Vicky Triponey spoke to investigators in their probe of the Jerry Sandusky scandal
She was one of few who stood up to legendary Penn State coach Joe Paterno, and she lost her job
She was called too aggressive, too confrontational and not a good fit with "the Penn State way"
She often clashed with Paterno over who should discipline football players
Vicky Triponey knows all too well the power Penn State’s late football coach, Joe Paterno, held for more than half a century over the insular slice of central Pennsylvania that calls itself Happy Valley.
She experienced firsthand the clubby, jock-snapping culture, the sense of entitlement, the cloistered existence. It’s what drove her five years ago from her job as the vice president who oversaw student discipline.
She was told she was too aggressive, too confrontational, that she wasn’t fitting in with “the Penn State way.”
She clashed often with Paterno over who should discipline football players when they got into trouble. The conflict with such an iconic figure made her very unpopular around campus. For a while, it cost Triponey her peace of mind and her good name. It almost ended her 30-year academic career.
Another person might have felt vindicated, smug or self-righteous when former FBI Director Louis Freeh delivered the scathing report on his eight-month investigation of the Jerry Sandusky child abuse scandal. But Triponey sensed only a deep sadness.
The inquiry, commissioned by the board of trustees, exposed how the personal failings of Paterno and three other Penn State leaders – along with the university’s football-first culture – empowered an assistant football coach who molested fatherless boys for more than a decade.
“There’s no joy,” Triponey told CNN as she sat down for an interview Friday, the day after the Freeh report was released. She said she found solace in the public recognition of Penn State’s “culture of reverence for the football program,” as the report phrased it, and that it is “ingrained at all levels of the campus community.” Freeh found that the culture contributed to the Sandusky scandal.
She agrees with Freeh’s suggestion that the university’s trustees lead an effort to “vigorously examine and understand” Penn State’s culture, why it’s so resistant to outside perspectives and why it places such an “excessive focus on athletics.”
“It’s comforting to know that others can now understand,” Triponey said. “It didn’t have to happen this way.”
Her former boss at Wichita State University described Triponey as “a dedicated, ethical professional” who was devastated by her experience at Penn State.
“Vicky knew that she had attempted to do the right thing in disciplining the football players, but she was unable to do so in the Penn State environment,” said Gene Hughes, a president emeritus at Wichita State and Northern Arizona University.
At Penn State, Triponey was among the few who stood up to Paterno, the legendary “JoePa” who for 61 years was synonymous with a football program that pumped millions of dollars into Penn State. And she paid dearly for it. At the end, nobody at the top backed her. And it didn’t seem to matter to anyone whether she was right, or even if she had a point.
At the heart of the problem, the Freeh report stated, were university leaders eager to please Paterno above all else, a rubber-stamp board of trustees, a president who discouraged dissent and an administration that was preoccupied with appearances and spin.
Triponey has been saying that since 2005.
Sandusky, as the mastermind of college football’s legendary “Linebacker U,” enjoyed insider status and used Penn State’s sporting events and athletic facilities to lure victims even after he retired in 1999. When he was indicted and arrested in November, the report said, Sandusky still had his keys to the Penn State locker room.
Triponey, a slim blonde who dresses preppie and carries herself with the reserve of an academic lifer, was always an outsider at Penn State, even though she grew up in central Pennsylvania. She was not involved in the Sandusky matter; she says she never met him. But she is keenly aware of the campus culture that allowed him to prey on boys for years, virtually unchecked.
“The culture is deep,” she said. “The culture is making decisions based on how others will react, not based on what’s right and wrong.” It focused on the interests of those at “the top of the chain,” she added. “Others at the bottom didn’t matter.”
Triponey was just one of the 430 witnesses who spoke with Freeh’s investigators; her story, which she laid out for them over several hours in March, was supported by e-mails uncovered among the 3.5 million electronic documents the investigators examined.
“When I visited with them, that’s when I started to be more hopeful,” she said. “They got it, and they were determined to expose it. They found evidence of the culture that allowed Jerry Sandusky to exist.
“Now I can articulate it,” she said. “That is what I was railing against.”
Triponey is not named in the 267-page report; her experience is laid out in a footnote at the bottom of pages 65 and 66. The section deals with the janitors who were afraid they’d lose their jobs if they reported they’d seen Sandusky molesting a boy in the showers in 2000.
“I know Paterno has so much power that if he had wanted to get rid of someone, I would have been gone,” one janitor told investigators. “Football runs this university.”
“If that’s the culture at the bottom,” Freeh told reporters, “God help the culture at the top.”
The Triponey footnote sheds some light on the top. “Some individuals interviewed identified the handling of a student disciplinary matter in 2007 as an example of Paterno’s excessive influence at the university,” the footnote stated. It described “perceived pressure” to “treat players in ways that would maintain their ability to play sports,” including reducing disciplinary sanctions.
“I wasn’t part of the evidence. I was confirmation of the evidence,” Triponey told CNN. “This is not about me. This is about what Jerry Sandusky was allowed to do.”
Penn State can learn from its mistakes, she believes, but needs new leadership, fresh blood – someone from outside Happy Valley.
