NS Slug: LA: AG LORETTA LYNCH ON NC VOTING  Synopsis: Loretta Lynch: "It targeted African Americans as the court noted with almost surgical precision"  Keywords: LOUISIANA LORETTA LYNCH
WBRZ
NS Slug: LA: AG LORETTA LYNCH ON NC VOTING Synopsis: Loretta Lynch: "It targeted African Americans as the court noted with almost surgical precision" Keywords: LOUISIANA LORETTA LYNCH
Now playing
00:59
Attorney General pleased NC voter law struck down
Fox News/Twitter
Now playing
01:33
ADL wants Fox News to fire Tucker Carlson over racist comments
CNN
Now playing
02:36
The truth behind Covid-19 vaccines for sale on the dark web
Now playing
04:22
Levi's CEO has message for Mitch McConnell
Now playing
01:54
'You think I'm racist': Former Fox News host storms off camera
Korie Robertson and Willie Robertson of the reality series "Duck Dynasty" attend the Capitol File 58th Presidential Inauguration Reception at Fiola Mare on January 19, 2017 in Washington, DC.
Paul Morigi/Getty Images
Korie Robertson and Willie Robertson of the reality series "Duck Dynasty" attend the Capitol File 58th Presidential Inauguration Reception at Fiola Mare on January 19, 2017 in Washington, DC.
Now playing
01:46
'Duck Dynasty' stars discuss raising biracial son on new show
FOX/"The Masked Singer"
Now playing
01:24
Nick Cannon makes big splash in 'Masked Singer' return
The Drew Barrymore Show/YouTube
Now playing
01:26
'Mom' star speaks out about not having kids in real life
Heinz ketchup packets are shown in New York on Monday, August 22, 2005. H.J. Heinz Co., the world's biggest ketchup maker, said first-quarter profit fell 19 percent on expenses to cut jobs and sell businesses.  (Photo by Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Heinz ketchup packets are shown in New York on Monday, August 22, 2005. H.J. Heinz Co., the world's biggest ketchup maker, said first-quarter profit fell 19 percent on expenses to cut jobs and sell businesses. (Photo by Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Now playing
01:53
Restaurants face a nationwide ketchup packet shortage
Camerota Berman both
CNN
Camerota Berman both
Now playing
02:33
CNN anchor Alisyn Camerota gets surprise tribute from co-anchor
Citigroup Chairman Richard Parsons delivers remarks on the US economy at the New York State Bar Association meetings in New York, January 28, 2009. Troubled US banking giant Citigroup last week named Parsons as its new chairman, the longtime top executive at media giant Time Warner, to steer it through its most challenging period.  AFP PHOTO / Emmanuel Dunand (Photo credit should read EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP via Getty Images)
EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/AFP via Getty Images
Citigroup Chairman Richard Parsons delivers remarks on the US economy at the New York State Bar Association meetings in New York, January 28, 2009. Troubled US banking giant Citigroup last week named Parsons as its new chairman, the longtime top executive at media giant Time Warner, to steer it through its most challenging period. AFP PHOTO / Emmanuel Dunand (Photo credit should read EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP via Getty Images)
Now playing
02:47
Dick Parsons: Georgia law is a bald-faced attempt to suppress Black vote
Courtesy of Warner Bros. Picture
Now playing
02:54
'Godzilla vs. Kong' is a pandemic box office hit
Now playing
01:30
5 ways to cut your plastic waste
CNN/Getty Images
Now playing
04:40
Stelter: After elevating Gaetz, Fox News barely covering scandal
NASA/Goddard/University of Arizona
Now playing
01:08
See NASA spacecraft successfully land on an asteroid
Now playing
06:51
Alisyn Camerota's kids wish her good luck in new role on CNN
(CNN) —  

To say that the last few weeks have been good for challengers to voting restriction laws across the country would be an understatement.

“It’s been like Christmas Day,” said Liz Kennedy of the liberal Center for American Progress.

Kennedy points to a cascade of rulings from several states that she says “stood up for the basic principle that all Americans deserve to have their voices heard at the ballot box without manipulation or suppression.”

The rulings include a federal appeals court opinion that invalidated key parts of a North Carolina law, a different appeals court decision softening a Texas photo ID law, a state district court in Kansas that temporarily enjoined a proof of citizenship requirement for state and local elections and another federal ruling that softened Wisconsin’s voter ID law.

The latest opinion came down on Monday when a federal judge in North Dakota granted a preliminary injunction requiring North Dakota to institute fail safe provisions in its voter ID law.

In some ways, the North Carolina ruling was the most expansive and powerful for liberal groups because the law was the first passed after the Supreme Court struck a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in 2013. That opinion sent liberals into despair and motivated Republican-led legislatures to pass new restrictive laws that they said would protect fair elections and combat voter fraud.

In an 83-page opinion, Judge Diana Gribbon Motz, writing for a three-judge panel of judges on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, referenced the fact that “immediately after” the Supreme Court issued the Shelby County decision, North Carolina’s General Assembly “vastly expanded an earlier photo ID bill and and rushed through the legislative process the most restrictive voting legislation seen in North Carolina since enactment of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.”

Motz said the new provisions of the law targeted “African-Americans with almost surgical precision.”

As soon as Motz’s opinion was released, GOP Gov. Pat McCrory, along with other supporters of the law, vowed to appeal either to a larger panel of judges on the appeals court or to the Supreme Court.

State Senate Leader Phil Berger and state House Speaker Tim Moore, both Republicans, said the opinion had been issued “by three partisan Democrats” and said that it “ignores legal precedent.”

For advocates of voting rights, however, the opinion symbolizes the work they’ve done in the years since the Supreme Court ruled in Shelby County v. Holder.

In that 5-4 case, the Supreme Court said that the coverage formula used to determine which states would be required to have the federal government review their voting changes was outdated and that Congress needed to act.

“Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the court’s opinion.

But critics immediately (and correctly) predicted said that the deeply divided Congress would never act, and they said the true effect of the decision would be to essentially gut the provision that required the federal government to “preclear” – or approve –any voting changes in certain states.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing a dissent on behalf of herself and her three liberal colleagues, lamented the majority’s opinion back in 2013.

“Throwing out pre-clearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet,” she wrote.

Allison Riggs, a senior attorney at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, says the North Carolina ruling and some of the other ones undermine Shelby.

“The majority’s opinion in Shelby stood for the proposition that things were much better, that we were practically in a post-racial society,” she said. “And now you’ve got federal judges saying that they are seeing a spate of laws that are racially discriminatory and have racially discriminatory effect.”

But supporters of the Shelby County decision see things differently.

The conservative Heritage Foundation’s Hans von Spakovsky says the North Carolina decision reflects that “pre-clearance was not necessary, that voting rights could be handled by traditional litigation.”

He also stressed that he believes the North Carolina decision was wrongly decided.

“There is no evidence of a discriminatory intent or effect on the part of the legislature,” he said.

Riggs dismisses the notion that so called “traditional litigation” is enough. While pleased with the recent opinions she believes Congress should act to restore the full Voting Rights Act.

“These challenges have come at a cost to the litigants, and to our democracy,” she said.