ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
* U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 SPACE
 HEALTH
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 ARTS & STYLE
 NATURE
 IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 myCNN

 Headline News brief
 news quiz
 daily almanac

  MULTIMEDIA:
 video
 video archive
 audio
 multimedia showcase
 more services

  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:

US

Expanding HMO patients' lawsuit rights sparks debate

graphic

Would result be higher premiums or better managed care?

October 8, 1999
Web posted at: 8:26 p.m. EDT (0026 GMT)


In this story:

Punitive damages at issue

States move ahead on own

RELATED STORIES, SITES icon



From Senior Washington Correspondent Charles Bierbauer

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The patients' bill of rights passed by the House this week still has a number of hurdles to clear before becoming law -- not least of which will be a continuing lively debate over whether the rights of patients to sue their managed health plans should be expanded.

No, say health plans and insurers, who see the provision as a sop to trial lawyers that will drive up the cost of coverage.

"Clearly, it will increase the cost to consumers, and it will lead to more uninsurance because, as costs go up, employers are going to say, 'Can I afford this?'" says Charles Kahn of the Health Insurance Association of America.

But on the other side, trial lawyers, doctors and consumer advocates point out that health plans can avoid the costs of lawsuits by treating people fairly.

"Litigation costs will never need to increase premiums as long as HMOs provide the kind of care they are supposed to provide," says trial lawyer Sharon Arkin. "They won't be sued."

Punitive damages at issue

HMOs can already be sued by patients -- but only in federal court and only to recover the cost of denied treatment. Punitive damages cannot be sought.

The bill passed by the House would change that, allowing potentially larger damage suits. However, a separate version passed by the Senate does not allow punitive damages. Both the House and Senate versions require an independent review of decisions to deny coverage before a patient may sue.

Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office calculated that a so-called "right-to-sue" provision would add 1.4 percent to insurance costs over five years, about 10 cents per month on an average policy.

States move ahead on own

Some states are not waiting for Congress to act. California and Texas, for instance, have expanded the rights of patients to sue HMOs. And supporters of the federal right-to-sue provision point out that there have been only five suits in two years.

"When the doctors request the case for their patients, they are getting approvals now, instead of denials," Arkin says.

The Senate and House will now have to work out differences between their versions of the patients' bill of rights. The measure will also have to be approved by President Clinton, who supports expanded lawsuit rights.



RELATED STORIES:
Health care returns as an issue
October 4, 1999

RELATED SITES:
Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA)
Congressional Budget Office Home Page
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.