ad info




CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

From...
Industry Standard

Is Cisco choking broadband pipes?

July 30, 1999
Web posted at: 12:13 p.m. EDT (1613 GMT)

privacy
INTERACTIVE

Which of these are more important?

No restrictions on broadband access Keeping objectionable sites away from the eyes of children
View Results
  

by Elizabeth Wasserman

WASHINGTON (IDG) -- As Cisco Systems helps build broadband Internet access through the nation's cable systems, the company isn't just dreaming about giving cable companies a way to speed access to certain Web sites and slow access to others.

They're bragging about it.

Marketing materials from Cisco Systems, one of the leading suppliers of Internet networking equipment for the cable industry, touts the company's ability to restrict or slow consumers from reaching the Web sites of their choice while speeding along those headed to others. Cisco's technology, the documents say, "could promote and offer your own or partners' services with full-speed features to encourage adoption of your services." At the same time, the material says the equipment can "restrict" incoming content and "subscribers' outgoing access" to "discourage its use."

The revelation came to light among documents presented to the Federal Communications Commission by several prominent consumer groups that seek to mandate open access to the nation's cable systems. The groups -- including the Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Media Access Project and the Center for Media Education -- are calling for regulations to open cable systems to competition from Internet service providers, or ISPs.
MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
IDG.net   IDG.net home page
  Industry Standard home page
  Industry Standard email newsletters
  Industry Standard daily Media Grok
  Industry Standard financial news
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Year 2000 World
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for computer industry cognoscenti
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
 * Fusion audio primers
 * Computerworld Minute
   

In response, Cisco issued a statement saying that the company "makes this technology available to everybody. This technology is consistent with Cisco's open-standard philosophy and commitment to competition in the marketplace. This technology was designed with customers in mind who clearly want tools to protect against offensive content, such as hate and obscene materials."

But giving such technology to the cable companies creates an uneasy situation whereby they could potentially control both access and content for their online subscribers. In the cable television industry now, companies do control both access and content via channels -- a paradigm the consumers group don't want to repeat with broadband Internet access.

"This is the owner's manual that they're providing to the cable industry to monopolize the Internet," Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Media Education, said in an interview. Chester said he found the Cisco marketing materials earlier this summer while strolling through the convention of the National Cable Television Association in Chicago.

The prospect of screening access comes amid a growing national debate about whether cable broadband networks should be opened to competitive Internet service providers. The cable industry, which is spending billions of dollars rolling out these services, has so far avoided regulation of its networks, which now reach about one million customers nationwide.

In the meantime, the issue has been taken up in some cities and counties across the nation, spurred on by the concerns of America Online and other ISPs, which complain that they won't be able to reach cable Internet customers. Only Portland, Ore., and Broward County, Fla., have so far called for regulation. Those rulings are being appealed by cable operators, with AT&T taking a lead role.

The FCC, which asserts that it has jurisdiction of the issue on a national basis, has been monitoring the debate but has so far taken a "hands-off" approach, with agency officials preferring to allow the market to determine what happens. "The FCC has the same goal as consumers and consumer groups," said FCC Cable Services Bureau Chief Deborah Lathen in a statement released Wednesday. "We want open access. Where we diverge is how to get there."

Lathen said that the Internet economy has generated over $300 billion in revenue in the United States in the past year because its development has been driven by market forces. "The FCC has played an important role by creating a deregulatory environment in which the Internet could prosper."

But in a letter presented Thursday to FCC Chairman William Kennard, the consumer groups charged that the failure to require open networks threatens the future of the Internet. The letter says that granting cable operators the right to exclude ISPs "would strip the Internet of the very qualities that have made it one of the most powerful vehicles for free expression and economic growth."

A spokesman for AT&T, Jim McGann, said he was unsure whether any company officials had seen the marketing materials or if the cable operations that AT&T is acquiring, including Tele-Communications Inc. and MediaOne Group, even use the Cisco products. He reiterated the company's position that it would not seek to control access to content on the Internet.

"AT&T has every incentive to make content available on the Internet to everyone," McGann said. "We have no incentive to restrict any content. For them to use this as another vehicle to say 'The sky is falling and we must do something' is a little far-fetched. The correct policy is what the commission has adopted. Keep regulation out of Internet."


RELATED STORIES:
High-speed-Net lobbyists claim 12 states are 'disconnected'
July 29, 1999
Internet heavies back new Net-policy group
July 13, 1999
Internet industry group to focus on 'consumer protection'
June 28, 1999
Big sites win support awards
July 20, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Opinion: Will cable modems succeed?
(Network World Fusion)
Cable-net services need work
(Network World Fusion)
FCC's Kennard: It's all about broadband
(The Industry Standard)
I'll take broadband for $200, Alex
(The Industry Standard)
Portland judge orders AT&T to open cable net
(Network World Fusion)
AT&T scores big in San Francisco
(The Industry Standard)
More trouble for AT&T cable plan
(Network World Fusion)
Year 2000 World
(IDG.net)
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

RELATED SITES:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Federal Communications Commission
AT&T
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.