IRS overhaul cleared by Senate panel
|
|
The Senate Finance Committee approved a bill
overhauling the Internal Revenue Service Tuesday night
| |
Computer glitches may delay implementation
April 1, 1998
Web posted at: 9:31 a.m. EST (1431 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate Finance Committee has
unanimously approved legislation aimed at making the
Internal Revenue Service more "taxpayer friendly." But
problems with the agency's aging computers threaten to delay some
changes for several years.
By a 20-0 vote Tuesday evening, the panel endorsed making
far-reaching changes at the IRS and extending dozens of new
rights to taxpayers. A vote by the full Senate is expected in
late April after another round of hearings focusing on IRS
problems.
|
|
Roth
| |
The bill is the Senate panel's first attempt at reforming the
IRS since its well-publicized hearings last fall. The House
passed its own version of IRS reform in November.
"I think it's a major step forward for the American
taxpayer," said Senate Finance Chairman William Roth,
R-Delaware, the bill's main sponsor.
Highlights of the bill:
- Shifts the burden of proof.
The IRS -- not the taxpayer -- would be required to prove its
case once a tax dispute goes to court. Critics, including IRS
commissioners, say this reduces incentives to keep records
and would make the IRS even more aggressive.
"It will make tax controversies more expensive, more
intrusive and more inconvenient for taxpayers," argued Sen.
Kent Conrad, D-North Dakota.
However, Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, argued the burden of proof
item directly responded to the stories of taxpayer abuse the
panel heard in dramatic hearings last fall.
"Shifting the burden of proof will change the way the IRS
does business," Gramm said.
- Creation of an oversight board.
The Roth bill would create a new oversight board whose
members would include executives from the private sector. The
board would have power over law enforcement and collection
activities and would have limited authority to review
taxpayer records. The Senate agreed at the last minute to
include the Treasury secretary and a representative from the
IRS workers union on the board.
|
|
The Taxpayer Relief Act contains 285 new tax code
sections and 824 amendments
| |
Roth and other Republicans had argued that guaranteeing a
union seat on the board would give rise to potential
conflicts of interest, since the union's interests might be
at odds with taxpayers in general.
But Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, prevailed in his proposal
for a union seat on the panel, arguing that the National
Treasury Employees Union played a valuable role in a study
commission that gave rise to the IRS bill.
- Waives some penalties.
Currently, when taxpayers are audited, they're not only
responsible for paying outstanding, overlooked taxes, but
also owe penalties and interest on those taxes. For many
whose audits have dragged on, the penalties can be more than
the original taxes owed. The bill's plan would suspend
penalties if the IRS had not contacted the taxpayer within a
year of the due date of the taxpayer's return.
- Protects spouses.
This provision would ensure that the IRS would no longer hold
people responsible for the tax liability of their ex-spouses.
The bill ensures that each individual is responsible for only
his or her own income.
- Protection from property seizures.
The bill would implement safeguards for taxpayers from
property seizures and require an IRS employee to get two
signatures from their superiors before seizing any property.
The taxpayer would also have 30 days to challenge a seizure
before it occurs.
In the hearings last fall, one witness testified that the IRS
seized a check made out to him from the state of Delaware and
he had no recourse.
Cost still a problem
Critics say the one problem with the bill is cost.
The bill would cost $6.5 billion over the first five years,
but no provision was made for the second five-year period,
leaving a gap of $9.5 billion that would have to be paid for.
The committee turned down an attempt to raise tobacco taxes
by 10 cents a pack and speed up the first phase of a tobacco
tax increase in the 1997 tax bill to fully pay for the IRS
overhaul.
Roth apparently is planning some "offsets" to raise
the same amount somewhere else, but it is not clear exactly
where those offsets would come from.
IRS Commissioner Charles Rossotti appealed to the committee
to delay the implementation of any reform until January 30,
2000, so changes don't interfere with their efforts to fix
computer problems related to the year 2000.
Furthermore, Rossotti said, IRS systems are unable to
accommodate the changes with the speed necessary to make the
proposal workable.
Roth said he would consider the plea but still pressed to
have taxpayer rights provisions implemented as soon as
possible.
"As far as I'm concerned, justice delayed is justice denied,"
Roth said. The committee agreed to prioritize the taxpayer
rights provisions and meet with the IRS to work out a
compromise.