
Court upholds federal death penalty law
June 21, 1999
Web posted at: 2:21 p.m. EDT (1821 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court on Monday narrowly
upheld the sentence of the first person condemned to die
under a 1994 federal death penalty law.
The justices ruled that jury instructions in a federal death
penalty case do not have to spell out in advance the
consequences of a deadlock on sentencing.
By a 5-4 vote, the high court ruled the death sentence was
valid for Louis Jones. He was convicted for the 1995 murder
of Tracie Joy McBride, a 19-year-old Army private stationed
in San Angelo, Texas.
Jones, who had retired from the Army in 1993 after a 22-year
career, confessed to abducting McBride and taking her to his
home in San Angelo. The case became a federal matter because
McBride was abducted from a military base laundry room.
He told authorities he later took her to an isolated area
about 20 miles from the city and beat her to death with a
tire iron. Jones led authorities to her body.
A federal jury in Texas convicted Jones of murder, and
sentenced him to death. A U.S. appeals court upheld both the
conviction and sentence under the Federal Death Penalty Act
of 1994.
Justice Clarence Thomas said in the court's majority opinion
that the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment
does not require that the jury be instructed about the
consequences of their failure to agree on a death sentence.
In other action Monday, the Supreme Court:
- Agreed to decide whether a federal law intended to shield
children from sex-oriented cable TV networks violates the
free-speech rights of channels such as Playboy TV. The
justices said they will review the case during the next term
in the autumn.
- Allowed prosecutors to continue offering leniency for
testimony of cooperating witnesses. The high court rejected
without comment or dissent the argument that federal
prosecutors commit bribery by granting leniency to witnesses
in exchange for testimony.
- Determined that limits set in the Prison Litigation Reform
Act for attorney-fee awards to inmates suing over prison
conditions apply only to legal work performed after it took
effect in 1996.
- Said police generally do not need a warrant to search a car
they have reason to believe is carrying illegal drugs. The
court ruled that a search warrant is not required even if
police had plenty of time to get one after receiving a tip
that a car might be carrying drugs.
- Temporarily stopped the dismantling of a special public
school district for disabled children in a New York community
of ultra-Orthodox Jews. The justices granted an emergency
request by state officials to postpone the effect of a ruling
by New York's highest court. The New York court had ruled
that the creation of the special district violated the U.S.
Constitution's separation of church and state.
- Agreed to use an Arizona drug case to decide whether some
criminal convictions must be overturned because of
jury-selection errors. The court will hear an appeal in which
prosecutors say a drug-trafficking conviction was valid even
though the judge failed to remove a potential juror who
showed signs of bias.
- Ruled that an Alabama county can collect an occupational
fee from two federal judges who work there. By a 7-2 vote,
the justices overturned a federal appeals court ruling that
had deemed the fee unconstitutional when applied to the two
judges.
Correspondent Charles Bierbauer, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.
RELATED STORIES:
Evidence withheld, but execution to proceed June 17, 1999
Supreme Court says anti-abortion activists must pay fines June 14, 1999
Supreme Court strikes down Chicago's anti-loitering law June 10, 1999
Supreme Court refuses to rule in school-harassment case June 1, 1999
Supreme Court OKs random drug tests in Indiana school district October 5, 1998
RELATED SITES:
Federal Judiciary Homepage
The Supreme Court Historical Society
Supreme Court Opinions
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
|