ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
   africa
   americas
   asianow
   europe
   middle east
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:

 

World - Americas

Cuba disputes U.S. claim that nuclear plant is unsafe

plant
Valuable power source or potential Chernobyl? The answer depends on who you ask.
RELATED VIDEO
CNN's Lucia Newman takes a look at the controversial nuclear project
Windows Media 28K 80K
 

May 18, 1999
Web posted at: 9:15 p.m. EDT (0115 GMT)

HAVANA (CNN) -- Cuban officials insist a planned nuclear power plant in Cuba would meet international safety standards and reject U.S. criticism that the facility is deteriorating and could trigger an environmental disaster.

"We don't comment on the nuclear power plants that the United States has in its territory," said Cuban Vice President Carlos Lage.

The Juragua power station, begun by the Cuban and Soviet governments in the early 1980s, was abandoned when it ran out of money after the Soviet Union collapsed.

However, Russia's Interfax news agency reported last week that Russia and Cuba reached agreement on a new joint venture to complete the plant, located on Cuba's southern coast.

U.S. officials have expressed skepticism that the Russians and Cubans can find the estimated $700 million needed to finish the project.

The plant is based on Soviet technology, but would use a light-water reactor, rather than the graphite-cooled model built in Chernobyl, Ukraine, the site of the world's worst nuclear accident.

Some U.S. critics fear the plant's construction is not safe, accusing the Cubans of constructing a facility riddled with cracks in concrete containment vessels and substandard welds in critical pipes. They fear an accident could threaten the United States.

map
In the event of an accident, nuclear fallout could travel up the east coast to the U.S. capital and as far west as Texas, according to the NOAA  

According to data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association, radiation leaks from the Cuban plant could be carried by Caribbean winds north to Florida and up the eastern seaboard to Washington, D.C., or possibly west to Texas.

"We certainly don't need another Chernobyl 90 miles away from the United States," said New Jersey congressman Bob Menendez, who suggested the United States respond by reducing U.S. aid to Russia by the same amount Russia invests in the plant.

Cuba said the nuclear plant will meet international requirements and said the government was willing to work with an International Atomic Energy body.

"We have not rejected this. We have excellent relations with those organizations. We've always worked with them, and not because anyone asks us to," Lage said.

Havana Bureau Chief Lucia Newman contributed to this report.



RELATED STORIES:
Russia, Cuba seek investors to finish Cuban nuclear plant
May 14, 1999
Controversy surrounds warning system for Cuban nuclear plant
March 19, 1999

RELATED SITES:
Natural Resources Defense Council
  •  The Juragua Nuclear Plant
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Cubaweb
International Atomic Energy Agency
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.