|
An expanded Web version of segments seen on CNN
|
|
|
Simmering threats remain in vault of Cold War history
|
|
Nuclear weapons remain scattered throughout the former Soviet Union
| |
April 16, 1998
Web posted at: 10:08 a.m. EDT (1408 GMT)
From Correspondent Rick Lockridge
ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico (CNN) -- The Cold War may be over,
but many experts agree the world is still not safe from
weapons of mass destruction.
In fact, in the hands of terrorists or rogue nations,
nuclear, biological and chemical weapons could be more
dangerous than ever. World arms control experts recently
gathered in New Mexico to look for ways to lessen the threat.
Nuclear devices scattered and poorly monitored throughout the
former Soviet Union are just one type of Cold War leftover
that has world leaders concerned.
And the risk that some of these weapons will be stolen or
sold only grows with time, according to Sen. Pete Domenici, R-New Mexico.
(91K/7 sec. AIFF or WAV sound)
Yet loose nukes were just one of many issues discussed at the
International Arms Control Summit in Albuquerque. During the
weekend conference, representatives from 32 countries and 250
experts dissected innumerable problems of modern terrorist
warfare.
Today, technological solutions are helping countries keep
track of their most destructive weapons.
The United States is testing sensors designed to monitor
sites half a world away, and catch intruders on tape. A
satellite-based system that can detect large explosions is
also being tested.
|
|
The International Arms Control Summit in Albuquerque
| |
John Holum, of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency,
said technology can be a friend of arms control.
(107K/10 sec. AIFF or WAV sound)
But no technology or strategy has been found that can protect
against threats like the 1995 chemical attack on a subway in
Japan.
Richard Falkenrath of Harvard University said there are new
terrorist groups emerging whose only aim is to cause massive
destruction.
(73K/6 sec. AIFF or WAV sound)
Experts call it the NBC threat -- nuclear, biological,
chemical. They say a single successful attack could be
devastating, but they fear preparation will be inadequate
until there's a crisis.
Falkenrath said there's a real risk the United States won't
move aggressively to reduce its vulnerability to weapons of
mass destruction until such an attack occurs on U.S. soil.
The message from Albuquerque seemed to be: Prepare now or
suffer the consequences later.