03:51 - Source: CNN
Should Affleck's slavery connection have been censored?

Editor’s Note: Dorothy A. Brown is a professor of law at Emory University and author of “Critical Race Theory: Cases, Materials, and Problems.” The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

Story highlights

Dorothy Brown: Ben Affleck and Henry Louis Gates scrubbed segment about Affleck's slave-owning ancestors from TV show

She says they two missed a chance to discuss racial issues that still fester in this country

CNN  — 

The cover-up is often worse than the crime.

Henry Louis Gates stands accused of scrubbing part of a segment in his PBS documentary series “Finding Your Roots” because the actor Ben Affleck put pressure on him. Affleck’s concern was that the segment would have aired his family’s dirty laundry, which includes a slaveholding ancestor, Benjamin Cole.

Dorothy A. Brown

Affleck said, in a statement posted on Facebook, that he “didn’t want any television show about my family to include a guy who owned slaves. I was embarrassed.” And Gates later explained that he subbed that part of the segment for another that made for more “compelling television.”

But providing a window into the importance of slavery’s past to America’s present should never just be about what makes for good television. Gates missed an opportunity.

And Affleck’s initial reluctance to acknowledge his truth (an impulse, he said on Facebook, he regrets) is surprising. Last month, Affleck lent his star power to support continued foreign assistance for the Democratic Republic of Congo by testifying before Congress.

He isn’t shy about aligning himself with causes and issues. What more could he do if his instinct is also to tackle issues closer to home: the legacy of slavery in his own family tree and how it is possible – necessary – to reject the racism passed through generations even today. He should have shown the courage to stay in an uncomfortable place. What a teachable moment for the country.

In any case, why did he agree to do a television show if he was concerned about what might be discovered? He could have paid a genealogist to uncover his ancestry, if privacy was what he wanted.

The irony here is that none of this would have ever been found out if Sony’s emails had not been hacked and if Gates hadn’t written to Michael Lynton, CEO of Sony Entertainment, for advice.

In the leaked exchange, Lynton advised: “I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky.” Gates acknowledges that to delete the segment at the request of a guest “would be a violation of PBS rules.” Then he does it anyway.

Gates, however, denies doing this. After the story came to light, he released a statement saying that he “maintained editorial control” and decided what made “for the most compelling program.” For Affleck’s “Finding Your Roots” segment, he substituted a Revolutionary War ancestor instead of the slave-owning one.

If Gates thought there was no need for the slavery segment because it didn’t make for good television, there would have been no need to consult with Lynton; Gates could have given Affleck what he wanted because he made the assessment of how strong Affleck’s story was. The original script, reprinted on Gawker and elsewhere, makes it clear, however, that the slave-owner angle makes for better television.

Here are some excerpts:

Gates sets up the segment describing Benjamin Cole as living in Savannah, Georgia. Affleck responds that he has a house in Savannah. Gates says “Really?” and asks whether he knew he had roots there. Affleck says he had no idea he had any Southern roots at all. Then the voice-over lowers the boom: “We wanted to see if we could learn how Ben’s ancestor felt about (slavery).” Gates shows the slave schedule of the 1850 Census to Affleck, who says, “There’s Benjamin Cole, owned 25 slaves.”

Affleck says, “It gives me a kind of sagging feeling to see, uh, a biological relationship to that. But you know, there it is, part of our history.” Gates then says: “But consider the irony, in your family line. Your mom went back fighting for the rights of black people in Mississippi, 100 years later. That’s amazing.” Affleck then observes: “Indeed, people like my mother and many others who have made a much better America than the one that they were handed.”

What a great line. What a great story.

And indeed when a public figure – a celebrity – chooses to confront the past like this, instead of ignoring it, he can provide a powerful example to a country that struggles daily with the roots of racism in its present.

This is the kind of enlightened approach Gates and PBS should have been interested in facilitating. White Americans’ lack of comfort in talking about slavery, race and the places in our society where racism continues to fester is at the heart of why even with a black president, we are still, as a country, far from post-racial.

Affleck’s segment had the potential to continue an important dialogue – but the brand management part of Affleck won, and the rest is history.

The fallout continues. Gates has to deal with PBS and WNET’s internal review. He should not walk away without consequences. If you’re going to run with the megastars, you need to have mega-ethics.

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.

Join us on Facebook.com/CNNOpinion.

Read CNNOpinion’s new Flipboard magazine.