(UNKNOWN): It's good.
MODERATOR: Good to go?
(UNKNOWN): Yeah, we tested it so (inaudible). I'll interrupt you if I can't hear for some reasons, but we said that's fantastic (ph), if you can hear us.
MODERATOR: Hey guys. Hey. This briefing's going to be on background. It's off camera and not for broadcast. (Inaudible) here can be referred to as a Senior White House Official. He is (inaudible). And he can take it from here.
No, you guys can report on it. Senior White House Official.
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: You too. Thank you, good afternoon. So this morning, the President sent a letter to Kim Jong Un and the President dictated every word of the letter himself. He told Kim Jong Un that I was very much looking forward to being there with you.
He said that sadly, based on the tremendous anger and open hostility displayed in your most recent statement, I feel that -- I feel it is inappropriate at this time to have this long planned meeting.
And therefore please let this letter serve to represent that the Singapore summit for the good of both parties but for the detriment of the world will not take place. To understand the President's decision, I think it's important to review what's transpired since March 8th.
It was on March 8th that a delegation visiting from South Korea came to the White House to deliver a message from Kim Jong Un to President Trump. The message conveyed from President -- or from Kim Jong Un was that Kim is committed to denuclearization.
Kim pledged to refrain from any further nuclear or missile tests and Kim said he understood that routine joint military exercises between the Republic of Korea and the United States would continue. Kim also expressed his desire to meet with President Trump as soon as possible.
In light of all this, President Trump accepted Kim Jong Un's offer to meet in person. Since that day, when President Trump accepted Kim Jong Un's invitation, the United States has made significant efforts to prepare for their meeting, and we have done so in good faith.
But there has been a trail of broken promises that gave the United States pause. Last week, North Korea objected to a routine annual joint military exercise between the United States and South Korea. They called our exercises quote "provocative military disturbances."
And they canceled their meeting with the South Koreans. That constituted a broken promise. On Secretary Pompeo's second trip to Pyongyang, North Korea promised to -- that the two sides would meet in Singapore last week to jointly work on logistical preparations for the summit.
The White House sent its Deputy Chief of Staff, who leads White House planning in advance of presidential visits and his advance teams to Singapore. They waited and they waited. The North Koreans never showed up.
The North Koreans didn't tell us anything, they simply stood us up. And today, to great fanfare, North Korea claims to have destroyed its Punggye-ri nuclear test site. And we certainly hope that that's the case, but we really don't know.
What may be news to you is that Secretary Pompeo and the South Korean government were promised by the North Koreans that international experts and officials would be invited to witness and verify today's demolition. But that promise was broken.
Instead, journalists were invited and we will not have forensic evidence that much was accomplished. It's possible that the tunnels were detonated in a way that will still allow them to be used in the future. And I think Ben Tracy of CBS News said it best.
I just saw a report he filed. He said quote "the problem is we're journalists. We're not nuclear experts, so there was no one on site, no outside expert to verify that what North Korea claims it has done, closing its nuclear test site, has actually occurred."
On the subject of communications between the United States and North Korea, I regret that the news has also been spotty. The United States has over the past week made numerous attempts to communicate with the North Koreans, but they have not responded.
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: In fact, the first communication that we've received in a week arrived last night in the form of a propaganda release, in which North Korean regime issued a statement threatening the United States to quote "meet us in a meeting room or encounter us at a nuclear-to-nuclear showdown."
The letter claimed that nuke - that North Korea was a quote "nuclear weapons state," and of course the North Korean regime also singled out and attacked the vice president of the United States.
So this strange lack of judgment combined with the broken promises over the past weeks and North Korea suspension of direct communication with the United States suggests a profound lack of good faith.
The president was always clear that he was prepared to walk away from this meeting and he has kept his word. The president, in his letter, showed that he remains open to meeting Kim Jong-un someday, but the president's overarching goal isn't a meeting, it has always been the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, and the president will never compromise the safety and security of the United States or our allies.
And with that, I'd be happy to take some questions. Yes.
QUESTION: (Inaudible) clarifications real quick. Number one, the president alluded to a dialogue between himself and Kim Jong-un, did they speak personally? Did the two of them speak directly?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: The two have communicated through diplomacy, through Secretary Pompeo, and -- and the messages that -- that the secretary has carried.
QUESTION: So not directly, then.
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: Just -- actually (ph) just -- just as I stated.
