There are no reliable statistics on how many times a police officer killed someone in the line of duty
Black newspaper executives feel spate of videos lends credibility to black victims' versions of events
Warning from one chief: "Don't paint your whole police department as bad guys"
It feels like every week, a name is added to the list: another man, often black and unarmed, has died at the hands of police.
The headlines make it feel as if the country is experiencing an unprecedented wave of police violence, but experts say that isn’t the case. We’re just seeing more mainstream media coverage, and for a variety of reasons.
Let’s be clear: That’s just each expert’s sense of things. We rely on hunches because real numbers don’t exist, likely because no one thought it important to keep a tally until recently.
Chat with a publisher or editor at one of the country’s African-American newspapers, and she or he can tell you they’ve been covering these cases for a long time.
“We’ve been in business for 130 years,” said Robert Bogle, president and CEO of The Philadelphia Tribune, without a hint of sarcasm.
“What is being exposed nationally is something that’s been troubling us in Philadelphia as African-Americans,” he said. “Yes, we have written about it. We’ve talked about it. This is the African-American experience, and for some reason non-African-Americans don’t believe it.”
They’re starting to believe it, thanks to cell phones, said Cedric Alexander, the DeKalb County, Georgia, deputy COO of public safety and president of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives.
“Black and brown people have been making these complaints for years, but they fell on deaf ears because no one wanted to believe some officers would act that way,” he said.
After video of Cleveland police killing the 12-year-old Rice outside a recreation center, New York police choking Garner as he cried “I can’t breathe” and Scott being repeatedly shot in the back as he fled an officer, the public’s skepticism is waning, he said.
People are realizing, “Wow, they really did shoot this guy in the back. Wow. Oh, s**t, there’s some truth to this,” Alexander said.
Black newspaper executives feel the videos lend credibility not only to black victims’ versions of events in specific situations, but also to their versions of events historically. Where a victim’s race could affect a story’s perceived veracity, video permits no such prejudice.
Alexander concurred, citing a common dilemma for inner-city kids: “If police say that’s what happened and you don’t have something to prove otherwise, you’re screwed.”
Had there been no video of Scott’s shooting, Bogle said, the public might have believed Officer Michael Slager’s story that he’d been attacked and had no choice but to fatally shoot Scott.
The video, though, taken by a bystander who happened upon the incident, showed Scott running as Slager shot him in the back. Slager now stands charged with Scott’s murder.
“When you have clear evidence that would contradict a different story, it’s difficult to engage in denial,” Bogle said.
Added Publisher Tracey Williams-Dillard of the Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder, another African-American newspaper: “Things are being recorded by others. There’s now no way it can be disputed.”
Where are the numbers?
Today, it seems like there’s a stat for everything.
Want to know the most common offense for which people are incarcerated? No problem. Need to know the percentage of fatal plane crashes caused by pilot error? Easy. The score of every Monday Night Football game since 1990? A breeze.
But if you want to know how many times a police officer has killed someone in the line of duty, you’re out of luck.
“It’s really ridiculous we don’t have that count,” said David Klinger, an associate criminology professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. “For whatever reason, the powers that be that collect data for the feds … decided that how often police kill people doesn’t matter.”
Despite that the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 required the government to keep “data about the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers,” no such database exists. A study published 14 years ago sought to nail down numbers, but its author conceded to CNN that only 564 of the nation’s 18,000 law enforcement entities participated.
The closest thing to a statistic is the FBI’s assertion that police were responsible for about 400 “justifiable homicides” annually between 2008 and 2012.
Even if there were an accurate count, Klinger said, we’d still be “missing a huge part of the picture when it comes to deadly force.” Cops tend to shoot to kill – and gunfire is the predominant means by which police kill suspects – so more illuminating would be knowing how many times police opened fire, period, he said.
Can videos end cycle?
Bogle doesn’t need statistics, he said. It wasn’t many generations ago that black Americans could not find justice in lynchings and other racially motivated crimes, he said, explaining that extrajudicial killings by police are just a continuation.
“Black Americans and black Philadelphians have been talking about and addressing these issues, to no avail,” he said. “There’s no way to actually determine that there’s more or less. What’s occurred is there are more ways to expose it.”
Not only are we in a better position to capture video of police misbehavior today, we’re also better equipped to disseminate the footage. Instantaneity is important, he said.
Events that 10 years ago would’ve come down to a suspect’s word versus an officer’s are now recorded on cell phones and officers’ body and dashboard cameras. And where a news reporter could have taken days to travel to a city, find and interview witnesses and obtain a police narrative, a bystander can post video of a police encounter to the Internet minutes after it happens.
“That’s critical. If you see an incident a week later, that has an impact on the reaction,” Bogle said. “It’s not a timely event, and people’s reactions are different.”
Because humans are visual creatures, videos impact people more than might a written or spoken narrative, and many experts feel the images help drive coverage of the incidents.
“It not only feels like there’s more coverage, there is more coverage. … It’s not a perception, it’s definitely real,” Williams-Dillard said.
Don’t expect the videos to be a panacea for the violence, said Klinger, who counts police use of force among his research interests. Yes, video can refute a lie, but just as police have lied about suspects, suspects have lied about police as well.
“Most of the time when there’s video, it demonstrates the officer did the right thing,” he said. “I think it’s going to cut both ways. … We’re going to have a bunch of cried wolf.”
A ‘sensitized’ nation?
People’s attitudes are changing as well, said Irv Randolph, managing editor of The Philadelphia Tribune. Not only do you have people as influential as Attorney General Eric Holder speaking out, but civil rights is “front and center in terms of what young people are protesting against.”
Look no further than the rallies for Trayvon Martin, the teen killed in 2012 by a Florida neighborhood watch volunteer, or Scott in North Charleston. The protests drew diverse crowds, Randolph noted.