Reno defends FBI's work in Nichols case
|
|
Terry Nichols
| |
Six jurors reportedly favored a death sentence
January 8, 1998
Web posted at: 8:58 p.m. EST (0158 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Attorney General Janet Reno on Thursday
strongly defended the government's investigation and
prosecution of Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry
Nichols, rejecting suggestions by the forewoman of his jury
that the FBI "dropped the ball" in its probe of the blast.
"I think the FBI did an excellent job," Reno said, speaking
at her weekly news conference. "In this instance, when you
look at what the FBI has done, I'm just very, very proud of
their work."
1.9M/22 sec. AIFF or WAV sound
On Wednesday, the jury that convicted Nichols of conspiracy
and involuntary manslaughter was dismissed, after jurors were
unable to unanimously agree on a death sentence. Their lack
of a decision means U.S. District Judge Richard Matsch will
sentence Nichols -- but under federal law, the judge does not
have the option of condemning him to death.
In a news conference Wednesday, Niki Deutchman, the jury's
forewoman, criticized the FBI's handling of the case, calling
it "sloppy" and chastising the agency for being "arrogant."
She also said the FBI should have pursued other possible
suspects in the 1995 blast in Oklahoma City, which killed 168
people and wounded more than 500.
But Reno said she thought, "the investigation has been as
complete as possible. I think we have identified the people
[responsible]."
"One of the things that I have learned is that when you have
a long and complicated case, there may be different feelings
from jurors who may not be aware of all the circumstances
that go into an investigation," the attorney general said.
Six jurors reportedly wanted death sentence
|
|
Chris Seib
| |
More of the Nichols jurors have commented on the case, adding
to Deutchman's depiction of a sharply divided jury.
According to one juror, six of the 12 jurors wanted the death
penalty for Nichols. Four wanted a sentence of life without
parole. Two wanted to leave the sentencing to Matsch.
"I wanted the death penalty," said juror Chris Seib. "I think
we owed it to those victims. We owed it to their families."
"It was a very tough case. We worked very hard," juror
Timothy Burge said. "We were fortunate to get the conspiracy
verdict. I want my prayers and thoughts to go to the people
in Oklahoma City."
Juror Chris Seib talks about the trial |
Crying 408K/18 sec. AIFF or WAV sound |
"...building a bomb." 357K/16 sec. AIFF or WAV sound |
Juror Ted Baker, who supported the death penalty, said he
wanted deliberations to continue beyond Wednesday morning,
when Matsch cut them off and dismissed the jury. Baker said
he believes the impasse might have been broken if jurors had
taken another look at the evidence.
But juror Holly Hanlin agreed with Deutchman's criticism that
the government failed to prove its case fully.
"We couldn't find enough evidence to convince at least all of
us that he intended, that he was involved from the very
beginning, that he built the bomb. We felt that evidence was
shaky at best," she said.
Unrecorded FBI interviews raised as issue
One of Deutchman's particular criticisms of the FBI was that
interviews with key witnesses, including a nine-hour
interview with Nichols, were not taped. Instead, agents
submitted their notes of the conversations to the jury.
Several witnesses during the trial disputed the FBI's
recollections of their interviews.
Defense attorney Ron Woods, a former FBI agent, had told the
jury that FBI agents are told not to record interviews
because it boils down in court to the word of the agent
against other witnesses.
The FBI responded that it doesn't record interviews because
it makes witnesses reluctant to talk.
But Mimi Wesson, a University of Colorado law professor and
former federal prosecutor, said many people find the FBI's
refusal to record interviews troubling.
Wesson said it's not unusual for people to change their
stories as their recollections evolve over time, but she said
recording interviews would make it easier for jurors to
determine why they changed.