hope that in those politically sensitive times where Chief Justice Roberts may be inclined to tweak a law in order to save it, Kavanaugh will be more like Justice Scalia and let the political chips fall where they may.

There’s no reason to delay Judge Kavanaugh a confirmation in the normal course and nothing in his record to justify the demagoguery he’s already facing. I look forward to seeing him on the bench in the highest court in the land come October.

Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute and editor-in-chief for the Cato Supreme Court Review.

Erika Bachiochi: Amy Coney Barrett would have been a better choice

I have to admit it: I was hoping President Trump would choose Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Brilliant, courageous, and quick on her feet, the professionally and personally esteemed mother of seven puts to rest – in her very person – the central pro-choice feminist assumption that bearing and raising children impedes women’s serious engagement in professional and public life.

Erika Bachiochi
Courtesy of Erika Bachioci
Erika Bachiochi

She would have brought true diversity to the Court on the most rancorous constitutional issue of our day, underscoring how an intellectually astute woman need not acquiesce in the unquestioning abortion rights dogma that has held the cause for women’s rights hostage for far too long now. And she would have been able to make the case the best way possible: debunking the sham legal reasoning that has upheld the putative right for decades by day and blazing an alternative path with her family by night.

Comparatively, President Trump played it safe: Judge Brett Kavanaugh is a legal all-star, an accomplished jurist, and a darling of the conservative judicial establishment; he can be trusted by friend and foe alike to interpret the Constitution as it is written. A solid constitutionalist, Kavanaugh will join those on the Court who are deeply skeptical of its current (internationally extreme) abortion jurisprudence. But with Kavanaugh rather than Coney Barrett, the optics do not bode nearly as well.

Should the President have another chance, and should that chance come in the form of the retirement of an aged Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Trump should pull the trigger and nominate Coney Barrett. Our country desperately needs the opportunity to debate not only abortion, but to see how the autonomy feminism Ginsburg has long represented should pass away with its most cherished leader.

A dignitarian feminism, by contrast, would recognize both that women and men are of equal dignity and are duly encumbered by their shared responsibilities to the vulnerable and dependent – in their own families and in the community at large. Coney Barrett would not only serve the Constitution better than most jurists of our time; she would reveal, by the very integrity of her life, a more dignified way forward.

Erika Bachiochi is a fellow at the Ethics & Public Policy Center and a Visiting Scholar at Harvard Law School.

Erwin Chemerinsky: Can Democrats do a Bork repeat?

Brett Kavanaugh is not the first conservative judge on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to be nominated to replace a “swing justice” on the Supreme Court.

Erwin Chemerinsky
U.C. Irvine
Erwin Chemerinsky

In 1987, Justice Lewis Powell, then widely perceived as occupying that role on the court, announced his retirement. President Ronald Reagan nominated D.C. Circuit Judge Robert Bork to replace Powell. Democrats defeated Bork’s nomination, and Anthony Kennedy was then nominated. Five years later, Kennedy cast the fifth vote to reaffirm Roe v. Wade and to limit school prayer, something Bork publicly declared he would not have done.

Can the Democrats repeat this with Kavanaugh? The challenge is much harder this time. In 1987, Democrats controlled the Senate, and the key to blocking Bork was convincing Southern Democrats, such as Sen. Sam Nunn of Georgia, to vote no. Now, the Senate is controlled by Republicans. With John McCain likely too ill to vote, the Democrats need to convince one Republican senator and all of the Democratic senators, including several who are up for re-election in red states that Trump handily carried in 2016, to vote no.

Of course, if the Democrats succeed in blocking Kavanaugh, Trump will nominate another conservative. The Democrats’ only hope is that defeating Kavanaugh will keep the seat from being filled before the November elections. If the Democrats take the Senate, they surely will refuse to confirm any Trump Supreme Court nominee, following the Republicans’ precedent of denying a vote and a hearing when President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland. If the Republicans retain the Senate, there is no realistic way the Democrats can keep this seat from being filled by someone more conservative than Kennedy.

The stakes for this seat on the Supreme Court are enormous. The future of abortion rights, affirmative action, separation of church and state, limits on the death penalty, the exclusionary rule and so much else where Kennedy voted with the liberals easily could change with one more staunch conservative on the high court. That also was true in 1987, and the Democrats were far better off with Kennedy than Bork. The question is: Can they avoid another very conservative judge again?

