After Cosby mistrial: what comes next? _00043107.jpg
After Cosby mistrial: what comes next?
08:57 - Source: CNN

Story highlights

The judge released jury names despite objection of prosecution and defense teams

Jurors are not allowed to disclose anything fellow jurors said or did during deliberations

CNN  — 

The judge presiding over comedian Bill Cosby’s trial has released the names of the 12 jurors and six alternates.

After requests from several media outlets, including CNN, Montgomery County Judge Steven O’Neill decided to release the names, while keeping the jury deliberations confidential, according to a court document released Wednesday.

The document states that a disclosure of anything said or done during deliberations “would have a chilling effect upon future jurors in this case and their ability to deliberate freely.”

The court emphasized that jurors are not allowed to disclose the opinions and thoughts of their fellow jurors, as well as any arguments or comments made, or votes cast, by fellow jurors during deliberations.

The names were released to the public after the jurors were contacted by the court and given instructions.

Prosecutors say Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted Andrea Constand, the former director of operations for Temple University’s women’s basketball team, at his home near Philadelphia in January 2004. Cosby was charged with three counts of aggravated indecent assault.

The jurors for the trial were selected in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and taken to Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, where they were sequestered for the 12 days of trial and deliberations.

On June 17 the court declared a mistrial after a jury deadlock. Prosecutors said they will retry the case.

According to the post-trial instructions, the judge acknowledges the freedom of the press, stating “there is no law forbidding them to question discharged jurors,” and adding that a juror can decline to be interviewed at any time.

The document said the court had “significant concerns” over publication of the names during the trial, when attempts to contact jurors’ families and friends, who would likely have contacted the jurors, would have caused “consternation and distraction from their sworn duty.”

The prosecution filed a memorandum opposing the release of the names, saying it “could have a chilling effect on future jurors and could impair both parties’ right to a fair and impartial trial.” The defense team later joined the request to deny the release of names.

After balancing the rights of all parties, the court decided to release the names, the document said.