The Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court sit for their official photograph on October 8, 2010, in Washington.
TIM SLOAN/AFP/Getty Images
The Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court sit for their official photograph on October 8, 2010, in Washington.
Now playing
02:46
Supreme Court to take up Obama immigration actions
Getty Images
Now playing
01:47
The GOP frontrunners on immigration: 1980 and today
immigration debate fact check border control orig_00003920.jpg
immigration debate fact check border control orig_00003920.jpg
Now playing
01:46
The debate over immigration
Now playing
02:10
Can a wall be built between U.S. and Mexico?
jan brewer immigration illegals trump intv lemon ctn bts_00001515.jpg
jan brewer immigration illegals trump intv lemon ctn bts_00001515.jpg
Now playing
03:31
Fmr. Ariz. Gov. Brewer: Everybody knows Trump is right
cnni judge blocks pres. obama immigration _00003018.jpg
Getty Images
cnni judge blocks pres. obama immigration _00003018.jpg
Now playing
01:32
Feds try to block immigration ruling
ac dnt griffin high cost of border drones_00004819.jpg
ac dnt griffin high cost of border drones_00004819.jpg
Now playing
05:18
Border patrol drones 'invaluable' or 'wasted money'?
tsr dnt johns obama texas immigration injunction _00003118.jpg
CNN
tsr dnt johns obama texas immigration injunction _00003118.jpg
Now playing
01:58
Texas judge blocks Obama's immigration action
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 19:  U.S. President Barack Obama speaks to members of the media during his last news conference of the year in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House December 19, 2014 in Washington, DC. President Obama faced questions on various topics including the changing of Cuba policy, the computer hack of Sony by North Korea, his executive action on immigration and his plan on working with a Republican majority Congress.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 19: U.S. President Barack Obama speaks to members of the media during his last news conference of the year in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House December 19, 2014 in Washington, DC. President Obama faced questions on various topics including the changing of Cuba policy, the computer hack of Sony by North Korea, his executive action on immigration and his plan on working with a Republican majority Congress. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Now playing
01:25
TX judge blocks Obama's immigration action
cnni judge blocks pres. obama immigration _00003018.jpg
Getty Images
cnni judge blocks pres. obama immigration _00003018.jpg
Now playing
00:48
Judge blocks Obama's order on immigration
DES MOINES, IA - JANUARY 24: U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaks to guests at the Iowa Freedom Summit on January 24, 2015 in Des Moines, Iowa. The summit is hosting a group of potential 2016 Republican presidential candidates to discuss core conservative principles ahead of the January 2016 Iowa Caucuses.
DES MOINES, IA - JANUARY 24: U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaks to guests at the Iowa Freedom Summit on January 24, 2015 in Des Moines, Iowa. The summit is hosting a group of potential 2016 Republican presidential candidates to discuss core conservative principles ahead of the January 2016 Iowa Caucuses.
Now playing
04:41
Cruz: President's executive amnesty is wrong
US customs and border patrol
courtesy US Customs and Border Patrol
US customs and border patrol
Now playing
02:54
Is immigration the engine of economic vitality?
sot ernst republican response sotu_00012320.jpg
sot ernst republican response sotu_00012320.jpg
Now playing
01:03
A GOP split on immigration?
cnnee la bestia pkg kay guerrero _00001023.jpg
cnnee la bestia pkg kay guerrero _00001023.jpg
Now playing
01:50
A look inside 'The Death Train'
secure the border lavandera orig jtb_00000130.jpg
secure the border lavandera orig jtb_00000130.jpg
Now playing
01:26
Can we REALLY secure the border?
ac dnt lavandera immigration facts_00003104.jpg
ac dnt lavandera immigration facts_00003104.jpg
Now playing
02:01
Border crisis: Just the facts

Story highlights

The Supreme Court said Tuesday it would hear a case regarding Obama's executive actions on immigration

Obama's actions are aimed at allowing millions of undocumented immigrants to apply for programs that could make them eligible for work authorization and associated benefits

(CNN) —  

The Supreme Court announced Tuesday that it will decide the fate of President Barack Obama’s immigration actions this term.

The actions are aimed at allowing millions of undocumented immigrants to apply for programs that could make them eligible for work authorization and associated benefits.

RELATED: Will the Supreme Court limit Obama’s executive power?

The President unveiled the programs over a year ago, but federal courts blocked implementation in response to a challenge brought by Texas and 25 other states. Since then, the nearly 4.3 million immigrants who would have been eligible have been caught in legal limbo.

The Supreme Court — which already has a docket bursting with consequential issues — will likely rule on the case by early summer. If the Court greenlights the programs that are considered a centerpiece of the President’s second term, they will go into effect before he leaves office.

RELATED: How Trump’s deportation plan failed 62 years ago

The Supreme Court’s ruling will come down in the midst of the presidential campaign and will settle an issue that has become a talking point for Republican candidates who say that the President exceeded his authority when he announced the programs.

At issue is the implementation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) aimed at the approximately 4.3 million undocumented immigrants who are parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, as well as an expansion of the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) targeting teenagers and young adults who were born outside of the U.S. but raised in the country.

The President’s actions allow eligible participants to obtain temporary lawful presence and apply for work authorization as well as some associated benefits.

“Millions of families have waited nearly a year for these programs to take effect,” said Karen Tumlin of the National Immigration Law Center. “They will now get a full day in court as the nation’s highest court hears this case of tremendous moral and legal importance.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has been leading the charge in court against the Obama administration, said that the unilateral actions are unconstitutional and that the administration also violated the Administrative Procedures Act, a law that sets forth how federal agencies can establish regulations.

“The Executive does have enforcement discretion to forbear from removing aliens on an individual basis,” Paxton argued in court papers, but that does not include “the power to deem unlawful conduct as lawful, or to change an alien’s statutory immigration classification.”

Nov. 2014: Clinton backs Obama’s immigration plan

Paxton said the programs represent one of the “largest changes in immigration policy in our Nation’s history” and that the state has the standing to bring the case in part because it will bear the burden and cost of issuing additional driver’s licenses.

In a statement out Tuesday, Paxton said that by taking up the case, the Supeme Court “recognizes the importance of the separation of powers.”

“As federal courts have already ruled three times, there are limits to the President’s authority, and those limits enacted by Congress were exceeded when the President unilaterally sought to grant ‘lawful presence’ to more than 4 million unauthorized aliens who are in this country unlawfully,” he said in a statement. “The Court should affirm what President Obama said himself on more than 20 occasions: that he cannot unilaterally rewrite congressional laws and circumvent the people’s representatives.”

The Obama administration says that the actions are a valid exercise of prosecutorial discretion and that Texas and the states lack the legal harm, called “standing,” to challenge them in Court.

Supreme Court Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli argued in court filings that if the lower court ruling is left undisturbed it will allow the states “to frustrate the federal government’s enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws.”

RELATED: Ted Cruz’s immigration reversal