Erwin Chemerinsky is the dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law.

Paul Callan: Kavanaugh is no Carswell

Nothing causes more distress to Democrats than the thought that their hated President Trump has this evening nominated his second candidate for the position of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. But the increasingly left-leaning Democratic Party should know that things could have been worse than the president’s choice of conservative appellate judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Paul Callan
CNN
Paul Callan

President Nixon once nominated G. Harrold Carswell, a judge who Senator Roman Hruska of Nebraska once defended by saying: “Even if he is mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren’t they, and a little chance? We can’t have all Brandeises, Cardozos and Frankfurters, and stuff like that there.” Carswell was rejected by a vote of 51-45.

Fortunately, unlike Carswell, Judge Kavanaugh is eminently qualified for service on the Supreme Court. He is a 53-year-old graduate of Yale Law School with a distinguished legal resume including service as Senior Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush, and as a law clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy, the widely respected Justice he may soon replace.

He has 12 years of seasoning as a Judge on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, widely viewed by the legal profession as the Triple-A farm team for the Supreme Court. He is a judicial conservative who professes the belief that judges should attempt to interpret the law and Constitution as written rather than imposing his personal ideology on the text. America’s democracy accords to the president the constitutional prerogative to nominate candidates to the Supreme Court.

So, it’s time for the Democrats to get over it. Kavanaugh’s lengthy record can be evaluated by the Senate and the American public. And fortunately for Democrats and Republicans, Kavanaugh is no Carswell. Things could be far worse. After all, Kim Kardashian appears to have been a hit at the White House recently – and non lawyers can serve on the Supreme Court.

Paul Callan is a CNN legal analyst, a former New York homicide prosecutor and “of counsel” at the New York law firm of Edelman & Edelman PC. Follow him on Twitter @paulcallan.

Tim Naftali: If Gorsuch was an arranged marriage, Kavanaugh is Trump’s love match

Monday night Donald Trump made his own choice for the Supreme Court. Trump’s first nomination to the Court, Neil Gorsuch, was an arranged marriage by comparison.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh was not on the original Federalist Society’s list that candidate Trump endorsed in 2016 to win the hearts and minds of the Christian right. He also wasn’t one of the two potential nominees reportedly given the thumbs up by Senator Mitch McConnell for having the best starting prospects for confirmation. As a result, the East Room became the stage for some unsubtle political theater.

Tim Naftali
New York University
Tim Naftali

Much, though not all, of Monday night’s choreography seemed designed to assuage concerns of Christian conservatives.

In his acceptance speech, Judge Kavanaugh stressed that he went to a Jesuit school and was from a “vibrant Catholic community.” It does not take much imagination to see this as signaling about his views on abortion.

Meanwhile, President Trump, who rarely considers any predecessor worth citing, not only mentioned Ronald Reagan but also invited Ed Meese, Reagan’s attorney general, to the event and gave him a shout out. Meese matters not just because of the link to Reagan but because of his longtime leadership of the staunchly conservative Heritage Foundation.

On his own, Judge Kavanaugh sent some other noteworthy signals. He stressed his love of family, and through a series of anecdotes emphasized a belief in equal opportunity for women. In that case, he was likely speaking to an audience of four: Senators Susan Collins, Heidi Heitkamp, Claire McCaskill and Lisa Murkowski.

The act of repetition in a short speech suggests an awareness that the current politics of the Senate, where the margin for victory is razor-thin and moderate women hold crucial votes, demand at least the appearance of that kind of sensitivity.

The only surprise was that the likely future Justice also mentioned his and his wife’s service to George W. Bush, a name that has almost no traction anymore in Washington and is an epithet in Trump circles.

Perhaps this is what Kavanaugh meant by saying that he intended to be an “independent” Justice. Trump no doubt looked the other way this time because Kavanaugh – who worked for Kenneth Starr in his investigation of Bill Clinton – once caused pain for the Clintons, people the President likes to torment as much or more than the Bushes.

The former director of the Richard Nixon library, Timothy Naftali is a CNN presidential historian who teaches history and public policy at NYU.

