ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

From...
Industry Standard

Will Internet voting be good news for American democracy?

October 28, 1999
Web posted at: 10:58 a.m. EDT (1458 GMT)

by Jacob Weisberg

(IDG) -- The chief argument for e-voting is that it will cause more people to vote. As everyone knows, turnout has been declining. In presidential elections, it has fallen from 63 percent of the voting-age population in 1960 to less than 50 percent in 1996. There are many reasons for this, but one of them is surely the inconvenience of casting ballots in person. Before you can vote, you need to have registered, often several weeks before an election. Then you must go somewhere and stand in a line on a day that seems scientifically chosen to maximize the odds of lousy weather. If you're going to be away from home on Election Day, you have to think ahead about getting an absentee ballot. E-voting would eliminate these hassles. Some advocates believe that it would have its greatest impact on participation by voters aged 18 to 24, who turn out in lower numbers than any other group.

On the other side are a variety of objections. In addition to concerns about fraud, some argue that Internet voting would accentuate the socio-economic skew of our elections. Wealthier, whiter people are more likely to vote than poor people and minorities. Since they're also more likely to own personal computers, online voting might exaggerate the disparity. There is also an argument that the familiar process of voting in person serves a civic purpose. Rick Valelly, a professor at Swarthmore College, argued in the New Republic recently that real voting is a "vital public ritual that increases social solidarity and binds people together." You might call this the communitarian objection. Valelly thinks that e-voting would create "political anomie."

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
IDG.net   IDG.net home page
  Industry Standard home page
  Will a chip implanted into your body make it easier for you to vote?
  Five years from now, everyone will have Net appliances
  Track your local elections with live coverage from these news and politics sites
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Year 2000 World
  Industry Standard email newsletters
  Industry Standard daily Media Grok
  Industry Standard financial news
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for computer industry cognoscenti
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
 * Fusion audio primers
 * Computerworld Minute
   

I think it's fairly easy to answer the race-and-class argument. No one thinks that e-voting would replace r-voting any time soon. So long as it is an optional method, e-voting makes it easier for some people to vote especially the handicapped, people living abroad and frequent fliers without inconveniencing anyone else. This is what's called a win-win situation. Over the next decade, access to the Internet is forecast to become dirt cheap and quasi-ubiquitous. But for those who still can't afford or don't want private access at home, there will be public Internet terminals in libraries, schools and probably grocery stores and bus stations as well. E-voting might actually be a boon to the poor, who often can't miss work to vote as easily as higher-income types can.

The communitarian objection is a bit more troubling. Around the world, people struggle and die for the right to vote, just as people in this country once did. If you've ever seen the once-disenfranchised standing in line all day to cast the first ballot of a lifetime in South Africa or Guatemala, you will know that it's hard not to be appalled at how cavalierly people treat voting in this country. It's tempting to say that anyone unwilling to sacrifice an hour to exercise the right to vote doesn't much deserve it. Having to take a bit of trouble to vote reminds you that voting is the cornerstone of all our rights. By eliminating the ritual, e-voting stands to diminish the meaning attached to it.

I'd say that this complaint is valid but not persuasive. The chief value of the ritual of voting is to convey the significance of voting to democratic citizens. Once the ritual becomes a deterrent to the act itself, as it pretty clearly has, it ceases to serve its purpose. In the end, the communitarian objection to e-voting seems more aesthetic than substantive. On the Internet, more of us will exercise our right and fulfill our civic responsibilities. We just won't meet in a church basement to do it. The trade-off of higher participation for poorer visuals would seem one well worth making.

In fact, e-voting is less of a leap than it might seem. When you think about it, voting has long been a fusion of public and private, of tradition and technology. The secret ballot was a Progressive Era reform. Voting machines which utilize primitive, punch-card computer processing came into widespread use in the 1960s. These two innovations mean that we already vote privately by computer we just visit a public place to do so. It's not that nothing will be lost when we all vote from remote terminals instead of at the local polling place. But what we stand to lose is ephemeral. What we stand to gain from virtual voting is very real.


RELATED STORIES:
Virginia to conduct Internet-based mock election
October 25, 1999
Democracy Online project to find out exactly how Web affects elections
October 15, 1999
California, Washington ponder Internet voting
March 25, 1999
AllPolitics - An Online Voter Registration Form
April 12, 1996
U.S. on road to online voting
June 17, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Five years from now, everyone will have Net appliances
(PC World Online)
Will a chip implanted into your body make it easier for you to vote?
(Computerworld)
High-tech gas stations: check oil and e-mail at the pump
(InfoWorld)
AOL's Steve Case outlines four ways in which the Internet can improve society
(PC World Online)
Track your local elections with live coverage from these news and politics sites
(PC World Online)
Electronic voting could revolutionize group decision-making, boost voter participation, and bust the two-party lock on the U.S. political system
(PC World Online)
Digital Democracy Adds Up: Top Election Web Sites Offer Registration, Polling, Database Searching
(Civic.com)
Year 2000 World
(IDG.net)
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

RELATED SITES:
VoteHere.net
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.