Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Return to Gaza
The sweat trickled down my back. I was pulling a cart full of television gear and flak jackets, had a heavy rucksack with my laptop and a jumble of cables on my back, and a camera and two helmets in my free hand. Most of the sweat came from the intense heat, the clinging humidity and the exertion, but part of it from a tinge of tension. We were passing through the Erez crossing, from Israel in to Gaza.

I hadn't been there since January. The kidnapping of the BBC's Gaza correspondent Alan Johnston on 12 March had made the strip a no-go zone. That had kept us away, plus the vicious rounds of factional fighting between Hamas and Fatah, during which it was virtually impossible to report from Gaza in a meaningful way.

But Hamas' stunning victory in the final round of fighting, which ended on 15 June, had changed everything. Fatah had been roundly defeated, and my sources in Gaza told me we could return.

On the Israeli side of the crossing we had a bit of a wait, for reasons that weren't altogether clear—they rarely are. The scene once we passed through the final gate, remotely controlled by Israeli border security, was surreal.

Around a hundred people—mostly young men with a smattering of women and children, were huddled by the sides of the concrete corridor. There was a strong stench of sweat, urine, human excrement and rotting garbage. The people were mostly members of the defeated Fatah security services and their families, desperate to get out of Gaza.

When CNN Jerusalem cameraman Adil Bradlow raised his camera to capture the scene, many of the young men shouted for him not to film. Others covered their heads. But a few did speak with us, and let us film them, and told us Hamas was rounding up Fatah members and executing them.

Bilal Jaradan, a man in his late twenties, had served in Force 17, a Fatah security body. "Tell Abu Mazin (the nom de guerre of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas), to help us, to pay attention to us, to take care of us. We’re stuck here. We can’t go back because of Hamas, and if we go any closer to the Israeli gate, they'll shoot us." He had been in the passageway for six days, kept alive by food and water provided by the Israelis.

A bit further on, I met Khitam Ahmed, a young woman with three children, including a four-month-old baby who had a sickly, pale face and a strange, fixed stare. Her husband was also with Force 17, from the southern Gaza town of Rafah. She didn't know where he was, however, didn't have any contact with anyone, and like Bilal, begged me to get a message to Mahmoud Abbas to help them leave.

As I was speaking with Khitam, a crowd of boys, ranging between 9 and maybe 15 years old, began to gather around us. They asked the usual questions - "what network are you from?" "Where are you from?" "What is your name?"

I tried to ignore them, but they were oddly giddy. I asked one where he was from, and he said Beit Hanoun, a village on the border with Israel near the crossing.

As we left the stranded Fatah refugees behind and headed down the passageway, the boys tagged along with us. They were sticking close to us, and suddenly I saw that they were probing our defences, trying to open the zippers of my backpack, reaching for our mobile phones.

The usual Palestinian security forces that manned the crossing had abandoned their posts. Authority, law and order, had disappeared. I heard a loud banging of metal on metal. I looked overhead. A young man was trying to remove the metal beams that had held a plastic tarpon in place. Looters. Others had banged their way through the cement floor and were trying to pull up electric cables.

I was reminded of Iraq in the immediate aftermath of the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. All semblance of authority had vanished. Everything was for the taking. Kids who normally would be kept in line by adults were free to steal whatever they liked. And the young looters saw the moment of chaos as a chance to profit.

Erez is a mess, I thought. How will the rest of Gaza be?

Once we passed through the first checkpoint manned by Hamas gunmen, the atmosphere changed. There was order. And the deeper we went into Gaza City, I was struck by how calm the place was. There weren’t as many cars and people about as usual, but I could hear no gunfire, and some stores were open.

After dropping off the gear at our office, our first stop was the Saraya, the old security headquarters for Gaza built by the Israelis after 1967, taken over by Fatah-dominated Palestinian security forces in 1994, and captured by Hamas during the fighting. When we entered, I saw a man in uniform tinkering with the engine of an armoured personnel carrier. This was just a fraction of the mountain of weaponry, equipment and ammunition captured by Hamas.

Inside, we met briefly with Islam Shahwan, one of the leaders of Hamas' Executive Force. He was in a buoyant mood. "You’re welcome," he told me. "You are free to do whatever you like."

"And what about Alan Johnston, will he soon be released?" I asked.

"Any day now," he replied, his buoyancy evaporating. "We are working hard to win his freedom."

Alan, who I’ve known since he moved to Gaza three years ago, is believed to be held by the Daghmoush family, a powerful Gaza clan notorious for its criminal activities. Hamas has issued a string of deadlines for Alan to be released. So far, all those deadlines have passed.

Sources tell me the Daghmoush want guarantees that, if they release Alan, they will not be harmed. Hamas has promised not to punish them, but they don’t trust Hamas, and so continue to hold on to Alan.

Next we passed by the villa of Mohamed Dahlan, once Fatah's Gaza strongman, now residing in Ramallah on the West Bank. Dahlan was Hamas' arch-enemy, a man who, when he headed Palestinian Preventative Security, had mercilessly cracked down on Hamas during the 1990s, and was believed to be the point man in Fatah's attempt to scuttle the Hamas-led Palestinian government.

The villa's was a shambles. Doors and windows had been stripped, wiring yanked out from the walls. Everything that could be carried away was long gone. Three teenage boys were busy loading up a donkey cart with the marble flooring. Nothing better symbolised the utter humiliation of the men who were once the ruthless masters of Gaza.

What happened here is a revolution. For the first time in modern Arab history, a militant, revolutionary, Islamic movement has successfully and decisively overthrown the established Arab order. It was made possible by a variety of factors, including direct and indirect assistance from Syria and Iran, and by a single-minded determination to crush Fatah.

But the victory wouldn't have been possible if Fatah hadn't done such a miserable job of managing the affairs of Gaza in particular and the Palestinians in general over the years.

When the leadership of Fatah returned to Gaza and the West Bank after decades in exile following the Oslo Accords in 1993, they seemed more determined to profit from the new era than create a viable Palestinian entity.

Their rule was characterised by blatant corruption, mismanagement, heavy-handed oppression and nepotism—all the ills that have plagued the modern Arab world. They're the same ills that the Islamic movement—whether it be the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the Islamic Action Front in Jordan or Hezbollah in Lebanon—has been able to capitalise on. Hamas proved its political power and popularity when it trounced Fatah in Palestinian parliamentary elections in January 2006. And it has matched its political prowess with military might by crushing Fatah this month, even though Fatah outmanned and outgunned Hamas.

But Fatah's security force—charged with protecting the established order—simply didn’t have the conviction or the will to stand their ground and fight.

Most of Fatah's leadership in Gaza had long ago fled to the relative safety of the West Bank, leaving junior officers and their men to face a foe that believes God is on its side. Not surprisingly, almost every regime in the Arab world is terrified by what happened in Gaza, and is scrambling to do whatever they can to shore up the bruised and battered leadership of Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank. They see themselves in Mahmoud Abbas, and know that the forces that bolster them could, if faced by a determined, focused, well-organised, and well-armed Islamic opposition, crumble just as easily.

That's the big picture. For many Gazans, the return of order is a positive change, or at least a relief after more than a year of sporadic and intensifying factional fighting.

“It's better now,” Ahmed, an old friend, told me. “The fighting has stopped. We feel much safer. The problem is no one knows what will happen next. We don’t know if Israel will allow food in. We don’t know if Israel will continue to provide petrol or electricity. Today things are fine. But tomorrow? We just don’t know.”

And that seems to be the worry of most people in Gaza. The future only gets foggier. It’s a tiny, overcrowded patch land that always seems to be going somewhere, but never arriving. One period of uncertainty is followed by another, and another and another.

From Ben Wedeman, CNN Jerusalem Correspondent
Ben, why don't you just get the Hamas flag out and wave it. Any western government would love such praise.
My God, I think I've got it. The Arab street finally has a Arab victory however small, vicarious and meaningless to their own lives.

And what passes for mainstream media reporting comes from the PR packages of H and H if not AQ, and Arab editorials.

Hamas = Heroes = Happiness is garbage and an "independent" Gaza is short lived but will be remembered as glorious nonetheless, bloodbath of martyrs or slow starvation whatever.

What comes after will be a buildup of the area by the little quartet (Israel, Egypt, Jordan, PA) and the big Quartet, but routine and redevelopment are BORING to war reporters
Bringing calm and order to Gaza is a very good thing, of course, but HOW it is done matters rather a lot. If the calm and order exist mainly because all Sunnis (Fatah) are gone, some through slaughter, that doesn't exactly put a shine on Hamas' ability to nurture a healthy society. Order and calm are not always as blissful as they seem.

You mentioned nothing about how the Sunnis (Fatah supporters) are faring in Gaza these days, either. Are there any at all hanging around, able to move freely wherever their business takes them? I tend to doubt it. If all the people milling around you, and being peaceful, calm and orderly are Shi'ites (Hamas supporters), then it's no big accomplishment on Hamas' part, is it?

The Nazis brought order to Germany, too. That doesn't mean everybody was happily spitting nickels.

Hamas now depends on Israel allowing food to be sent into Gaza. Nice, isn't it? Israel is supposed to provide food to people who have gone intractably on record as wanting to see Israel utterly destroyed and every Jew slaughtered.

Yet Israel is required to have compassion for people who would give them none.

If they give them food, will they release Shalit and Johnston? If that criminal family allegedly holding them are afraid of reprisals from Hamas if they let them go, one has to ask why they put themselves thus in jeopardy by taking them in the first place? Even without the coups by Hamas, they'd have been in danger from Hamas for what they did. Methinks I smell a big can of worms there, don't you? Have you asked these people any pointed questions? Or are they too intimidating? If so, say so. After you get back, of course. Is it possible you're praising Hamas in order to get Mr. Johnston free again? It's not likely to work. They'll take the praise, of course, but those two captives are not likely to see any improvements in their lives for quite some time - maybe never.

Abbas isn't much better. He wants the West to help him, give him lots of money so he can retake Gaza, and then rejoin Hamas in that "coalition" government which could never consider any kind of accords with Israel - and then he'll want to continue as the corrupt politician he always was. Supporting him isn't going to result in implementation of the "road map." I imagine nothing can. The hate over there is too towering.

It might actually be best if the Palestinians split into two "nations," Gaza and the West Bank, with all the Sunnis in one and the Shi'ites in the other. Less sectarian slaughter, and there'd be order and peace in both "valleys." Then let them compete to convince the outside world which of the sects is inherently more civilized than the other.

It'd be a major undertaking to move large numbers of people, but it'd be worth it in the long run. Then Israel can deal with each, according to its lights (or "darks", if you will).

Holly B.
This article poses some very difficult truths: the US and the west in general are making a massive blunder in this conflict by backing a discredited, corrupt clique against a popular movement--you don't have to like hamas to understand its sources of strength.
Some of the above comments reflect, alas, the stident ignorance that now passes for discourse in the west. Almost all Palestinians are Sunni. Hamas are Sunni. Fatah Sunni (with some Christians). Ben's posting accurately reflects the cautious relief among Gazans that the fighting is over, and worries that thngs could, after a respite, become much worse. Anyone who wants to belittle Hamas or downplay what has happened is either engaging in self-deception or wishful thinking. I think this is an excellent article, if you can see byond your biases and preconceptions.
This is a brilliant article, and I think Ben Wedeman, CNN's most experienced Middle East correspondent, clearly has a better idea of reality in Gaza than the couch commentators who have posted their ignorance here. The US needs to understand what is going on the Middle East, not bash its head uselessly against the wall with frustration because the region doesn't fit its narrow concepts of how things should be as opposed to how they really are. Paris Hilton and other pointless stories are not where serious news organisations should be focusing their resources. The Middle East is falling apart, and the American giant is busy watching bimbos who have been arrested for drunk driving. More power to you Ben. You represent all that CNN should be, not what it has become.
Great Piece!
I don't agree with those who say this is a PR piece for Hamas or antyone. It's a good on the ground piece, with lots of atmosphere and some very good analysis.
Bravo Ben. A masterful piece of insight! My only complaint is...give us more!
Incisive insight, and much lacking from other sources. Thank you, Mr Wedeman. More, please, more!

Not a word about the fact that it is Hamas who threatens the very existence of Israel day in and day out. Not a word that it is Isarel who is provising electricity and food (yes, daily deliveries) to those who want to kill all Israelis. Not a word about Shalit, only about your friend from Britain. It is the same Hamas whci you credit with bringing order to Gaza (soon they will build Autobahns?), who make new demands for his release day in and day out.
There are two sides to each cin, Ben, but in this piece you give only one!!HE
I don't see any news about Thailand even when there is huge coup in Thailand and the people are trying to fight back for their country. Why is there no news about Thailand?
Hear from CNN reporters across the globe. "In the Field" is a unique blog that will let you share the thoughts and observations of CNN's award-winning international journalists from their far-flung bureaus or on assignment. Whether it's from conflict zone, a summit gathering, or the path least traveled, "In the Field" gives you a personal, front row seat to CNN's global newsgathering team.
    What's this?
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.