CNN logo
navigation

Search


Pathfinder


Main banner
rule

Supreme Court to review religious freedom case

Scotus graphic

Justices reject Kevorkian appeal

October 15, 1996
Web posted at: 4:00 p.m. EDT

In this story:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court said Tuesday it would review a federal law protecting religion from government interference. In a separate case involving freedom of speech, justices sided with inmates denied sex magazines. The court also rejected an appeal by Jack Kevorkian involving his home-built "suicide machine."

At issue in the religious freedom case is a 1993 law requiring federal, state and local government to accommodate a religious practice unless the government can prove it has a compelling interest in regulating it. The regulation chosen must be the least restrictive means possible.

Church

The case arose after Boerne, Texas, denied an application from a Roman Catholic archbishop for a permit to expand a church because it was within the city's historic district. Citing a large increase in parishioners, the church said it would be unable to accomplish its mission and survive as a parish church unless it expanded.

The archbishop sued, claiming the denial of the construction permit violated the 1993 law. The city replied that the law was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court will listen to the city's challenge early next year and issue a decision before June.

Inmates and sex magazines

The sex magazine case involves two inmates who sued after officials at Virginia's Keen Mountain Correctional Center told them in 1992 they no longer could receive certain issues of Gallery, a monthly magazine with erotic articles and pictures of nude women.

Prison officials said they based their decision on some of the written content in the magazine, not the nude photographs.

A federal judge upheld the state policy, but an appeals court said denying inmates access to the magazine violated the publisher's First Amendment rights. The state took the case to the Supreme Court, but justices Tuesday let stand the appeals court ruling.

Kevorkian

Kevorkian, who has publicly acknowledged attending more than 40 deaths since 1990, had asked the Supreme Court to reverse a 1991 injunction barring him from using his "suicide machine" on terminally ill patients.

But the justices, without comment or dissent, let stand a Michigan Supreme Court ruling in April that upheld the injunction. In a related case last year, the Supreme Court turned down Kevorkian's appeal of a Michigan Supreme Court decision that said there is no constitutional right to assisted suicide.

Correspondent Anthony Collings and Reuters contributed to this report.

rule

Related stories:

Related sites:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window

External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

rule
What You Think Tell us what you think!

You said it...
rule
To the top

© 1996 Cable News Network, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.