advertising information

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

From...
Computerworld

45% of big firms monitor workers

spy

INTERACTIVE

Do you think your company monitors you?

Yes No
View Results

  

April 21, 1999
Web posted at: 11:28 a.m. EDT (1528 GMT)

by Tom Diederich

(IDG) -- If you work at a major corporation, there's a 45% chance your employer is monitoring your e-mail, voice mail, computer files, phone calls or other work-related activities, according to a new report from the American Management Association (AMA).

Last year, 43% of the firms reported keeping tabs on their employees, up from 35% in 1997.

In the most recent survey, when additional forms of eavesdropping are added to the equation -- including security cameras -- the percentage of companies engaged in electronic monitoring and surveillance climbs to 67% compared with 63% in 1997, the AMA said.

The AMA, a nonprofit management-development organization in New York, based the findings on a poll of 1,054 human resources managers conducted by mail in January. The association said the sample mirrored its corporate membership of 10,000 organizations that together employ one-fourth of the U.S. workforce. The survey's margin of error was 3.5%.

The financial sector had the most monitoring, with 68% of companies involved in some form of snooping, followed by business and professional service providers at 51%, and wholesalers and retailers at 47%, the AMA said.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  Computerworld's home page
  Computerworld Year 2000 resource center
  Computerworld's online subscription center
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for IT leaders
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
  Computerworld Minute
  Fusion audio primers
   

Most of the monitoring was performed as spot checks, and 84% of the companies that said they kept a close eye on their employees' activities let them know they're watching, the association added.

But full disclosure isn't enough, according to one critic. Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said the study's results highlight the need for legislation protecting worker rights.

"The Electronic Communications Privacy Act does a fairly good job at protecting privacy for commercial services. For example, if you sign up for America Online, people cannot routinely read your e-mail messages," Rotenberg said. "But when you use an electronic-mail system in the workplace, your privacy is not protected by law -- and that's something that should change."

One problem is that the technology used to track employee behavior is improving rapidly, Rotenberg added. "The Congress has, generally speaking, taken a go-slow approach to privacy. The problem is that the technology is not going slowly," he said.

The depth of the monitoring will increase along with the development of automated tools like complex software filters designed to search for words and send red flags to managers, he said.

Many corporations, though, say they must watch employee actions not only to protect company secrets, but to make sure workers are following the law. Companies worry they'll be open to lawsuits if workers engage in inappropriate behavior on the job.

Because the AMA's corporate members are mostly midsize and large companies, the group said the data didn't accurately reflect policies and practices in the overall U.S. economy, where smaller firms predominate.


RELATED STORIES:
'Big Brother Awards' highlight privacy complaints
April 12, 1999
Protest grows against ID in Intel's PIII
April 12, 1999
EU, United States edge toward data privacy accord
April 9, 1999
Opinion: Technology is increasing privacy, not threatening it
March 8, 1999

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
In Russia: Digital eavesdropping?
(Computerworld)
'Orwell Awards' highlight privacy complaints
(Computerworld)
Who's actually reading your e-mail and what the real threat is
(NetworkWorld Fusion)
Convention exposes hackers' dark underbelly
(NetworkWorld Fusion)
European Union may investigate U.S. global spy computer network
(FCW)

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


RELATED SITES:
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Big Brother Awards
American Management Association (AMA)

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.