Mad dogs and Englishmen: Brits question pet quarantine
October 18, 1996
Web posted at:11:45 p.m.(0345GMT)
From Correspondent Margaret Lowrie
LONDON (CNN) -- Britain may be a nation of dog lovers, but it
has a tradition of treating animals entering the country very
Immigrant animals automatically face six months behind bars
in Britain, quarantined in special kennels to ensure they do
not have rabies.
Critics say the procedure is antiquated, expensive and
"The quarantine system that now pertains, though it has
served a very useful purpose for a large number of years, is
no longer appropriate," said Lord Ernst Soulsby of Vets in
Support of Change.
"Almost every other country in the world that is free of
rabies, such as Australia and New Zealand, do allow dogs in,
appropriately vaccinated (and) appropriately identified."
Passports for Pets is veteran traveler Lady Mary Fretwell's
answer to British quarantine. She wants to allow the owners
of vaccinated animals to certify their pets' good health with
traditional paper passports and microchips implanted in the
"What's the point of subjecting these animals -- 10,000 a
year -- into these sort of conditions when a blood test,
vaccine and positive identification would reassure
everybody?" Fretwell said.
Others say the risk is still too great. "The reliability of
pet passports and the vaccinations, while high, is not high
enough, and it doesn't offer the certainty of the present
system," said British Parliament member David Shaw.
Law is working
Britain's rabies law was introduced in 1901. Some say it may
be brutal, but it works: the nation has been rabies-free
for more than 25 years.
"Quarantine has been very effective, and therefore we will
not change unless we can ensure that the new regulations are
equally effective," said Tony Stevens of the British
It is not just the mandatory quarantine under scrutiny, but
the way it is carried out. Critics say the $3,000 to $5,000
owners must pay to kennel animals is too steep.
"The consumer who is paying a lot of money has no rights on
this," said Fretwell. "They have no rights to bring in their
individual vet; they have to use the quarantine kennel's
Some say a pet passport system would cost the government too
much -- more veterinary customs staff, more equipment -- to
handle more animals moving in and out of the country.
But then it could cut down on pet smuggling, which ultimately
could prove a greater health threat to the country.
Related sites: Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites a