The seal of the F.B.I. hangs in the Flag Room at the bureau's headquarters in Washington.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty
The seal of the F.B.I. hangs in the Flag Room at the bureau's headquarters in Washington.
Now playing
01:00
FBI asked DOJ to refute wiretapping claim
US President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama talk on the East front steps of the US Capitol after inauguration ceremonies on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC.
ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images
US President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama talk on the East front steps of the US Capitol after inauguration ceremonies on January 20, 2017 in Washington, DC.
Now playing
02:23
The wiretapping saga in 2 minutes
Devin Nunes Trump communications Elijah Cummings newday_00000000.jpg
CNN
Devin Nunes Trump communications Elijah Cummings newday_00000000.jpg
Now playing
01:17
Rep. Cummings: Nunes should be investigated
Nunes
CNN
Nunes
Now playing
01:59
Nunes: I invited myself over to tell Trump
Devin Nunes LEAD
CNN
Devin Nunes LEAD
Now playing
01:36
Nunes clarifies: Still no wiretap evidence
Now playing
01:18
Spicer pushes back on wiretapping claims
FBI Director James Comey looks on during the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on Russian actions during the 2016 election campaign on March 20, 2017.
NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty images
FBI Director James Comey looks on during the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on Russian actions during the 2016 election campaign on March 20, 2017.
Now playing
01:06
Comey: No info supporting wiretapping tweets
circa 1968:  A man placing a tap in a phone.  (Photo by MPI/Getty Images)
MPI/Archive Photos/Getty Images
circa 1968: A man placing a tap in a phone. (Photo by MPI/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:41
Wiretapping: The one thing you need to know
Comey Obama could not unilaterally order wiretap mobile jpm_00005628.jpg
Comey Obama could not unilaterally order wiretap mobile jpm_00005628.jpg
Now playing
01:07
Comey: Obama could not order wiretap alone
President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel participate in a joint news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, March 17, 2017.
Evan Vucci/AP
President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel participate in a joint news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, March 17, 2017.
Now playing
00:45
Trump on wiretapping: Talk to Fox News
Fox News Shephard Smith defends CNN reporter cnni_00000000.jpg
Fox News
Fox News Shephard Smith defends CNN reporter cnni_00000000.jpg
Now playing
01:16
Shep Smith answers Trump's call to go ask Fox
Spicer Acosta wiretapping claim sot_00000000.jpg
Spicer Acosta wiretapping claim sot_00000000.jpg
Now playing
02:54
Spicer spars with CNN over wiretapping claim
CNN
Now playing
01:21
Cuomo, congressman spar over wiretap claims
Now playing
02:11
Haley: Trump's claim won't hurt my credibility
CNN
Now playing
01:36
Santorum: Trump is hurting himself
Joseph Kennedy III on CNN's Jake Tapper's show
CNN
Joseph Kennedy III on CNN's Jake Tapper's show
Now playing
01:12
Joe Kennedy on Trump: His word is not good
Paul Ryan
CNN
Paul Ryan
Now playing
02:04
Ryan: Trump 'bridging gaps' in bill process

Story highlights

The vast majority of requests for permission to conduct electronic surveillance are approved

The court started authorizing more sweeping collections of mass data after 9/11

(CNN) —  

It’s a highly fortified courtroom where some of the most secretive government decisions get made. And you’ve probably never heard of it.

But in the coming days, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court – known as the FISA court or FISC – will get more attention after President Donald Trump claimed he was wiretapped during the Obama administration. (Trump has not offered any evidence supporting his claim.)

So how exactly does the court work? And why does it have a controversial reputation? Here’s what you need to know:

What is the FISA court?

The FISA court is a tribunal established in 1978 that decides whether to approve wiretaps, data collection and government requests to monitor suspected terrorists and spies.

It’s just blocks away from the White House and Capitol, inside a secure area of the US District Court on Constitution Avenue. But it’s completely out of the public eye.

Officials won’t say exactly where the FISA courtroom is located inside the bunker-like complex. It’s so secretive, the room is tightly sealed to prevent eavesdropping.

How does the court work?

Eleven federal district judges serve on a rotating basis, usually for one week at a time. All judges have a maximum term of seven years with the FISA court.

And only one person has the power to appoint the judges: Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts.

Congress doesn’t need to confirm which federal judges take on the added responsibility of serving on the FISA court.

The judges come from across the country – in fact, they have to come from at least seven of the US judicial circuits.

In theory, those judges can issue warrants from anywhere, said University of Texas law professor and CNN contributor Steve Vladeck. But in practice, the judges usually issue orders during the weeks when they’re “on rotation” at the FISA court in Washington.

Can a President authorize a wiretap, as Trump claimed?

No. A President can – through investigative agencies – request a warrant, but only a court or judge can order one to be issued.

A federal judge could only approve a warrant to wiretap Trump’s phones under very limited circumstances, said CNN contributor and University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck.

One such circumstance would be if the judge found probable cause that Trump committed a federal crime. Another would be if a judge found probable cause to believe that individuals that Trump or his associates were speaking to were agents of a foreign power.

But a former senior US official with direct knowledge of the Justice Department’s investigations said investigators never sought a warrant to monitor Trump’s phones.

And former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told NBC News he “can deny”there was a FISA court order to wiretap Trump.

“For the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the President, the president-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign,” Clapper said.

What was the original goal of the FISA court?

It started back in 1978 with the court’s namesake, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. That law was enacted “to authorize electronic surveillance to obtain foreign intelligence information.”

Back then, the Cold War was in full force. And foreign spying – not terrorism – was the big concern.

FISA also came in the wake of the Watergate scandal and after revelations that the government had been using national security as a pretext to spy on citizens, such as the FBI’s spying on the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

The FISA court started by granting individual warrants for collecting certain pieces of electronic data. But big changes came in the 21st century.

What changed?

After the 9/11 terror attacks, the court started authorizing more sweeping collections of mass data.

In 2008, for example, changes in surveillance laws gave the attorney general and the national intelligence director more authority to order “mass acquisition” of electronic traffic, as long as it’s related to a terror or espionage investigation.

In other words, a FISA court judge could authorize the collection of a telecom company’s entire database of phone records, if it’s deemed relevant to counterterrorism efforts.

Why has it come under criticism?

Controversy over the FISA court’s broad powers blew up in 2013, when Edward Snowden revealed a secret court order approving the mass collection of metadata from telecom giant Verizon and Internet companies such as Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo.

That led to a heated debate about the limits of privacy and due process.

The FISA court does hear challenges, though. In 2013, Yahoo scored a win when FISC ruled that the government must publish court papers from 2008 detailing Yahoo’s objections to releasing users’ data without a warrant.

But there are other reasons the FISA court has come under fire.

Because it’s closed off from the public and only hears the government’s side, some say the court basically “rubber-stamps” any request from the government.

The FISA court does routinely send applications back to the government to be modified and narrowed, Vladeck said. But the vast majority of applications eventually get approved.

Between 1979 and 2015, virtually all requests for surveillance were approved by the FISA court, though some were modified, according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a privacy watchdog group.

And a 2016 Justice Department report showed that of the 1,457 requests made to the FISA court in 2015 for permission to conduct electronic surveillance, one was withdrawn by the government. As for the rest, “FISC did not deny any applications in whole, or in part,” the Justice Department said.

This piece incorporates information previously published in a 2014 CNN article.