Now playing
02:31
Attorney General Chin supports travel ban halt
President Donald Trump addresses the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly, at U.N. headquarters, Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2018. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
Richard Drew/AP
President Donald Trump addresses the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly, at U.N. headquarters, Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2018. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
Now playing
01:17
Trump to migrants: Make your nations great again
Central American immigrants depart ICE custody, pending future immigration court hearings on June 11, 2018 in McAllen, Texas. Thousands of undocumented immigrants continue to cross into the U.S., despite the Trump administration's recent "zero tolerance" approach to immigration policy.  (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
John Moore/Getty Images
Central American immigrants depart ICE custody, pending future immigration court hearings on June 11, 2018 in McAllen, Texas. Thousands of undocumented immigrants continue to cross into the U.S., despite the Trump administration's recent "zero tolerance" approach to immigration policy. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:06
Judge blocks asylum seekers from deportation
Pool
Now playing
01:51
Trump: I prefer shutdown before midterms
CHICAGO, IL - JUNE 29:  Demonstrators hold a rally in the Little village neighborhood calling for the elimination of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and an end to family detentions on June 29, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois. Protests have erupted around the country recently as people voice outrage over the separation and detention of undocumented children and their parents.  (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Scott Olson/Getty Images North America/Getty Images
CHICAGO, IL - JUNE 29: Demonstrators hold a rally in the Little village neighborhood calling for the elimination of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and an end to family detentions on June 29, 2018 in Chicago, Illinois. Protests have erupted around the country recently as people voice outrage over the separation and detention of undocumented children and their parents. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:30
HHS refusing to release family separation stats
Now playing
01:01
Reporter to Sarah Sanders: Why did Trump lie?
Now playing
01:28
Trump: ICE agents are mean but have heart
Pool
Now playing
01:23
Trump: Our facilities better than Obama's
trump king of jordan visit
CNN
trump king of jordan visit
Now playing
01:15
Trump: No regrets signing executive order
Immigrant children walk in a line outside the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children, a former Job Corps site that now houses them, on Wednesday, June 20, 2018, in Homestead, Fla. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)
Brynn Anderson/AP
Immigrant children walk in a line outside the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children, a former Job Corps site that now houses them, on Wednesday, June 20, 2018, in Homestead, Fla. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)
Now playing
01:54
Children in limbo after Trump executive order
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House, Thursday, June 21, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Evan Vucci/AP
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House, Thursday, June 21, 2018, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Now playing
02:18
White House chaos over immigration reversal
Watched by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen (L) and Vice President Mike Pence, US President Donald Trump signs an executive order on immigration in the Oval Office of the White House on June 20, 2018 in Washington, DC. - US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order aimed at putting an end to the controversial separation of migrant families at the border, reversing a harsh practice that had earned international scorn."It's about keeping families together," Trump said at the signing ceremony. "I did not like the sight of families being separated," he added. (Photo by Mandel Ngan / AFP)        (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images
Watched by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen (L) and Vice President Mike Pence, US President Donald Trump signs an executive order on immigration in the Oval Office of the White House on June 20, 2018 in Washington, DC. - US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order aimed at putting an end to the controversial separation of migrant families at the border, reversing a harsh practice that had earned international scorn."It's about keeping families together," Trump said at the signing ceremony. "I did not like the sight of families being separated," he added. (Photo by Mandel Ngan / AFP) (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
Now playing
02:49
What's next after Trump's policy reversal?
Trump meeting 06202018
POOL
Trump meeting 06202018
Now playing
02:33
Trump reverses position on family separations
President Donald Trump signs an executive order to keep families together at the border, but says that the 'zero-tolerance' prosecution policy will continue, during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, June 20, 2018. Standing behind Trump are Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, left, and Vice President Mike Pence. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
President Donald Trump signs an executive order to keep families together at the border, but says that the 'zero-tolerance' prosecution policy will continue, during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, June 20, 2018. Standing behind Trump are Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, left, and Vice President Mike Pence. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Now playing
01:52
Trump signs executive order to end family separations
CNN
Now playing
01:18
Trump: Take children away to prosecute parents
THE PRESIDENT meets with the National Space Council  In-House Pool (Pre-set 9:30AM | Final Gather 11:15AM -- Palm Room Doors)
Pool
THE PRESIDENT meets with the National Space Council In-House Pool (Pre-set 9:30AM | Final Gather 11:15AM -- Palm Room Doors)
Now playing
01:40
Trump: The US will not be a migrant camp

Story highlights

Hawaii judge concludes ban was unconstitutional and discriminatory

President defiant about ban, predicts victory upon appeal

(CNN) —  

Just hours before it was due to go into effect, US President Donald Trump’s revised executive order banning travelers from six Muslim-majority nations was struck down by a federal court in Hawaii late Wednesday.

Thursday morning, a federal judge in Maryland also temporarily blocked the order.

