Janet Copeland remarried says she's using life savings to pay for health insurance premiums
Copeland and husband disagree about Affordable Care Act
Conservatives say implementing health care law at state level could bankrupt the country
Health care law supporters say this election "is the most important in U.S. history"
Editor’s Note: Embed America is a partnership between CNN Radio and CNN iReport. This series tells the story of the 2012 U.S. presidential election through the people most critical to the campaigns: the voters. CNN Radio is traveling across the country to interview iReporters on election issues close to their hearts. These issues were named important by iReporters during phase 1 of the iReport Debate.
Janet Copeland and her husband, Richard, both say they agree almost all the time, with one exception: The Affordable Care Act, President Barack Obama’s health care legislation.
“We’re kind of split on that one,” Janet says. “It’s one of the few heated discussions we have. Right now, I’m at the point where I’ve already told (Richard) that ‘OK, if the person you want gets elected, sit back and watch.’ We’re in a little standoff about that one. There’s never blood drawn, but it gets interesting.”
Richard Copeland, a 62-year-old retired Army veteran, just rolls his eyes.
“I did not like the way it was shoved down our throats,” Richard responds. “What about the people that can’t afford health insurance? What part of not being able to afford it doesn’t our president understand? There are people out there working just to put bread on the table, and now he’s saying ‘I don’t care if your family eats or not.’ “
Richard’s wife is having a hard time paying her health insurance.
According to Families USA, a liberal-leaning health insurance advocacy group, Janet Copeland’s situation is common. Families USA reported that before the passage of the ACA, some 2.3 million American families lost their health care each year because of price. The group believes the ACA will help families from being priced out of health insurance coverage.
He says it’s unfair to penalize his wife if she decides not to pay for coverage. He supports GOP candidate Mitt Romney. And Richard has health insurance through the Veterans Administration. But Janet, who is quickly using up her life savings to pay her monthly health premium, is fully supportive of Obamacare, and supports Democratic President Barack Obama in his re-election bid.
But in ironic fashion, the reason this debate has come to the Copeland household is because the couple decided to get married.
After getting married, the couple moved into a ranch style home on the banks of Lake Conway, just north of Little Rock. But before they started a life together, Janet Copeland was married for almost 50 years. The Arkansas native married her ex-husband at age 15. Janet raised two children, maintained the house, and painted portraits and landscapes on the side.
“I held one job during my marriage, working as an art instructor,” Janet says. “It wasn’t for very long, and it wasn’t for many hours per week.”
After a long, unhappy marriage, Janet got divorced in her mid-60s. During the separation, Janet learned she did not work enough during her life to qualify for Social Security or reduced cost Medicare. So, she negotiated with her ex-husband, and he agreed to give her a small lump sum of money, along with subsidizing her health care premiums. While she was single, Janet Copeland paid just over $200 per month.
“Then I got married, and the whole thing changed,” Janet says.
Now, she pays $703 per month. When she remarried, Janet’s ex-husband no longer paid any part of her health premium. She couldn’t qualify for Medicaid, the government’s health care program for the poor, because she had to count Richard’s retirement income of about $2000 per month. So, Janet had to turn to her life savings.
“What I do is I’ve got it set up where I get $1,000 a month, it’s like a trust, to pay my insurance and everything else,” Janet says. “It won’t last me for a lifetime, I think, but right now, my insurance is taken care of.”
What’s important about Janet Copeland’s story, says Anthony Wright, is that it illustrates how routine life changes can dramatically change individual health care costs. Wright is the executive director of Health Access, a California-based nonpartisan, not-for-profit think tank.
“A family’s health insurance rate can change for a variety of reasons, both a birth in the family, a death in the family, a divorce,” says Wright. “Even somebody just doing the very natural thing of reaching (their) birthday. One of the worst birthday presents you can receive is a rate increase from your health insurer.”
The presidential candidates each offer dramatically different policies on how to handle rate changes. In the most general terms, Wright says, Obama’s signature health care law makes it harder to increase rates for routine life changes, while GOP candidate Mitt Romney wants to repeal that law entirely.
“We’ve always had candidates with different proposals, but we’ve never had an election which would really determine whether a whole set of benefits and consumer protections were at stake, where the line was so clearly drawn,” he adds.
Wright says Janet Copeland could benefit from some of the provisions of the Affordable Health Care act, like the expansion of Medicaid. The health care program serves low income citizens, and is run jointly by the federal government and the states.
Yet, it’s unclear how those provisions will be applied in the Copeland’s home state of Arkansas. Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe will ultimately have to approve any expansion of Medicaid and Medicare in his state. Those are the provisions most likely to help Janet Copeland lower her Medicare premiums. Yet, the Democratic governor has issued statements indicating he is still studying the law and the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
Many Arkansas Republicans have taken the position of Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. The former GOP presidential candidate has long argued that Obamacare provisions, like expanding Medicaid, will bankrupt individual states.
Perry, like Richard Copeland, also disagrees with the health care law on philosophical grounds.
“I will not be party to socializing health care and bankrupting my state in direct contradiction to our Constitution and our founding principles of limited government,” Perry said in a statement shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled Obamacare is constitutional, Anthony Wright of Health Access says the outcome of this presidential election will determine whether the law is ultimately fully enforced. From a health care perspective, Wright says this election is “the most important” in U.S. history.
Yet, despite the potential importance this election may have on their day-to-day lives, Janet and Richard Copeland may decide, as a couple, simply not to vote.
“We’ll just end up canceling each other out,” Janet says. “But if we do decide to skip the vote, at least we’re doing it together. Life is better with someone you love.”