Caroline Polisi: Trump wants to choose his own referees

Only in a Trump presidency could we find ourselves in this most unbelievable of situations: the president has chosen a Supreme Court nominee, tipping a pivotal balance of power squarely in his favor, to a Court that could very likely decide the President’s own fate. So while the country is in the midst of a potential constitutional crisis of Trump’s own making, he’s choosing the referees.

Brett Kavanaugh, who started his distinguished legal career as a clerk for Justice Kennedy, and has noted his belief in the “essential neutrality of the law,” is an extremely well-qualified nominee to the Supreme Court. He also happens to be a staunch conservative who published a law review article noting that the indictment of a sitting president would “cripple” the federal government and would “ill serve the public interest.”

Here are some of the lofty questions potentially facing Judge Kavanaugh, should he be confirmed:

Yulia Nar

Can a sitting president be indicted? If special counsel Robert Mueller were to find evidence of criminal conduct on the part of the president, and did decide to move forward with an indictment, (which, admittedly, I think is unlikely), the issue would certainly make its way to the Supreme Court. Kavanaugh is on record noting his belief that a sitting president should not be indicted while in office. Either that is sheer coincidence, or the President noted this position when choosing his nominee.

Can the president pardon himself? The issue has never been legally tested, but if Trump were to attempt it, this issue would have to be resolved by SCOTUS. Kavanaugh, a Constitutional textualist, would likely vote that a self-pardon is constitutional, merely because the text of the Constitution itself does not explicitly prohibit it.

Can a sitting president be compelled to testify before a grand jury? Mueller will have to decide very soon whether or not he will proceed without Trump’s testimony, or whether he will subpoena the president to testify before the Grand Jury. Kavanaugh may get the pivotal vote on this issue.

The fact that a judge was nominated by a particular president is not a basis for recusal in all cases connected to that president. And Supreme Court justices do not have to abide by the recusal rules set for other federal judges – they make case-by-case determinations. If Kavanaugh is confirmed, however, President Trump will have cemented a conservative legacy by defining the Supreme Court for more than a generation.

At the very least, Kavanaugh should recuse himself from deciding any of the three questions above in order to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

Caroline Polisi is a federal and white collar criminal defense attorney in New York, a frequent CNN contributor and is of counsel at Pierce Bainbridge. Follow her on Twitter: @CarolinePolisi.

Errol Louis: Why Trump chose a Beltway soldier

President Trump took a break from pandering to his base Monday night, throwing a bone to establishment Republicans he’ll need to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Errol Louis
Errol Louis

For all his complaints about the so-called Deep State and despite promises to “drain the swamp,” in the end Trump chose in Kavanaugh, a Beltway veteran, experienced in several high-profile political battles over the last two decades. It’s moderate Republican Senators and red-state Democrats that Trump needs to get Kavanaugh confirmed with at least 51 Senate votes. In order to get them, he has nominated a DC soldier with a taste for political combat. Those skills will come in handy when Democrats try to stall or derail Kavanaugh’s nomination.

As a young man, Kavanaugh in the 1990s worked on Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr’s investigation into Bill Clinton, during which he laid the groundwork on how a president could be impeached for obstructing justice.

Kavanaugh also served as an attorney in the case of Elian Gonzalez, a 6-year-old Cuban boy who was deported to Cuba over the objections of conservatives who made the child a symbol of opposition to the communist Castro regime. And in the 2000 election, he was on the legal staff for the Bush campaign during the contentious recount that gave the White House to George W. Bush.

Despite the well-known enmity between Trump and the Bush family, the president’s choice of Kavanaugh signals the hard reality that establishment Republicans – Bush Republicans – will control whether Trump’s pick gets confirmed to the Supreme Court.

Errol Louis is the host of “Inside City Hall,” a nightly political show on NY1, a New York all-news channel.

Dawn Laguens: There’s no question on Roe

As a mother of three daughters and one of the one-in-four women in this country, according to the Guttmacher Institute, who have had an abortion, I know what is on the line if Judge Brett Kavanaugh is confirmed to serve on the Supreme Court. Because I don’t have any question about how he will rule on abortion.

President Donald Trump already told us. He promised that he would only nominate judges who would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Those of us who support abortion rights are taking him at his word.