Settlement possible in Minnesota tobacco trial
May 5, 1998
Web posted at: 9:18 p.m. EDT (0118 GMT)
ST. PAUL, Minnesota (CNN) -- Barring a possible settlement,
jury instructions should begin Wednesday in the Minnesota
tobacco trial, followed by closing arguments. The case could
go to the jury on Friday, although both sides sought Tuesday
to get the judge, not jurors, to issue a verdict.
The two sides have discussed a settlement offer of more than
$5 billion, but other details, including attorney fees, have
held up a final agreement, CNN learned Tuesday.
A spokeswoman for Attorney General Hubert H. Humphrey III
said anticipating a possible settlement is "like waiting for
Godot," a reference to the man who never arrives to meet two
other men in the Samuel Beckett play.
Minnesota and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota are
seeking $1.77 billion from the tobacco industry for what they
say are costs related to treating smoking-related health
problems. They also seek punitive damages. The trial began
January 20.
Three other states -- Florida, Texas and Mississippi --
settled similar lawsuits before the cases went to trial.
Philip Morris' chief negotiator, Meyer Koplow, has been
participating in the Minnesota talks, a source said.
Meanwhile, attorneys on both sides filed motions Tuesday
contending that the other side had failed to prove its case,
and asking the judge to issue a directed verdict in their
favor.
A judge can direct a verdict if he feels the evidence is
overwhelming for one side. Ramsey County District Judge
Kenneth J. Fitzpatrick took no action on the motions. Motions for directed verdicts are common before a case goes to the jury.
Judge drops one company from lawsuit
Fitzpatrick ordered that British-American Tobacco U.K. &
Export Ltd. be dropped from the lawsuit, because the state
did not prove that it has jurisdiction over the company. The
jury heard little about the firm during 14 weeks of
testimony.
"It's a beginning," said British-American Tobacco attorney
David Bernick outside the courthouse. Bernick also is
representing Brown & Williamson Tobacco and its owner, B.A.T.
Industries PLC.
Documents show lawyers had ties to research
Also Tuesday, lawyers on both sides were allowed to enter
documents into evidence, and state attorneys said they
planned to enter 36 of them.
Many of them indicate that lawyers working for the tobacco
industry played key roles in determining what research was
done, what was made public, and whether documents detailing
the health dangers of cigarettes were destroyed, according to
attorney Michael Ciresi, lead attorney for the state.
The first batch of 39,000 documents posted on the Internet
last month by U.S. Rep. Tom Bliley, R-Virginia, were accepted
by the judge into evidence. But by late afternoon, because of
the sheer volume of text, neither the jurors nor reporters
covering the trial had studied them.
Though the documents were posted on the Internet, they have
been "hidden in plain sight," as one lawyer put it. That's
because it is a difficult, time-consuming process to download
and scan documents from the Internet.
A court order has kept state attorneys from making public any
of the documents, except those that are entered into
evidence. Since the tobacco industry has been presenting its
case for several weeks, the state has had few opportunities
to enter its newly obtained documents.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Special section:
Message board:
Related stories:
Related sites:
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
© 1998 Cable News Network, Inc.
A Time Warner Company
All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which
this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.