advertising information

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

From...
PC World

FTC brings more accusations against Intel

intel

March 3, 1999
Web posted at: 8:22 a.m. EST (1322 GMT)

by James Niccolai

(IDG) -- In court filings made public, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission enlarged its antitrust complaint against Intel by charging that the chip maker stifled PC makers' attempts to differentiate their products.

The new allegation doesn't broadly expand the FTC's case, as speculation had suggested, but it is one more point the commission can offer to the administrative law judge who is overseeing the case. The judge will decide whether Intel's actions harmed competition.

The government made the new allegation in a pretrial brief filed with the court last week. But Intel's pretrial brief, also released Monday, claimed that even the FTC's own expert economic witness found no evidence that Intel reduced competition or harmed innovation in the microprocessor market.

The trial is scheduled to begin March 9.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  PC World home page
  FileWorld find free software fast
  Make your PC work harder with these tips
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
    IDG.net's desktop PC page
  IDG.net's portable PC page
  IDG.net's Windows software page
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for computer geniuses (& newbies)
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
  Fusion audio primers
  Computerworld Minute
   

In its original complaint, the FTC said Intel harmed competition when it stopped providing samples of upcoming processors to three companies that rely on them to build Intel-based systems: Compaq, Digital Equipment (acquired by Compaq last year) and Intergraph.

The FTC claims Intel denied the companies the samples in order to force them to license some of their own microprocessor patents on terms favorable to Intel. This harmed competition because companies were less likely to develop new microprocessor technologies for fear they, too, would be coerced into cross-licensing deals with Intel, the FTC contends.

In another incident, Intel persuaded Compaq to drop a patent infringement claim against Packard Bell by threatening to cut off the supply of Intel chips Compaq needed to build PCs, the FTC alleges.

The FTC's 50-page brief also elaborates in its argument that Intel is a monopoly.

Key questions

Experts say that the hardball tactics of which the FTC accuses Intel -- most of which even Intel does not contest -- are not illegal if used by a smaller company. The FTC must show that Intel is a monopoly and thus its behavior is subject to stricter antitrust standards.

Intel's brief cites testimony from the FTC's own economics expert, Frederic Scherer, who acknowledged under attorneys' questioning that he found "no direct evidence" that Intel's actions harmed innovation or price competition in the PC chip business.

Intel offers statements from senior staff at IBM, Compaq, Motorola, Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard, and others saying they did not curtail their research and development of new PC chip technologies because of Intel.

The accusation that Intel prevented OEMs from differentiating their products was first raised by archrival Advanced Micro Devices in a 1997 government regulatory filing, Intel's brief notes. Intel rejected the "AMD-manufactured claim" as a "bizarre theory" that can be discredited by evidence.

If the FTC can't prove Intel harmed competition, its complaint comes down to "subjective notions of 'fairness,'" Intel said in its brief.


MESSAGE BOARD:
Privacy advocates concerned about Pentium III

RELATED STORIES:
Intel claims FTC found no evidence of harm
March 2, 1999
There's life after Merced for 32-bit chips
March 1, 1999
Will PCs outsell TVs in 2000?
February 25, 1999
FTC action won't harm Intel shares
June 5, 1998
AMD, Rise launch new processors
November 18, 1998
Is Intel 'dumping' graphics chips?
June 12, 1998

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Grove, Palmer may testify in FTC-Intel trial
Intel claims FTC found no evidence of harm
Forget the FTC -- Intel's got bigger problems
Intel's defense includes quotes from government witnesses
FTC lodges antitrust complaint against Intel

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


RELATED SITES:
Intel Corp.
AMD Corp.
Federal Trade Commission
The Federal Trade Commission's Antitrust Suit Against Intel

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 LATEST HEADLINES:
SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.