advertising information

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
COMPUTING

Opinion: Microsoft trial resembles TV courtroom drama

January 25, 1999
Web posted at: 1:20 p.m. EST (1820 GMT)

by Dave Kearns, Network World Fusion columnist

From...
Network World Fusion
microsoft
INTERACTIVE:

How closely have you followed the Microsoft trial?

Daily Weekly Monthly Not at all
View Results
  

(IDG) -- I have been a fan of television courtroom drama for many years, so it comes as no surprise that I've been watching the Department of Justice vs. Microsoft antitrust trial and imagining it as a TV show.

Halfway through the proceedings, I'm torn as to how to characterize the players in this drama, especially Microsoft's lawyers. Bill Neukom, John Warden, and especially lead questioner Michael Lacovara appear to go out of their way to alienate and insult the press, the public, the government witnesses and especially Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson. A couple of examples will illustrate what I mean.

First, after the announcement of the purchase of Netscape by America Online, many industry analysts reported the deal as a win for Microsoft. Yet Microsoft's representatives repeatedly tried to paint it as a sign that competition was alive and well. When Judge Jackson said the deal would likely impact the case, Neukom et al. began dancing in the street - convinced, they said, that the judge would now rule in their favor, and perhaps even dismiss the case.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
IDG.net   IDG.net home page
  Network World Fusion home page
 Free registration required to access Network World
  Free Network World Fusion newsletters
  Get Media Grok and The Industry Standard Intelligencer delivered for free
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
    IDG.net's bridges & routers page
  IDG.net's hubs & switches page
    IDG.net's network operating systems page
  IDG.net's network management software page
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you

Instead, Judge Jackson took pains to introduce into evidence (a rare move for any judge) a news report of an interview with AOL's Steve Case, which strongly bolstered the government's contentions about Microsoft's monopoly powers.

Second, Lacovara has almost continuously drawn warnings from Judge Jackson about the length, scope and demeanor of his cross-examination of government witnesses.

For example, rather than questioning final government witness Franklin Fisher about the economics of the marketplace - Fisher's area of expertise - Lacovara kept asking him questions about the inner workings of Java. The lawyer could have asked those questions of Sun's James Gosling, the man who created Java, but instead asked him about economics!

If this were a fictional trial, the tactics of Microsoft's lawyers would already have drawn contempt citations from the judge.

Here in the real world that probably won't happen, but it will likely bring them a loss in this case.

And it's a case Microsoft could have easily stopped with a consent decree heavy on platitudes while short on any actions that would hamper Bill Gates' software empire. How could Microsoft get to be that rich and yet be that dumb?

Dave Kearns, a former network administrator, is a freelance writer and consultant in Austin, Texas.


Message Board:
Special report:
Related stories:
Latest Headlines

Today on CNN

Related IDG.net stories:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window Related sites:

External sites are not
endorsed by CNN Interactive.

SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

  
 

Back to the top
© 2000 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.