ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
* TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
 SPACE
 HEALTH
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 ARTS & STYLE
 NATURE
 IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 myCNN

 Headline News brief
 news quiz
 daily almanac

  MULTIMEDIA:
 video
 video archive
 audio
 multimedia showcase
 more services

  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:

COMPUTING

Y2K figures hide hardware upgrades

January 10, 2000
Web posted at: 10:11 a.m. EST (1511 GMT)

by Carolyn Duffy Marsan

From...
Network World Fusion
Image

(IDG) -- The federal government's Y2K czar John Koskinen says the U.S. has spent $100 billion on the Y2K date change problem since 1995. But behind that eye-popping figure is an unspoken truth: a lot of the money went for equipment upgrades that had little to do with Y2K compliance.

"The figures we've been seeing for the costs of Y2K remediation are a little overblown," says Dale Vecchio, research director for application development at the Gartner Group of Stamford, Conn. "Companies may have spent millions, but they got a lot of IT modernization under the guise of Y2K remediation. Lots of organizations used Y2K as an excuse to upgrade their routers, their mainframes and their PCs from 486s to Pentium IIs."

Among the companies that bought new hardware in conjunction with their Y2K efforts is Virginia Power. The Richmond, Va. utility invested in client/server systems, networking equipment and Web development in parallel with its Y2K testing, according to chief information officer Lyn McDermid.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
IDG.net   IDG.net home page
  Y2K quotes of note
  Have we learned nothing from Y2K?
  Y2K expert says security is the next big challenge
  IDG.net's network operating systems page
  Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
  E-BusinessWorld
  Year 2000 World
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for network experts
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
  News Radio
  * Fusion audio primers
  * Computerworld Minute

"During the same three or four years that we were working on Y2K, we were building our distributed network. We were pretty much a mainframe shop before that,'' McDermid says. She adds that one advantage of doing both activities at that same time is that "we were able to employ the discipline of the Y2K remediation and testing as we built out the network."

Thomson Financial in Boston kept its Y2K and IT operations budgets separate, but individual IT groups still benefited from the extra funds. "As part of the Y2K effort, we were able to retire a few systems early," says senior messaging analyst Mike Green, who runs the company's global e-mail system. "It also gave us some halfway decent systems to set up a lab for testing new software and upgrades."

Did companies spend too much on Y2K? That's an impossible question to answer, says Tom Oleson, research director at International Data Corp., Framingham, Mass.

"The IT executive is the single most conservative person in the company because if their systems go down, the company is out of business,'' Oleson says. "I think they probably spent less than they could have on Y2K. They had the CEO coming in and saying 'Don't let my company fall apart.' They probably padded some of the budgets early on, but that's why most of them finished the job by midyear 1999. They spent the second half of the year just testing their systems." "Overall I think there was very conservative management of these projects," Oleson adds.

Regardless of whether Y2K investments were too large, everyone agrees that companies that upgraded their systems and networks are now in a better position than the competition. "Because of Y2K, many organizations are much better prepared to deal with the Internet and e-commerce than they were before," Vecchio says.


RELATED STORIES:
Opinion: Insidious glitches are real Y2K concern
January 6, 2000
Y2K bug briefly affected U.S. terrorist-monitoring effort, Pentagon says
January 5, 2000
Viruses anew pop up post-Y2K
January 5, 2000
De Jager defends Y2K hype
January 4, 2000
Forecast for 2000
December 29, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Y2K expert says security is the next big challenge
(Computerworld)
Y2K bug squashed, Feds say
(Infoworld)
All quiet on the year-2000 front
(Infoworld)
Will leap year be a problem?
(PC World)
Y2K quotes of note
(Computerworld)
Have we learned nothing from Y2K?
(Computerworld)
Opinion: It's hard to put a disastrous spin on a job well done
(Computerworld)
Year 2000 World
(IDG.net)
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

RELATED SITES:
U.S. Senate special committee on the Year 2000
Y2K site reviews
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.