advertising information

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

New domain name system creates confusion over ownership

April 26, 1999
Web posted at: 10:58 a.m. EDT (1458 GMT)

by Sandra Gittlen and Denise Pappalardo

From...
Network World Fusion
domain names

(IDG) -- Over the next few months, ISPs such as America Online, AT&T and Verio will begin bundling domain name registrations with their Internet business services. But customers should check the fine print of their contracts to make sure that they retain rights to their online brands if they switch ISPs.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) last week announced that five companies, including America Online, will participate in a test bed for a new domain name registration system designed to end Network Solutions, Inc.'s monopoly. Under the test bed, the new registrars will hook into Network Solutions' database in order to sell a pool of names in the .com, .net and .org domains.

ICANN also unveiled a list of 29 companies, including AT&T and Verio, that will enter the domain game after the test bed is completed in July.

While the announcement sounds the start of competition in this market, it raises a serious question for users: If ISPs offer domain name registration as an add-on to Web services, then who owns the domain?

Currently, users register their domains directly with NSI or through an ISP that then hands the $70 two-year registration fee over to NSI. In either case, NSI recognizes the user as the direct owner of the domain name, which can be used to establish a company's online brand through URLs and e-mail addresses. NSI also lets users switch Web hosts without paying additional fees or losing their brand.

Under the new system, ISPs that have been selected by ICANN can process registrations themselves. Already, ISPs are figuring out ways to offer domain registrations free. For instance, some ISPs will forego passing on to customers the $18 shared database fee owed to NSI if customers choose them to host their Web sites. By bundling in the registration, the lines are blurred about who owns the domain, and it leaves room for ISPs to hold customers hostage by saying the customers lose their domain if they switch ISPs.
MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  Network World Fusion home page
  Free Network World Fusion newsletters
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
 
 
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
  Fusion audio primers
  Computerworld Minute
   

For Deborah Alexander, owner of online Jewish foods distributor Kosher Grocer, this is a scary prospect.

Alexander has switched ISPs twice and is about to switch again. She also is in the process of registering more than a dozen new domains. Alexander says that if her brand were attached to her Web hosting contracts, she would be tied to one provider and not be able to get a better deal.

"The only way this is going to work is if you write into your contract that you own the domain," she says. "Users need to have ownership of their domains. If your domain keeps changing, you'll have no name recognition."

Doug Armentrout, vice president of Web services at Verio, agrees. "Customers should get the details of who owns the domain spelled out in a contract," he says. While Verio plans to hand domains over to users, he says "there are a lot of smaller ISPs out there that will use domain registration as a way to retain customers."

"There is no real benefit to AT&T's customers if we hold ownership of domain names, so I doubt we would do that," says Rose Klimovich, director of IP services at AT&T. But AT&T is still in the process of establishing how it may integrate domain name registration with existing services such as Web hosting, she says.

AOL says it also has not figured out how it will blend in its new role as registrar with its existing services.

ISPs that have been approved as registrars could potentially register a block of domains themselves, then lease them to customers. Armentrout says ICANN should create guidelines to prevent this.

While ICANN has loose suggestions concerning portability of domains, ICANN President Mike Roberts says there is no hard and fast rule by which registrars have to abide.

"ICANN is not going to try to be an umpire in business practices," he says.


RELATED STORIES:
AT&T WorldNet mops up its dial-up mess
March 18, 1999
AT&T struggles to keep WorldNet customers happy
March 9, 1999
ISPs share urge to merge
March 2, 1999
The best national and regional ISPs
February 8, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Domain registration monopoly ends Monday
(Computerworld)
Playing the domain name game
(PC World Online)
Domain-name speculators clog up the registration process
(Network World Fusion)
Network Solutions plays monopoly
(The Industry Standard)
Jonathan B. Postel, Internet pioneer and ICANN mentor
(InfoWorld Electric)

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


RELATED SITES:
ICANN
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Network Solutions, Inc.
America Online, Inc.
Verio, Inc.

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.