ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

From...
Industry Standard

Laying down the law on domain names

August 25, 1999
Web posted at: 11:19 a.m. EDT (1519 GMT)

by David Pescovitz
domain names graphic
INTERACTIVE

Have you registered a domain name for personal or business use?

Yes No
View Results
 

(IDG) -- In the realm of intellectual-property law, domain names are still living in the Wild West. There is not yet a body of domain-name legal rulings to rely on if you feel you've been wronged, only the legal precedent from existing trademark law or relevant court cases. And the legal precedents are being set as we speak.

"Trademark law simply doesn't map onto the domain-name infrastructure," says Gray, Cary, Ware & Freidenrich attorney Mark Radcliffe, who has handled legal issues related to domain names for Salon.com, among many other companies. "You can have many people with the same trademark within any country as long as their products and services aren't confusingly similar. And competitors may own the same trademark in different countries."

For instance, Apple is a trademark that's owned by both the computer company and the Beatles' record label. But, Radcliffe points out, "there's only one dot-com address."

We asked Radcliffe to debunk some commonly held myths about domains and the law.

Myth: "My company registered the domain name first, so I have the right to it."

Reality: It depends on who obtained the trademark for those goods or services first. The best tactic is to simultaneously apply for a federal trademark and a corresponding domain. Trademark rights can be obtained simply by doing business with that name, although this only gives you rights in the geographic area in which you're using the name to conduct sales.

Myth: "I own the trademark, so I automatically have rights to the domain name."
MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
IDG.net   IDG.net home page
  Industry Standard home page
  Industry Standard email newsletters
  Industry Standard daily Media Grok
  Industry Standard financial news
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Year 2000 World
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for computer industry cognoscenti
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
 * Fusion audio primers
 * Computerworld Minute
   

Reality: If another party registered the domain before you got the trademark rights, you're probably out of luck. In addition, many other companies may also own the trademark, perhaps for other goods or services. Who gets the domain in those cases? That's up to the courts.

Myth: "Network Solutions will give me my domain name back once they realize I own the trademark."

Reality: If you send proof of trademark ownership to Network Solutions and written notice to the domain-name registrant, the most NSI will do, under its Domain Name Dispute Policy, is put the domain name "on hold," which prevents anyone from using it.

The real battle over the domain name will most likely be fought in court. Filing a lawsuit can run you $5,000 to $10,000 just to get it into court -- and let us not forget the hefty legal fees you'll face once the case goes before a judge (if it isn't settled out of court first, as the overwhelming majority of civil lawsuits are). Then there's the potential that you may have to pay penalties and the other company's legal fees if you lose.

Myth: "My domain name is only an electronic address, not a trademark, so I'm protected from companies that think they have legal rights to the domain name."

Reality: If you're using your site for commercial purposes, the company with the trademark probably has the law on its side.

Myth: "I'm using .net or .org, so I don't have to worry about violating someone's trademark."

Reality: Regardless of the suffix, rights are determined by the way in which you use the word or words.

Myth: "I'll be able to get the domain name I want in another country."

Reality: Possibly, but domain registries in many countries require that your firm be incorporated within that country's borders before you can gain rights to the domain name there. If you think things are complicated here, keep in mind that trademark law relating to domain names is even less clear abroad.


RELATED STORIES:
Opinion: E-nough already!
August 23, 1999
Books -- Book offers simple, low-cost advice on Web site creation
August 17, 1999
End of URLs as we know 'em?
August 10, 1999
ICANN downplays 'inappropriate' DOJ talks
August 3, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
The war for Drugs.com
(The Industry Standard)
Playing the name game
(The Industry Standard)
U.S. Bancorp sues over Internet domain
(Computerworld)
Senate says no to cybersquatters
(Network World Fusion)
Court tosses out Porsche domain-name suit
(Computerworld)
Talk.com isn't cheap
(The Industry Standard)
How to get the domain name you want
(PC World Online)
Domain-name speculators clog up the registration process
(Network World Fusion)
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

RELATED SITES:
Salon.com
Network Solutions Inc.
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.