“It’s a cocoon. It’s a bubble. That’s why those inside the bubble are really struggling. They’re afraid; they’re embarrassed; they’re struggling with what to do,” she said.
“Now the question is, ‘do you face reality?’”
’The Penn State way’
Vicky Triponey grew up in a working-class household and was the first person in her family to attend college. Her father was a rabid Penn State football fan, but she chose to go to the University of Pittsburgh, commonly known as Pitt. She got her bachelor’s degree in psychology and continued with post-graduate studies, pursuing a career in higher education. She earned her doctorate at the University of Virginia.
She worked at several colleges and universities before encountering her mentor, James Rhatigan, who developed the division of student affairs at Wichita State University. Rhatigan introduced her to Mike Meacham, a young man who had been student body president and worked for the alumni association. They married 21 years ago.
She left Wichita in 1998 for the University of Connecticut, where she helped coach Randy Edsall build up the football program. Edsall, who is now head coach at the University of Maryland, told CNN that they worked hard to ensure that football players lived by the same rules as other students.
“We always taught our guys they weren’t better than somebody else,” Edsall said. “My whole thing was, we told our guys up front that there was a student code of conduct they had to adhere to. If they violated it, there would be consequences.”
Penn State recruited Triponey in 2003. She quickly figured out she was the leading candidate when the university brought on its A game for her interview. Her campus visit coincided with the weekend of “The Thon,” a popular dance marathon that students hold to raise money for charity.
“I liked what I heard during the interview,” she recalled. “It was a truly impressive place, and I considered it a fabulous next step in my career.”
She also heard the expression “the Penn State way” for the first time that weekend. Had she understood its significance, she said, she would have “quickly run in the other direction.”
Still, she enjoyed a long honeymoon. She felt she had the support of Penn State’s president, Graham Spanier, who unabashedly sang her praises when she was hired and later at professional conferences they both attended.
“I arrived there and was supported, encouraged, and really for the first two years I thought we were doing good things,” she said. “We were moving in some good directions. But that second year, in the fall, I started going home and telling Mike, ‘They’re not getting it. They’re not embracing conversations about change.’”
There were controversies about her decisions to cut off funding to a student radio program and revamp the student government.
Spanier assured her that she was right to stick to her guns, but she was “hitting the brick wall in student discipline.” Looking back, she says, “I was putting my neck out and taking a stand, but there weren’t many people with me.”
And then one day in late 2004, as disciplinary sanctions were being considered against a member of the football team, she received a visit from Paterno’s wife, who had tutored the player.
He’s a good kid, Sue Paterno said. Could they give him a break?
Triponey realized then that she wasn’t in Kansas anymore. Or even Connecticut.
By the next year, 2005, she was battling Paterno himself over who controlled how football players were disciplined. Paterno also chafed over enforcing Penn State’s code of conduct off campus.
Spanier called a meeting at which Paterno angrily dominated the conversation, Triponey recalled. She summarized the meeting in an e-mail to Spanier, Athletic Director Tim Curley and others, complaining that Paterno “is insistent that he knows best how to discipline his players” and that her department should back off.
She noted that Paterno preferred to keep the public in the dark about player infractions involving violence, and he pushed for not enforcing the student code of conduct off campus. She added that having “a major problem with Coach Paterno should not be our concern” in making disciplinary decisions.
“I must insist that the efforts to put pressure on us and try to influence our decisions related to specific cases … simply MUST STOP,” she wrote. “The calls and pleas from coaches, board members and others when we are considering a case are indeed putting us in a position that does treat football players differently and with greater privilege … and it appears on our end to be a deliberate effort to use the power of the football program to sway our decisions in a way that is beneficial to the football program.”
Curley, who once played for Paterno and according to the Freeh report was widely considered his “errand boy,” responded to Triponey by explaining “Joe’s frustrations with the system” and the “larger issues that bother him.”
Triponey wrote back, complaining about Paterno’s “disregard for our role and disrespect for the process.” She added, “I don’t see how we can continue to trust those inside the football program with confidential information if we are indeed adversaries.”
She followed up with another e-mail to Spanier on September 1, 2005, stating her objection to Paterno’s attitude and behavior, which she called “atrocious.” She said others, including students and their parents, were mimicking him.
“I am very troubled by the manipulative, disrespectful, uncivil and abusive behavior of our football coach,” she wrote. “It is quite shocking what this man – who is idolized by people everywhere – is teaching our students.”
Paterno clearly seemed to resent “meddling” from outsiders, even if Triponey was simply doing her job. She saw the dangers of special treatment that placed football players under a softer standard than other students lived by. She said it wasn’t right. But it was a battle she couldn’t win.
Paterno ridiculed her on a radio show as “that lady in Old Main” who couldn’t possibly know how to handle students because “she didn’t have kids.”
Tensions reached the breaking point in 2007 over how to discipline half a dozen players who’d been arrested at a brawl at an off-campus apartment complex. Several students were injured; one beaten unconscious.
Triponey met with Paterno and other university officials half a dozen times, although she preferred to remain neutral as the appeals hearing officer.
At the final meeting, Triponey urged the coach to advise his players to tell the truth. Paterno said angrily that he couldn’t force his players to “rat” on each other since they had to practice and play together. Curley and Spanier backed him up on that point, she said.