QUESTION: Did -- is Joe Higgins (ph) (inaudible) for the planning meeting this weekend?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: I have no -- nothing to announce on that. It (ph) sounds a bit (inaudible).
QUESTION: (Inaudible) why didn't we tell our allies before the president released a letter?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: So the president had constant communication with our allies. President had President Moon here earlier this week, just a couple days ago, and President Trump was very forthright in sharing his skepticism about North Korea's intentions to denuclearize, his skepticism about whether North Korea, in light of the things I just told you about, was even serious about going forward with a meeting and asked President Moon's advice.
He shared with President Moon his concern that a meeting may not be able to happen under -- under these conditions, and we were in contact with the South Koreans and with the Japanese in Singapore this morning. Sir, yes.
QUESTION: You -- you have a letter and it says, and I quote, talk about your nuclear capabilities, but ours so massive and powerful, that I pray to god that they will never have to be used.
It seems heavy handed, but was there an indication from North Korea that they didn't believe we had nuclear weapons or that in some way that they could take us on in a nuclear showdown?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: Well I -- I think that -- that -- the -- the president -- I think it was hard for anyone to miss the implicit threat in the North Korean propaganda statement last night about a nuclear showdown, and the president saw fit to remind North Korea of the real balance of power here. (Inaudible).
QUESTION: Our -- our -- well (inaudible) can I just clarify really -- so it is our -- the government's stance -- our government's stance that we believe that North Korea was trying to challenge us in a nuclear showdown?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: I -- I -- you can interpret how you want, but what -- what the North Koreans wrote, but the president's letter I think speaks -- speaks pretty clearly for itself. Sir, and then I'll come over to this side, yes.
QUESTION: What conditions will the president need to see in order to have his summit back on either on June 12th or in the future, especially given now that the North Koreans have shown that they will negotiate and act in bad faith as you said?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: Yes, so I -- we'd need to see -- I guess in some ways, the opposite of all the things that I just described that have taken place over the past couple --
QUESTION: (Inaudible) one, what importance, if any, do you attach to John Bolton's discussion of the Libya president and North Korea's strong reaction to it? And then secondly, the president has twice alluded to the second meeting that Kim had with President Xi.
What happened at that meeting that makes the president think that somehow North Korea's tone changed afterwards?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: Yes, you know, I -- I would refer all of you actually to take a look at the -- the statement that a North Korean official put out a week ago. This is the 16 May statement, because if you look at it, what he was objecting to was not just a comment by any American official, he was objecting to a litany of things.
Including the, quote, complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of the peninsula. He was objecting to U.S. statements calling for the total decommissioning of nuclear weapons.
He was objecting, in that statement, to comments about the importance of the unilateral nuclear abandonment on the part of North Korea. So complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization.
It's a mouthful, but it should be a familiar mouthful, because that's been U.S. policy going back to the George W. Bush administration. This has been our policy all along, so how can North Korea, a few weeks after in an -- in a inter Korean summit -- how could it declare that it is moving forward with the goal of complete denuclearization, but object to denuclearization in a statement two weeks later.
It's a head scratcher. Ma'am, yes.
QUESTION: (Inaudible) what about the (inaudible)?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: I -- I mean the president, as you alluded to, I mean the president's made some public comments about his sense that after the second meeting between the Chinese and North Korean leaders, there was a shift in attitude.
And we can only speculate as to exactly what was discussed or -- or why that might be, but the shift in attitude did not go unnoticed by the president. Ma'am and then (inaudible).
QUESTION: First off (ph) can you just kind of tell us (ph) why this is background (ph) bracing (ph), (inaudible) given the I think (ph) the gravity of the information?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: I -- you know, I -- I think we -- on the one hand, you have the president speaking today, now not only through this letter, but also in his comments at the top of the bill signing.
Let -- let -- let the president's remarks stand. (Inaudible) Secretary Pompeo has been speaking today as well. So we're trying to give you -- we're trying to give you a little context on background basis, yes. (Inaudible).
QUESTION: Can you clarify how much closer we are today or are we closer to a military confrontation, I mean after the (inaudible)?
SENIOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL: Yes, I -- nothing to say in -- in that respect. What I would like to highlight is the president's comment today that our policy remains what it has been since the beginning of this administration when we undertook a policy review in the -- in the first days after the president took office.
And that is a policy of maximum pressure, and -- and that is -- that is going to continue. Sir, yes.
QUESTION: Can you clarify that the president announced the letter and (inaudible) summit is called