Van Jones: The fictional world of "Hunger Games" is like an extreme version of America
Jones: Themes of crushing inequality, unaccountable governance resonate with us
He says movie is a more sweeping critique of inequality than Elizabeth Warren's speech
Jones: It is a Hollywood version of how the 1% makes society harder for the 99%
Editor’s Note: Van Jones is president and founder of Rebuild the Dream, an online platform focusing on policy, economics and media. He was President Barack Obama’s green jobs adviser in 2009. He is also founder of Green for All, a national organization working to build a green economy. Follow him on Twitter @VanJones68. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the writer.
The latest installment of the epic “Hunger Games” series hit theaters this Friday, and it promises to be the year’s biggest blockbuster yet.
You can chalk up a lot of these films’ popularity to the star power of leading actress Jennifer Lawrence. Certainly, the great action scenes and special effects do not hurt, either. But the real reason “Hunger Games” has captured public imagination is that its fictional world of Panem is, in so many ways, an extreme version of our own America.
For those who have not seen the movies or read the books, the “Hunger Games” tells the story of a young woman – Lawrence’s Katniss Everdeen – and her defiance of her society’s wealthy, exploitative ruling elite. These elite, the dastardly “Capitol,” reinforce their power by making the children of oppressed regions battle to the death in what are called “Hunger Games.”
It is a far-fetched fairy tale. But if you get caught up in the details of the story, you might miss themes – crushing inequality, unaccountable governance, violence against children – that resonate with the daily lives of millions of Americans.
These books and films are not popular because we want to escape to Katniss Everdeen’s world. They are a phenomenon because we suspect her world is our own.
In the world of the “Hunger Games,” the Capitol lives a life of extravagant wealth and consumption. Meanwhile, out in the “districts,” millions of people work dangerous jobs with low pay. As the Capitol wallows in excess, the districts can barely afford to feed their children.
To put it another way, the year’s biggest box-office blockbuster is a more sweeping indictment of inequality than an Elizabeth Warren speech.
It is a tale of how the worst of the 1% pull up the ladders of opportunity behind them, and hoard wealth to such a degree that all of society is poorer for it. It is Occupy’s “We are the 99%,” on Hollywood’s big screen.
When Americans look around and see the top 25 hedge fund managers raking in $21 billion while their own paychecks get smaller and smaller, the imaginary world of Panem does not seem so far away. Is it any wonder that some striking workers at Walmart and McDonald’s have adopted the Hunger Games symbol of resistance, the three-finger salute? Or that people have begun sharing their own stories of economic distress with the #MyHungerGames hashtag on Twitter?
The parallels do not stop there. Everdeen’s District 12 is a coal-mining district, feeding the rapacious energy demands of the Capitol but receiving little in return but fouled lungs and poisoned skies.
In the 2014 elections, polluters spent more than $100 million to buy themselves a compliant Congress. This week, members of both parties have returned the favor by voting in favor the Keystone XL pipeline, which would put tar in our rivers and carcinogens in our drinking water.
Americans get 35 permanent jobs and fewer than 4,000 temporary jobs at a huge risk to public health. Energy companies would profit by shipping tar sands through America to consumers abroad. The Capitol would be proud.
Also, consider the Hunger Games’ District 11. After one of that district’s children dies in the “Hunger Games,” the mostly black region is the first to rise up in protest against the contest. The Capitol responds not by asking whether this cruel system makes any sense, or whether they simply erred along the way. Instead, they turn District 11 into a militarized police state.
Nonviolent protestors gather. Riot police stand by threateningly. Residents raise their hands in the air in a potent symbol of freedom. The police cracks down brutally.
It should look like science fiction. Instead, compare these images. It looks just like Ferguson.
And of course, we cannot overlook the very idea of “Hunger” games, at a time when one in every six Americans struggles to get enough to eat.
The “Hunger Games” is not just some liberal diatribe. It is also the story of an out-of-control state, distant and untouchable, exploiting the labor and lives of millions of citizens. Even as progressive populists see it as a cautionary tale of hoarding and excess, conservatives view the “Hunger Games” as a narrative of big government run amok.
The likes of AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka toss three-finger salutes, while the Odds in Our Favor campaign combats inequality. But at the same time, conservative activists invoke the “Hunger Games” to deride an unaccountable and tax-obsessed federal government.
We live in a time when we can all agree that our large institutions are failing us and even threatening our children. We seem so divided only because we cannot agree on which institutions are most to blame.
That is the true secret to the popularity of the “Hunger Games.” We can all see our stories in its sweeping plot line of oppression and rebellion. We know that the “Hunger Games” is just a fantasy. But when its world feels so frighteningly real, we cannot help rooting for Katniss Everdeen to win.