clinton trump debate reality check stop frisk foreman_00002004.jpg
clinton trump debate reality check stop frisk foreman_00002004.jpg
Now playing
01:29
Debate reality check: Does 'stop and frisk' stop crime?
(L-R) Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton shake hands prior to the start of the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York.  The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
(L-R) Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton shake hands prior to the start of the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt.
Now playing
01:57
The first presidential debate in under 2 minutes
PAUL J. RICHARDS/Getty Images
Now playing
00:51
Trump: I'm 'smart' for paying no taxes (2016)
Now playing
01:56
Clinton: Trump called women pigs, slobs and dogs
Now playing
01:22
Trump: Clinton doesn't have the stamina to be president
HEMPSTEAD, NY - SEPTEMBER 26:  Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York.  The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt.  (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Win McNamee/Getty Images
HEMPSTEAD, NY - SEPTEMBER 26: Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:30
Clinton slams 'trumped up, trickle down' economics
donald trump post debate interview bash taxes birther response_00000707.jpg
donald trump post debate interview bash taxes birther response_00000707.jpg
Now playing
03:19
Trump speaks out on taxes, birther movement
AFP/Getty Images
Now playing
02:15
Trump repeatedly interrupts Clinton
Donald Trump speaking at the 1st Presidential Debate at Hofstra University, New York on September 26, 2016
CNN
Donald Trump speaking at the 1st Presidential Debate at Hofstra University, New York on September 26, 2016
Now playing
02:09
Donald Trump: We have to bring back law and order
Now playing
00:52
Hillary Clinton: Donald Trump says crazy things
clinton trump debate hofstra temperament bts_00004205.jpg
POOL
clinton trump debate hofstra temperament bts_00004205.jpg
Now playing
01:15
Trump and Clinton battle over presidential temperament
Donald Trump speaking at the 1st Presidential Debate at Hofstra University, New York on September 26, 2016
CNN
Donald Trump speaking at the 1st Presidential Debate at Hofstra University, New York on September 26, 2016
Now playing
02:06
Trump: I was against Iraq War, ask Sean Hannity
Drew Angerer/PAUL J. RICHARDS/Getty Images
Now playing
00:45
Trump: Emails weren't a mistake, you did it purposely
Now playing
02:14
Donald Trump defends tax cuts for the wealthy
HEMPSTEAD, NY - SEPTEMBER 26:  Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump stands at his podium during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York.  The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt.  (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Win McNamee/Getty Images
HEMPSTEAD, NY - SEPTEMBER 26: Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump stands at his podium during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:58
Trump: I'll release taxes if Clinton releases emails

Story highlights

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani defended stop-and-frisk earlier this week

The policing tactic remains highly controversial

(CNN) —  

During the first presidential debate, both Hillary Clinton and moderator Lester Holt stated that the controversial police practice known as “stop-and-frisk” had been ruled unconstitutional in New York.

In an op-ed column in Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who instituted the practice of large-scale warrantless search of people in his city, declared Clinton and Holt to be flat wrong and he called upon Holt to apologize for “trying so hard to help Mrs. Clinton support her incorrect statement that stop-and-frisk is unconstitutional.”

Giuliani also credited stop-and-frisk with helping to bring about “an 85% reduction in crime in New York City between 1994 and 2013.”

Is Giuliani right?

As the former mayor noted in his op-ed, stop-and-frisk grew out of a 1968 Supreme Court decision, Terry v. Ohio, which ruled that police are allowed to stop and search a person if officers have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime. It is still the law of the land.

In 2013, US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin found that New York’s stop-and-frisk strategy focused too heavily on black and Hispanic people and was carried out too often without reasonable suspicion.

As a result, she ruled that New York’s stop-and-frisk policy was unconstitutional “as applied.” Scheindlin specifically said she was not ordering New York to end stop-and-frisk, but instead, she ordered the city’s police to reform their training and policing procedures to, among other things, make sure that officers do not engage in racial profiling when determine who to stop. She also appointed a monitor to oversee how the department was carrying out her orders.

Scheindlin’s ruling was highly controversial. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals halted enforcement of the reforms she had ordered and returned the case to a lower court for further review. The appeals court also took unusual step of removing her from the case.

But the appellate court did not overturn her ruling that the way the city was carrying out stop-and-frisk was unconstitutional, since it violated Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

It is also true that the way stop-and-frisk was carried out in New York – tactics that Giuliani touted as helping to “change New York City from the crime capital of America to the safest large city in the country” – is still considered illegal.

So Giuliani is correct when he says that stop-and-frisk overall is constitutional, which is how Clinton described it.

But here is what Holt said during the debate: “Stop-and-frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York because it largely singled out black and Hispanic young men.”

That is a correct description of Scheindlin’s ruling and Giuliani is wrong to criticize Holt for characterizing it that way.

With regard to the effectiveness of stop-and-frisk, critics note that violent crime was decreasing in New York in the second half of the administration of David Dinkins, who was Giuliani’s Democratic predecessor. It continued to fall during Giuliani’s time in office. It continued to fall when his successor, Michael Bloomberg, dramatically ramped up stop-and-frisk. Stop-and-frisk peaked in 2011 under the Bloomberg administration, but was cut back amid protests and lawsuits against the practice.

Still, violent crime fell. And it continues to fall under the administration of Bill de Blasio, who has scaled back the practice even further, though it is still a tactic used on a much less frequent basis.

Critics also note that violent crime was tumbling across the country, including in cities that did not use stop-and-frisk as aggressively as New York. Indeed, during the time when stop-and-frisk was at its most intense in New York, other cities, such as Dallas and Los Angeles, that did not use the practice so extensively saw even greater decreases in violent crime.