ad info
   personal technology

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

CNN Websites
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines

 message boards





Opinion: Microsoft ruling 'left me queasy'


November 12, 1999
Web posted at: 10:02 a.m. EST (1502 GMT)

by David Moschella

(IDG) -- Now that Judge Jackson has told us what he thinks about Microsoft, how do you feel? Are you happy that "the truth" has finally been officially recognized, or are you angry that one of the greatest companies in American history is being publicly pummeled and dragged through the mud, apparently because it is simply too successful? More likely, your feelings are, like mine, considerably more mixed.

I'm actually surprised that I feel almost no sense of vindication. After all, since the summer of 1996, I've been regularly writing that, regrettably and unwisely, Microsoft stepped over the line to become a dangerous new predator at large, the insatiable Tyrannosaurus Gates. I must have reiterated at least a dozen times that, because of its long-standing monopoly position, Microsoft's unrestrained use of predatory pricing, exclusionary contracts and discriminatory terms and conditions were clear violations of U.S. antitrust law. Jackson's impressively detailed analysis seemingly proved this once and for all.

VideoCNN's Rick Lockridge reports on the implications of the ruling that Microsoft is considered a monopoly.
Real 28K 80K
Windows Media 28K 80K

VideoCNN's Rick Lockridge looks at some of the history of the Microsoft antitrust trial
Real 28K 80K
Windows Media 28K 80K
  • Full report: U.S. v Microsoft, Findings of Fact
    Opinion: Microsoft ruling 'left me queasy'

    European users react calmly to findings in Microsoft case

    Microsoft case reaction

    Myths of the antitrust case

    Microsoft's dominance daunting, judge finds

    EU investigating Microsoft on antitrust charges

    Silicon Valley reacts to Microsoft 'monopoly'

    Special Report: Microsoft on Trial


    Nevertheless, the harshness of the judge's opinion left me with a distinctly queasy feeling, the sort of unease you get when you know that something isn't right. Remarkably, despite Microsoft's many improper acts, I can't help but feel that it has been treated unfairly. For example, Jackson had to work very hard to show that consumers have been harmed by Microsoft's behavior, but he all but ignored Microsoft's many obvious contributions. Similarly, while the judge recounted many of the things that Microsoft has done to harass and harm its competitors, he virtually never mentioned the even greater damage these companies have often inflicted upon themselves.

    The result is an unnecessarily unbalanced and overly harsh view that has left Microsoft highly exposed to all sorts of future litigation. We live in a country where even a respected but struggling company like Toshiba can be shaken down for $2 billion because some of its laptops had a theoretically faulty floppy drive that might have corrupted some users' data. Worse still, as the tobacco and gun industries have demonstrated, once the federal government has formally demonized a wealthy company or industry, it's pretty much open season for the lawyers. Microsoft would be wise to settle this case before these findings of fact become entrenched as findings of law.

    But don't get me wrong. Both the courts and the Department of Justice have undoubtedly performed a valuable service. Almost regardless of whatever settlement or remedy might eventually emerge, Microsoft has already softened its competitive behavior to the great benefit of competitors such as RealNetworks, Red Hat, Gateway, 3Com and others. More fundamentally, Microsoft really has only itself to blame for not recognizing, despite repeated warnings, that the government was serious in its concerns. With a little bit of wisdom, humility and respect, this horrible situation could easily have been avoided.

    From this perspective, Jackson's harshness might prove a blessing if it helps Microsoft to finally understand what so many of us have been saying all along. No one wants to take away Microsoft's right to innovate, and as long as Microsoft makes this the center of its defense, it may as well argue with itself. This case isn't about innovation; it's about behavior. And it happens to be the law of the land that monopolists have to play by different rules than other companies. It's a real shame that it is taking Microsoft so long to accept such an obvious and not particularly threatening reality.

    CNNfn: Special Report: Justice vs Microsoft

    Microsoft, Gates saw low points as stock price climbed
    November 5, 1999
    The marketplace has changed, but will Microsoft?
    November 5, 1999
    Video: Microsoft and Justice Department News Conferences
    November 5, 1999
    What if Microsoft loses the antitrust case?
    February 19, 1999
    Opinion: Microsoft trial resembles TV courtroom drama
    January 25, 1999
    Group seeks refunds for bundled versions of Windows
    January 22, 1999
    CNNfn: Day 3 in Microsoft trial
    October 21, 1998
    Microsoft lawyer turns up pressure on Netscape chief
    October 21, 1998
    Microsoft competitors: Living in fear
    October 20, 1998
    Small company finds comfortable co-existence with Microsoft
    October 20, 1998
    CNNfn: Microsoft, DOJ timeline
    October 16, 1998
    Microsoft hit with Windows-related class-action lawsuit
    June 26, 1998
    Antitrust case stirs feelings for & against Microsoft
    October 19, 1998

    Legal scholars say Microsoft faces "deep trouble"
    Europe investigates Microsoft
    (Network World Fusion)
    Myths of the antitrust case
    (PC World) sues Microsoft over patent
    Microsoft vs. DoJ daily coverage
    (The Industry Standard)
    Microsoft under fire roundup
    Microsoft story archive
    A customer view of browser integration
    (PC World)
    Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
    External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

    Judge Jackson's Findings of Fact
    Microsoft Corp.
    U.S. Department of Justice
    Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
    External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
    Enter keyword(s)   go    help

    Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines.