Oral arguments over, justices decide fate of same-sex marriage case

Published 11:49 AM EDT, Fri May 1, 2015
Will Mullery/CNN
Now playing
01:56
Same-sex marriage at SCOTUS in less than two minutes
scotus same sex marriage decision celebration todd nr _00020518.jpg
scotus same sex marriage decision celebration todd nr _00020518.jpg
Now playing
02:10
Same-sex marriage celebrated on Supreme Court steps
Jim Obergefell speaking on steps of Supreme Court
Jim Obergefell speaking on steps of Supreme Court
Now playing
01:51
Plaintiff: Our love is equal
Now playing
02:20
U.S. 21st country to allow same-sex marriage nationwide
kentucky clerk kim davis appeal dnt casarez lead_00000307.jpg
WKYT
kentucky clerk kim davis appeal dnt casarez lead_00000307.jpg
Now playing
02:12
Supporters gather in solidarity for Kentucky clerk
history of gay rights movement cooper dnt ac_00022216.jpg
history of gay rights movement cooper dnt ac_00022216.jpg
Now playing
04:15
What you need to know about the gay rights movement
WLEX
Now playing
01:22
Attorney: Kim Davis 'has no intention' of resigning
kentucky gay marriage clerk counsel lead intv_00020630.jpg
kentucky gay marriage clerk counsel lead intv_00020630.jpg
Now playing
03:18
Counsel: Ky. clerk wants her name off marriage license
kim davis marriage license contempt hearing ATH_00011020.jpg
Getty Images
kim davis marriage license contempt hearing ATH_00011020.jpg
Now playing
01:26
Santorum: Kim Davis is heroic
kim davis marriage license contempt hearing ATH_00011301.jpg
Getty Images
kim davis marriage license contempt hearing ATH_00011301.jpg
Now playing
01:24
Kentucky clerk in court over marriage license refusal
heated confrontation clerk denying marriage licenses kentucky pkg_00003430.jpg
WKYT
heated confrontation clerk denying marriage licenses kentucky pkg_00003430.jpg
Now playing
00:58
Heated confrontation with clerk denying marriage licenses
Courtesy David Moore
Now playing
01:09
Clerk defies judge, denies men marriage license
texas county clerk same sex marriages nobles dnt ac_00002409.jpg
texas county clerk same sex marriages nobles dnt ac_00002409.jpg
Now playing
02:05
Texas-sized battle over same-sex marriage
same-sex marriage what's next supreme court jeffrey toobin orig_00004124.jpg
same-sex marriage what's next supreme court jeffrey toobin orig_00004124.jpg
Now playing
01:49
What's next for same-sex marriage?
same sex marriage opposition tapper dnt lead _00005329.jpg
same sex marriage opposition tapper dnt lead _00005329.jpg
Now playing
03:18
Texas counties refuse marriage license for gay couples
jim obergefell president obama phone call same-sex marriage_00002414.jpg
jim obergefell president obama phone call same-sex marriage_00002414.jpg
Now playing
01:35
Obama calls same-sex marriage case plaintiff on live TV
same sex marriage obama supreme court decision_00015614.jpg
same sex marriage obama supreme court decision_00015614.jpg
Now playing
02:54
Obama: We've made our union a little more equal
Supporters of same-sex marriages gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court waiting for its decision on April 28, 2014 in Washington, D.C.
Mladen Antonov/AFP/Getty Images
Supporters of same-sex marriages gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court waiting for its decision on April 28, 2014 in Washington, D.C.
Now playing
01:06
Supreme Court: Same-sex marriage legal nationwide
(CNN) —  

Quiet has returned to the Supreme Court. For now.

The plaza has been swept clear of debris from the same-sex marriage demonstrations that took place earlier in the week. Sleeping bags – left behind by those who spent nights on the sidewalk, hoping for a seat at the historic oral arguments – have been removed. The chanting between dueling sides of the debate is just a faint echo.

The case has been made over whether states are required to license same-sex marriages and recognize those nuptials performed in other jurisdictions. Now it’s up to the justices.

RELATED: Supreme Court justices skeptical of redefining marriage

If tradition holds, they will gather in the court’s conference room on Friday to discuss and possibly cast an initial vote on one of the most historic cases to come before the Roberts Court. At conference, Chief Justice John Roberts leads off the discussion, and then one by one, in order of seniority, the justices are likely to reveal how they intend to vote. The court won’t confirm the subject of a particular conference, but typically the Friday conference of an argument week is devoted to the cases heard the previous Tuesday and Wednesday.

The golden rule at conference is that no one is allowed to speak twice until every justice has spoken once. Justice Elena Kagan, the court’s junior member, will go last, and she is also charged with answering the door if a law clerk or staff member were to send a message. Only justices are allowed in the room, and for a period of time, they alone will know the likely outcome of the case brought by 14 couples and two widowers who hope to clear the way for same-sex couples to marry nationwide.

In an interview with C-SPAN in 2009, Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose vote will most likely be crucial in the same-sex marriage case, spoke about the court’s conferences and admitted to being nervous going in.

“It’s like being an attorney once again,” he said, referring to the process of presenting his position. “As we go around the table, it can be quite fascinating to see how the case is unfolding.”

He added that the atmosphere can be tense if the court is closely divided.

RELATED: How a Cincinnati judge could shape the gay marriage case

“If a case is close, 5-4, and let’s say you are on the side that prevailed with the majority, there are not a lot of high fives and back slaps. There is a moment of quiet, a moment of respect, maybe even awe at the process. We realize that one of us is going to have to write out a decision which teaches and gives reasons for what we do. “

The same-sex marriage arguments that occurred on Tuesday lasted for two and a half hours. The justices shot dozens of questions at a total of five different lawyers.

The next day, during oral arguments in Glossip v. Gross, a case over lethal injection, the justices seemed unusually irritable, cutting each other off and interrupting the lawyers. It was, perhaps, a sign of fatigue.

At one point, Roberts referenced the interruptions and suggested that the justices were not letting the lawyers make their case.

“To an extent, that’s unusual, even in this court,” Roberts told a lawyer with a hint of irritation. “You have been listening rather than talking.”

He granted the advocate more time, adding, “Hopefully, we’ll have a chance to hear what you have to say.”

By Thursday, same-sex marriage advocates around Washington were left to speculate about whether the court was swayed toward their cause.

Some were clearly concerned by the opening few minutes. They had entered the chamber full of optimism based on the fact that Justice Anthony Kennedy has already written three opinions in favor of expanding same-sex rights.

RELATED: Will John Roberts’ anger conservatives again?

But that optimism faded as Kennedy joined with other conservatives in expressing some skepticism about changing the definition of marriage.

“This definition has been with us for millennia,” Kennedy said.

“He succeeded in making everybody feel less than certain,” said Paul M. Smith, a lawyer from Jenner & Block who argued and won a key gay rights case in 2003 and is considered one of the most knowledgeable advocates on the issue in the country.