advertising information

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

banner

Planning beyond Y2K disruptions

March 15, 1999
Web posted at: 9:23 a.m. EST (1423 GMT)

by Jessica Davis

From...
InfoWorld
y2k

 ALSO:
   The Y2K ripple effect

INTERACTIVE:

Does your company have a post-January 1 contingency plan in place?

Yes No
View Results

  

(IDG) -- Although many companies these days are focusing intensely on year-2000 remediation and testing, experts say peering beyond the Jan. 1 deadline is equally useful in making businesses competitive.

Having a well-stated contingency plan in place when the year changes and some systems fail will give companies a leg up vs. other suppliers or partners that cannot ensure continued operations. And the time to involve IT departments and business managers on contingency planning for year-2000 failures is now.

"Without contingency plans at the business-process level, an organization will enter the new millennium `deaf, dumb, and blind' and will be relying on sheer luck," the Stamford, Conn.-based Gartner Group stated in a recent research note. "Contingency plans can be thought of as an insurance policy that can provide the bridge between an uncertain future and success ... without them, the enterprise's very existence will be in doubt."

Contingency plans should prepare companies for peak failures around the critical year-2000 dates such as Jan. 1, 2000 and the beginning of fiscal years. They should also include plans to prepare for the slow failure of the supply system.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  InfoWorld home page
  InfoWorld forums home page
  InfoWorld Internet commerce section
  Get Media Grok and The Industry Standard Intelligencer delivered for free
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for IT leaders
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
  Fusion audio primers
  Computerworld Minute
   

IT and business project leaders need to look at the process and data-flow diagrams to identify potential points of failure and then plan for manual work-arounds and replacements for automated processes, said Rick Knaggs, practice leader in Year 2000 at DMR Consulting Group, in San Francisco.

"Look at each input, but also look at each decision point," Knaggs said. "What's the plan if you lack the information to make a decision?"

Knaggs also recommended that companies seek legal advice and create a legal strategy. They should also review their contracts to make sure warranty, indemnity, and compliance statements are in order.

Many businesses already have experienced events that called for contingency plans or continuity plans to be put in place. Snowstorms, hurricanes, earthquakes, and other acts of nature are often the cause of business interruption. But the year-2000 computer bug is slightly different, because the resulting problems will happen all over the world and we know exactly when they will happen, experts said.

"There are some things that are unique about Y2K-contingency planning," said Barry Nooryani, an analyst on the year-2000 project management team at BP Amoco, based in London. Nooryani, speaking at a recent year-2000 contingency planning seminar in San Francisco, added, "You can't predict exactly what will happen. The majority of the stuff that will happen will probably come in the first quarter."

Companies can leverage their existing act-of-nature contingency planning for their year-2000 plans.
@2000
Stories:
  • Meaning of the Millennium
  • Y2K: Hype or Hazard?

  • Events Guide:
  • New Year's around the globe

  • Discussion:
  • Stories of the Century
  • Best and Worst

  • Quiz:
  • Know your millennium

  • Links:
  • Celebrations
  • Observatories
  • Y2K Readiness
  • Humor

  • Poll:
    When does the new millennium begin?

    Jan. 1, 2000
    Jan. 1, 2001
    Not sure
    Other
    View Results

    To get ready for potential failures in the business process or supply chain, Nooryani recommended that businesses keep their inventory levels high, look to alternative sources of supply, assess their financial risk position and their cash position, evaluate their staffing levels, and decide how to communicate if critical systems fail.

    "Plan for the extraordinary," Nooryani said.

    One year-2000 manager attending the San Francisco conference said his power supplier would not guarantee that it could supply power on Jan. 1, 2000, and advised the company to look for an alternative source.

    Contingency plans should also be industry-specific, according to Chas Snyder, director of the year-2000 project at Levi Strauss, in San Francisco. Businesses should analyze their own risks.

    "We don't have to worry about product liability," Snyder said. "No one has ever died from a pair of jeans -- that we know of."

    However, Levi Strauss will be working to minimize the business impact of year-2000 failures that occur both inside and outside the company.For example, public fear of year-2000 failures could impact Levi Strauss.

    "People act on fear a lot, and in fear there may be a financial impact," Snyder said. "We don't want people going and buying generators when they should be out buying jeans."

    Levi Strauss is worried about the effect of that fear on its holiday sales in 1999, the time of year when retailers bring in most of their revenue. Having a contingency plan in place will help, at least in part, to allay fears.

    In the Levi Strauss case, and for many IT professionals who have led their company's year-2000 projects, now is the time to step aside and call on the expertise of the business-risk experts.

    "Business cannot abdicate this responsibility," Snyder said. "These are business events. They will affect the business. This can't be slid off onto IT."

    An event-response team should include members from both the IT side and the business side of the company. The team needs to be able to answer questions such as "How does this year-2000 event affect this computer application?" and "How does it affect this business process?"

    Ideally, creators of the contingency plan should report to a business leader, Knaggs said."I don't think contingency planning for Y2K should be led by IT," Knaggs said. "Business owners must decide the `bet the business' cost, risk, and legal trade-offs."

    Critical success factors for year-2000 contingency planning include involving senior management, ensuring adequate funding, and working together with other institutions, Knaggs said.

    To "sell" the idea of creating a contingency plan to business leaders, IT can talk about how such plans can be leveraged down the road to protect business against other interruptions, and can explain that this is not a plan for the end of the world.

    "Most people don't want to think about planning for the worst," Knaggs said. "If you talk about Armageddon, the CEO will look at you and say you're nuts."

    Bringing together IT and business for Y2K planning

    • Stockpile materials
    • Bring service schedules forward
    • Invoice customers early
    • Eliminate credit to high-risk customers
    • Prioritize customers

    Event management for M-Day (millennium day)

    • Prepare war rooms
    • Identify IT swat teams
    • Identify business response teams
    • Establish clear lines of communication
    • Practice drills


    SPECIALS:
    Countdown to 2000
    Y2K Bug: Millennium Mayhem?

    MESSAGE BOARD:
    Year 2000 bug

    RELATED STORIES:
    Opinion: Who's to blame for the Y2K problem?
    March 12, 1999
    Open source guru blames proprietary software for Y2K woes
    March 11, 1999
    Y2K: The hunt for global glitches
    March 10, 1999
    Now for the other Y2K problem: It's a leap year
    March 5, 1999
    TravelGuide - FAA says air traffic control well prepared for Y2K
    March 4, 1999

    RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
    Y2K contingency planning: What if...
    (Civic.com)
    Now's the time to size up Y2K task
    (ComputerWorld)
    IT takes center stage on Y2K
    (InfoWorld Electric)
    Auto suppliers laud Y2K contingency classes
    (ComputerWorld)
    Post-Y2K: Project management key
    (ComputerWorld)

    Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
    External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


    RELATED SITES:
    Gartner Group, Inc.
    BP Amoco p.l.c.
    Levi Strauss & Co.

    Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
    External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

     LATEST HEADLINES:
    SEARCH CNN.com
    Enter keyword(s)   go    help

    Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines.