Story highlights

NEW: No deal will be reached before NATO summit, officials say

Pakistan is requesting $5,000 per truck for use of roads into Afghanistan, officials say

The supply routes were closed last November after a U.S. strike killed Pakistani soldiers

The roads will be essential for the drawdown of NATO troops in Afghanistan

Chicago CNN  — 

The United States and Pakistan will not reach a deal on opening NATO supply routes before coalition leaders meet on Sunday, two senior U.S. officials told CNN.

“There is no deal, and there won’t be one until President (Asif Ali) Zardari returns” to Pakistan, one senior official said, “and even that is not assured.”

The two sides had hoped to have a deal before Zardari arrived in Chicago this weekend to join NATO allies and other coalition partners for a meeting on Afghanistan.

“The main thing is to get a deal,” one senior official said. “It’s less important as to when.”

With no deal, officials said U.S. President Barack Obama would not meet with Zardari. The two leaders were to possibly meet in a trilateral meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai on the issue of political reconciliation in Afghanistan. Pakistan’s support in reaching a deal with the Taliban is seen as critical in ending the war in Afghanistan.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is expected to meet with Zardari in Chicago, the officials said.

Ahead of the NATO summit on Afghanistan’s future, Pakistan was requesting $5,000 per truck as a condition to reopen the supply lines between the two South Asian countries, U.S. officials said. The officials said Saturday that the United States would not agree to pay the stiff fees.

Opinion: Why ordinary Afghans worry about NATO summit

The new cost is a sticking point in weeklong negotiations between Washington and Islamabad to open the roads, known as the ground lines of communication or GLOCs. U.S. officials say the fees are inflated.

“We’re hopeful the GLOCs will be reopened soon, but we’re not going to agree to unreasonable charges. The Pakistanis understand that,” said a senior defense official who is not authorized to speak publicly about the talks.

Previously, the United States had been paying just a “small fraction” of the requested fee, officials said.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said the United States would refrain from such a deal due to budgetary restraints.

“Considering the financial challenges that we’re facing, that’s not likely,” Panetta told the Tribune newspaper service earlier in the week.

Pakistan shut down the supply routes – stretching from Afghanistan through the lawless western tribal regions of Pakistan and down to the southern port of Karachi – last November after dozens of its troops were killed in a mistaken U.S. airstrike.

Haqqani: Pakistan just wants to blame its neighbors

The routes offer a shorter and more direct route than the one NATO has been using since November that goes through Russia and other nations and avoids Pakistan altogether.

Pakistani Ambassador Sherry Rehman said Washington was paying more for the northern route.

“Perhaps, if you look at the end route where your trucks move through much longer, but I believe the double of that amount is paid,” Rehman said.

But U.S. officials said the nations along the northern route do not receive “Coalition Support Funds,” which should allow Pakistan to lower costs.

The supply route will take on more significance as NATO troops prepare to depart Afghanistan by 2014 and will have to move heavy equipment and supplies out of Afghanistan for shipment from Karachi.

The drawdown forms a big part of the agenda at the NATO summit in Chicago starting Sunday.

Pakistan did allow four trucks containing supplies destined for the U.S. Embassy in Kabul to cross its border Friday, the first in six months.

Rehman called it a first step.

“So this is a new beginning. And, obviously, I bring good tidings,” Rehman said.

But U.S. officials were less optimistic. Besides the cost, said one official familiar with the talks, there remained “quite a few other issues” to be worked out. He did not specify what those were.