ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
* U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 SPACE
 HEALTH
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 ARTS & STYLE
 NATURE
 IN-DEPTH
 ANALYSIS
 myCNN

 Headline News brief
 news quiz
 daily almanac

  MULTIMEDIA:
 video
 video archive
 audio
 multimedia showcase
 more services

  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:

US

Japanese radiation leak puts spotlight on U.S. nuclear safety

radition warning sign
Thursday's radiation leak in Japan is an eerie reminder that the U.S. is not immune to nuclear accidents  

October 1, 1999
Web posted at: 9:58 p.m. EDT (0158 GMT)


In this story:

Toxic brew problem at Hanford

Accident being studied at Los Alamos

RELATED STORIES, SITES icon



(CNN) -- Thursday's accident at a nuclear processing plant in Japan has turned the spotlight on the safety of nuclear facilities in the United States.

Among those facilities is a Westinghouse plant near Columbia, South Carolina, that produces nuclear fuel for 47 nuclear reactors in the United States and overseas. Though there have been no significant accidents or radiation releases in the plant's 30-year history, the man who oversees operations there says that's no reason for complacency.

  INTERACTIVE
A timeline of some of the World's Nuclear Accidents
 

"We're not walking away in any fashion, believing that it could not happen here," said plant manager Jack Allen. "What we are saying is that we design and operate ... and we regulate ourselves openly so that we can prevent such an occurrence."

The Columbia plant, like others in the United States, uses only 5 percent enriched uranium. The Japanese plant, officials believe, used almost 19 percent enriched uranium, which can be problematic.

Allen says a well-run plant with an experienced staff -- and alert control room operator -- is the best defense against accidents. At the Columbia plant, workers average 20 years on the job.

Toxic brew problem at Hanford

Hanford
At the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state, 54 million gallons of toxic and radioactive waste is stored in 177 tanks  

At the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state, officials are in the process of dealing with a potential problem generated by 50 years of weapons production.

A witch's brew of 54 million gallons of toxic and radioactive waste is stored in 177 tanks. In one of those tanks, an accidental over-concentration of waste several years ago allowed a crust to form on top, which thickened to eight feet and allowed explosive hydrogen gas to build beneath it.

Officials at the plant used a mechanical arm to stir part of the crust, allowing some of the hydrogen to escape. Within a month, workers expect to begin pumping some of the dangerous liquid from the tank.

Two years ago, one of the waste tanks exploded, but no radioactive materials were released.

Despite the problems, officials at Hanford claim there is no risk that nuclear waste in any of these tanks will accidentally trigger a sustained nuclear chain reaction such as the one that occurred in Tokaimura, Japan.

"There's no way we can have a criticality in those tanks, and that's been sanctioned by a lot of the experts who've examined our work," said Jackson Kinzer of the Department of Energy, which runs the Hanford site.

Still, concern that practices at Hanford's plutonium finishing plant could trigger a chain reaction led to a two- year suspension of the process until this year, when procedures were changed.

Many who live around Hanford view the possibility of a nuclear accident in much the same way as people in California view earthquake risks.

"I think it's in the back of their minds. We all think about it," says John Schmidt, a state air quality inspector who says that, nonetheless, he's confident those who run Hanford can keep it safe.

Accident being studied at Los Alamos

At the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, the Japanese accident is getting a lot of attention.

Nuclear response teams are studying the so-called "criticality" accident to determine if any procedures need to be changed. While Los Alamos does not process uranium like the Japanese facility, scientists do handle radioactive materials in their research to make nuclear weapons more reliable.

U.S. experts suspect Japanese uranium workers improperly combined nuclear materials, setting off a self-sustaining chain reaction. But officials at Los Alamos say safety precautions make such an accident at their plant unlikely.

"We have sufficient engineering design controls and procedural controls to prevent an accidental criticality from happening in our facilities," said laboratory spokeswoman Evelyn Mullen.

There have been three "criticality" incidents at Los Alamos in the 56 years the plant has been in operation. However, all three were small-scale, and the last was back in 1958.

Many Los Alamos residents say they have confidence in the safety procedures.

"I'm not too worried about it. I mean, if it happens, I don't have any control," said Rainy Kim, a Los Alamos resident. "It's out of my hands."

Correspondents Charles Zewe, Brian Cabell and Don Knapp contributed to this report.



RELATED STORIES:
Japan takes stock after Tokaimura nuclear accident
October 1, 1999
Defunct reactor on way to Washington state burial
August 9, 1999
Radioactive reactor taking risky journey past Portland
August 7, 1999
Security training ordered by Energy Department
July 29, 1999
Bill seeks protection for Hanford Reach
March 26, 1999

RELATED SITES:
U.S. Department of Energy - Hanford Home Page
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Department of Consumer and Business Services - Oregon Office of Energy Web Site
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.