Activists demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2016, as the justices close out the term with decisions on abortion, guns, and public corruption are expected.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Activists demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, June 27, 2016, as the justices close out the term with decisions on abortion, guns, and public corruption are expected.
Now playing
02:16
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion law
Brooke Baldwin last show goodbye CNN newsroom vpx_00000217.png
CNN
Brooke Baldwin last show goodbye CNN newsroom vpx_00000217.png
Now playing
03:56
'Get a little uncomfortable': See Brooke Baldwin's last words on air
CNN
Now playing
02:56
Watch Anderson Cooper belly laugh with Cheri Oteri
Now playing
01:24
How Kyra Sedgwick got the cops called on Tom Cruise
Now playing
05:18
Anderson Cooper explains how he overcomes being shy
US Navy
Now playing
01:28
Pentagon confirms UFO video is real, taken by Navy pilot
Now playing
02:35
WWII veteran: End of the war was 'the biggest thrill of my life'
Fancy Feast/Purina
Now playing
01:06
Cat food company makes a cookbook ... for humans
Google Earth's new timelapse feature
Google
Google Earth's new timelapse feature
Now playing
01:09
Google Earth's new Timelapse feature shows 40 years of climate change in just seconds
Twitter | @brady9dream
Now playing
02:10
Pet owners pitch their pups to be dog brew's 'Chief Tasting Officer'
FOX/"The Masked Singer"
Now playing
01:23
'The Masked Singer' reveals identity of The Orca
LONDON, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 07:  A visual representation of the digital Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin on December 07, 2017 in London, England. Cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Lightcoin have seen unprecedented growth in 2017, despite remaining extremely volatile. While digital currencies across the board have divided opinion between financial institutions, and now have a market cap of around 175 Billion USD, the crypto sector coninues to grow, as it continues to see wider mainstreem adoption. The price of one Bitcoin passed 15,000 USD across many exchanges today taking it higher than previous all time highs.  (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Dan Kitwood/Getty Images
LONDON, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 07: A visual representation of the digital Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin on December 07, 2017 in London, England. Cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Lightcoin have seen unprecedented growth in 2017, despite remaining extremely volatile. While digital currencies across the board have divided opinion between financial institutions, and now have a market cap of around 175 Billion USD, the crypto sector coninues to grow, as it continues to see wider mainstreem adoption. The price of one Bitcoin passed 15,000 USD across many exchanges today taking it higher than previous all time highs. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Now playing
03:07
Bitcoin has an energy problem
The new all-electric Mercedes-EQS
Mercedes-Benz AG
The new all-electric Mercedes-EQS
Now playing
01:05
See the new all-electric EQS luxury sedan from Mercedes
Now playing
01:32
Scientists turned spiderwebs into music and it sounds like a nightmare
Jeopardy Productions, Inc.
Now playing
01:02
Aaron Rodgers' Green Bay Packers question stumps 'Jeopardy!' contestants
Now playing
05:18
Coinbase CFO: We're an on-ramp to the crypto economy

Story highlights

Snead: Supreme Court decision in Whole Woman's Health reflects what some call 'abortion distortion'

The Court has dealt a blow to state legislative authority to 'act according to their best judgment,' he says

Editor’s Note: O. Carter Snead is a professor of law and director of the Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame. A bioethicist who specializes in the governance of science, medicine and biotechnology in the name of ethical goods, he served as general counsel to the President’s Council on Bioethics from 2002-2005.

(CNN) —  

The Supreme Court’s decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt marks a dramatic escalation in the controversial jurisprudence of abortion. For more than 40 years, the high court has indulged the dubious proposition that the Constitution itself places unborn children beyond the protection of the law from the private violence of abortion.

O. Carter Snead
University of Notre Dame
O. Carter Snead

But before this decision, the Supreme Court would also at least permit states to adopt some ancillary measures that its elected officials believed would offer additional health and safety protections for women seeking abortions. So long as these regulatory side constraints on abortion were grounded in a legitimate state interest and rationally related to pursuing that goal, the court let them stand, provided they did not erect a substantial obstacle preventing the woman from exercising her final and decisive authority to obtain an abortion. For example, the court has affirmed abortion-related laws including parental involvement, waiting periods, informed consent requirements, and even bans on certain controversial abortion procedures. They upheld these statutes, even when they had the effect of making abortion more costly, time-consuming, or onerous to obtain.

When evaluating these measures, the high court did not substitute its own policy preferences for that of the state legislatures involved, nor did the court balance its own judgment of the law’s benefits against the burdens it imposed. They treated the law’s legitimacy and its burdensomeness as separate matters. In this way, the political branches of government retained at least some latitude to make abortion law and policy apart from interference from the judiciary.

01:27 - Source: CNN
The most important abortion case in decades

No more. Whole Woman’s Health changes the law, because it empowers a bare majority of justices with the authority to weigh the benefits (as they see them) of challenged abortion regulations against their burdens – a departure with ramifications far beyond the specific Texas law at hand. State legislators no longer enjoy the freedom to act according to their best judgment. Now, even in the absence of a developed factual trial record about the concrete effects of the challenged law (as in this case), the court can simply second-guess state legislatures and engage its own intuitive policy calculus to determine if the benefits of an abortion regulation outweigh its costs.

It is not hard to guess how justices who ardently support maximal abortion rights will decide such questions. Never mind that these same justices would never in any other context besides abortion credit a regulated industry’s claim that it should not be made to comply with duly enacted health and safety regulations because they are too costly.

In short, the court has declared that the U.S. Constitution empowers it to serve as, in the words of former Justice Byron White, “the country’s ex-officio medical board with powers to approve or disapprove medical and operative practices and standards throughout the United States” – a proposition that an earlier court wisely rejected in 1992 in the seminal case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey. It has stripped from states the authority to extend additional protections to women such as clinic safety standards or admitting privilege requirements for abortionists. This is a breathtaking misappropriation of power, without warrant in the text, history, or tradition of the U.S. Constitution. It is a devastating blow to the rule of law, to self-governance, to the authority of states to regulate the practice of medicine in the name of health and safety, and worst of all, to the inalienable dignity of unborn children and their mothers.

Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.
Read CNNOpinion’s new Flipboard magazine.

O. Carter Snead is a professor of law and director of the Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame. A bioethicist who specializes in the governance of science, medicine and biotechnology in the name of ethical goods, he served as general counsel to the President’s Council on Bioethics from 2002-2005.