The new ban was announced earlier this month and would have barred people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the US for 90 days and all refugees for 120 days.

Iraq was removed from the list of banned countries, and the new version also exempts green card and visa holders. Contentious language referring to religious minorities was also removed.

But US District Court Judge Derrick Watson in Hawaii issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) after concluding that the ban was unconstitutional, a view based largely on discriminatory comments made by Trump himself.

The Justice Department said it will defend the new travel ban.

“The Department of Justice strongly disagrees with the federal district court’s ruling, which is flawed both in reasoning and in scope,” the Department said in a statement Wednesday night.

“The President’s Executive Order falls squarely within his lawful authority in seeking to protect our Nation’s security.”

Here’s what you need to know about the latest ban, and the ruling on it.

Why has it been blocked? What did the judge say?

The ruling is almost entirely based on the “intent of the Trump administration,” says CNN correspondent Jessica Schneider.

“The judge specifically said it was that intent to create this Muslim ban that violated the Constitution’s establishment clause… he pointed to several instances, very specifically, saying it was President Trump’s own words on the campaign trail… advocating the ‘complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.’”

The judge said it was illogical that the ban was not motivated by religious discrimination.

“The illogic of the Government’s contentions is palpable,” Watson wrote. “The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed.”

“Equally flawed is the notion that the Executive Order cannot be found to have targeted Islam because it applies to all individuals in the six referenced countries.”

A timeline of President Trump’s travel bans

What is Trump saying about the ruling?

At a rally in Tennessee Wednesday night, Trump decried the decision as “unprecedented judicial overreach,” and called it a politically motivated move that makes the US look “weak.” He’s vowed to take the case to the Supreme Court if necessary.

“This goes beyond me, because there’ll be other presidents,” he said. “We need this and sometimes we need it very badly… for the security of our country.”

He was defiant about the ban, and predicted victory upon appeal. “We’re going to win… we’re going to keep our citizens safe,” he told the crowd in Nashville.

He described the new order as “a watered-down version of the first (order)” and said that he wanted to “go back to the first one.”

He so far has not attacked Watson, unlike his response to the judge who issued the TRO on his first attempt at a ban. Back then, he tweeted that the “so-called judge” should shoulder the blame for any terror attacks that may occur while his ban was on lockdown.

Is this judicial overreach?

The judges on the Ninth Circuit Court – which upheld the first TRO in February – issued an opinion on the ruling and five Republican-appointed judges alluded to the idea of judicial overreach.

They wrote “whatever we as individuals may feel about the President or executive order, the President’s decision was well within the powers of the presidency.”

CNN’s Schneider says the argument about the context surrounding the ruling, versus the content of the bill, could be a “big point of contention.”

“Should we be looking at the intent of someone who made those comments while he wasn’t president?” she asked.

Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin said the bigger picture is important.

“I don’t think Judge Watson was overreaching because there is precedent for the courts to look at the context,” he told CNN. “Context matters.”

Maryland AG Brian Frosh – who filed the motion in his state to challenge the order – argued that it is instead a “great example of executive overreach.”

He said “the (federal) judges are doing their job here. It’s not just one judge, it’s six, seven judges that have all said that the first Muslim ban was a violation of the first amendment and now the second one is as well. Donald Trump’s problem is what he himself has said – he’s described this as a Muslim ban.”

Opinion: Hawaii judge upholds America’s ‘Golden Rule’

What’s the next step?

Federal judges in several other states, including Washington, are also in the process of evaluating challenges to the new travel ban, but may defer their decisions in light of the nationwide ruling in Hawaii.

Trump has already said he’ll appeal the Hawaii judge’s order, so it is likely, as with the previous executive order, to be heard in front of the Ninth Circuit Court.

Last time around the Trump administration ultimately dropped the appeal process and instead focused on drafting the revised order, but this time the President has vowed to take it to the Supreme Court if necessary.

“(The ruling) is just a temporary injunction,” Chin said. “There’s the option to appeal up to the Supreme Court we’re all predicting that this isn’t the end of the story, that we’re simply in a first round, moving on from here.”

Meet some of the people who support the ban

What is the likelihood of the TRO becoming permanent?

“There’s a sense among the lawyers I’ve spoken to that this time the travel ban is crafted more narrowly and has some chance at being upheld at the end of the day,” New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof told CNN’s Don Lemon.

Page Pate, a criminal defense attorney, agreed the ban has a chance of passing on appeal.

“This new travel ban is different. I think the administration addressed some of the deficiencies in the due process area and there is nothing on the face of it which discriminates against Muslims.”

Defense attorney and constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz said that, while the TRO ruling is not guaranteed to be upheld on appeal, it is potentially precedent-setting.

“I believe that this presents a very tough case for the Supreme Court,” he told CNN. “It’s the first case in which the Supreme Court has been asked to take into account what a political figure said while running for office and use that to interpret the words of a statute.”