U.S. port ban for Japanese ships delayed until Saturday
Lawyer: Japanese shippers have no plans to pay fine
October 17, 1997
Web posted at: 1:14 p.m. EDT (1714 GMT)
In this story:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Negotiations to head off a ban of
Japanese cargo vessels in U.S. ports resumed Friday, and
Washington said any action would be delayed until Saturday.
The sanction -- to be imposed because of unpaid fines --
originally was to take effect Friday afternoon.
An attorney for Japan's three largest shipping lines said
Friday that the companies had no plans to pay $4 million in
fines to avert a showdown, despite some reports to the
contrary.
A ban would affect billions of dollars in products hauled
back and forth between the world's two biggest economies.
Japan called the port ban decision illegal but said it would
monitor developments before deciding whether to retaliate.
President Clinton has the authority to prevent the port ban
on national security grounds. But administration officials
said they don't think he'll do that.
The U.S. Maritime Commission said Thursday it would take the
action because the three shipping companies failed to meet a
deadline for paying fines it had imposed. The commission is
an independent federal agency that enforces shipping
regulations at U.S. ports.
It voted to direct the Coast Guard to keep Japanese ships out
of U.S. ports, and to direct the U.S. Customs Service to
detain Japanese ships already in those ports.
The sanction would be imposed in retaliation for what U.S.
officials see as restrictive practices against U.S. shippers
in Japanese ports.
Tokyo sources had told CNN that Japan probably would pay the
fines, because it would be cheaper than the cost of rerouting
shipments and delaying deliveries. However, an attorney for
the shipping lines later denied that.
"We have no intention of paying the fines at this time," Ken
Quinn told CNN. "We are hoping cooler heads will prevail and
the situation will be settled."
The United States argues that Japanese ports discriminate
against non-Japanese ships and push up costs. The complaint
is that Japan requires all shippers to receive prior approval
for even the most minor operational changes in handling cargo
at its ports.
U.S. negotiators were demanding that these restrictions be
lifted, so American shippers would have the same privileges
at Japanese ports that Japanese lines enjoy in the United
States.
The Japanese government says the dispute is a private-sector
matter, but admits that its port practices are in need of
reform and that domestic shippers and exporters are unhappy
with the current setup.
The shipping firms argue that the commission's quarrel is not
with them but with the Japan Harbor Transport Association,
which controls cargo handling.
The port operations are widely thought to be influenced by
"yakuza" gangsters.
Japanese Transport Minister Takao Fujii denied that the
ministry had failed to take stronger action due to fear of
the yakuza. "We are not afraid, and there aren't such
elements," he said.
In Washington, negotiators from both sides of the trade
dispute met late into Thursday night at the Transportation
Department and resumed talks Friday morning.
"The decision is deplorable and regrettable, coming when we
are making last-minute efforts to resolve the dispute,"
Fujii told a Tokyo news conference on Friday. "The U.S.
sanctions were illegal and I urged Washington to withdraw
them."
The three companies -- Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Kawasaki
Kisen Kaisha Ltd. and Nippon Yusen K.K. -- typically carry
containers of boxes that can be loaded onto railroad cars.
Their cargo excludes automobiles, grain or steel which
usually are shipped in bulk.
Oil tankers also would not be affected by the port ban.
Tokyo Bureau Chief John Lewis and Reuters contributed to this report.