advertising information

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

Intel lawsuit calls barring e-mail fair game

May 3, 1999
Web posted at: 2:15 p.m. EDT (1815 GMT)

by Cheri Paquet

From...
Network World Fusion
email graphic

(IDG) -- A ruling in an Intel lawsuit against a former employee may set a precedent that will let e-mail service providers ban certain types of messages.

Sacramento County Superior Court Judge John Lewis last week ruled that the lawsuit was a case of trespass and that the service provider Intel has the right to get a permanent injunction to keep out e-mail sent by Ken Hamidi.

Hamidi, a former Intel engineer fired in 1996, sent e-mail to 30,000 of Intel's employees on six separate occasions.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  Network World Fusion home page
  Free Network World Fusion newsletters
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
    IDG.net's bridges & routers page
  IDG.net's hubs & switches page
    IDG.net's network operating systems page
  IDG.net's network management software page
  Year 2000 World
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for network experts
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
  Fusion audio primers
  Computerworld Minute
   

Judge Lewis ruled that this e-mail was a trespass, without further explanation, said attorney Shari Steele, who is the director of legal services for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Judge Lewis left determining what e-mail is acceptable to the discretion of the service provider.

Steele hopes that Hamidi will appeal the courts decision. Hamidi has 13 more days in which to submit an appeal.

"At the very least, the appellate court can put severe limit on what it is that makes something a trespass," Steele said. However, she would prefer to have this lawsuit not classified as a trespass.

"Intel could have gone after Hamidi in other ways," she said. The company claimed that Hamidi used an old e-mail list to send mail and they could have sued him for stealing proprietary information.

According to Intel, Hamidi sent e-mail directly to Intel employees, using an internal e-mail address book.

Since Intel's e-mail addresses are not published outside the company, Judge Lewis found this to be an intrusion of private property, said Chuck Mulloy, an Intel spokesman.

Intel concedes that Hamidi has a right to express opinions, said Mulloy. Hamidi has disseminated his complaints against Intel's treatment of employees by distributing information on his Web site, FaceIntel.com, on college campuses and has staged public protests at Intel sites.

However, Hamidi's intrusion into Intel's e-mail system is the same thing as bringing a public demonstration inside the company, Mulloy said. "This is where his right to express himself conflicts with Intel's trespass rights."

Going forward Intel hopes Hamidi will comply with the permanent injunction and stop sending e-mail, Mulloy said.

This lawsuit could be a precedent-setting case in the event that Hamidi appeals the judge's permanent motion, Mulloy said.

Hamidi said that he does intend to appeal the court ruling. If necessary, he plans to take his appeals all the way to the California Supreme Court.

This case is the first of its kind and will effect every single American, Hamidi stated. "When some one tries to deliver a speech in a public forum, they (the government) will say 'Intel vs. Hamidi,' you cannot do that."

"Cases like mine educate people and I am determined to stand behind my beliefs," Hamidi said.

"Judge Lewis, who was not Internet savvy or literate enough to understand the difference between real space and cyberspace, said that I was trespassing on Intel's private property," Hamidi said.

E-mail was sent to an ISP mail server, which resides on the Internet and is a public domain, Hamidi said. "The company can not claim privacy on these public systems."

When Intel links their private intranet into the Internet, they are in public ground, Hamidi added. "I have never tried to access, hack or post to it (Intel's network) -- that is a fact."

Hamidi will continue to fight for his freedom of expression and hopes to raise public awareness on the laws that govern cyberspace.


MESSAGE BOARD:
Internet: Spam mail

RELATED STORIES:
'Big Brother Awards' highlight privacy complaints
April 12, 1999
Yahoo sues spammer
April 29, 1999
45% of big firms monitor workers
April 21, 1999
Supreme Court upholds 'annoying' CDA provision
April 21, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Is e-mail free speech?
(CIO)
Yahoo sues spammer
(PC World Online)
The truth about e-mail
(The Industry Standard)
Keeping an eye on e-mail
(Network World Fusion)
E-mail: The original 'killer app'
(LinuxWorld)
IDG.net's Year 2000 World
(IDG.net)

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


RELATED SITES:
Intel Corp.
Lawsuit details from Face Intel
Face Intel is a group of former and current Intel employees

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.