advertising information
   personal technology

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

CNN Websites
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines

 message boards




Opinion: Microsoft trial resembles TV courtroom drama

January 25, 1999
Web posted at: 1:20 p.m. EST (1820 GMT)

by Dave Kearns, Network World Fusion columnist

Network World Fusion

How closely have you followed the Microsoft trial?

Daily Weekly Monthly Not at all
View Results

(IDG) -- I have been a fan of television courtroom drama for many years, so it comes as no surprise that I've been watching the Department of Justice vs. Microsoft antitrust trial and imagining it as a TV show.

Halfway through the proceedings, I'm torn as to how to characterize the players in this drama, especially Microsoft's lawyers. Bill Neukom, John Warden, and especially lead questioner Michael Lacovara appear to go out of their way to alienate and insult the press, the public, the government witnesses and especially Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson. A couple of examples will illustrate what I mean.

First, after the announcement of the purchase of Netscape by America Online, many industry analysts reported the deal as a win for Microsoft. Yet Microsoft's representatives repeatedly tried to paint it as a sign that competition was alive and well. When Judge Jackson said the deal would likely impact the case, Neukom et al. began dancing in the street - convinced, they said, that the judge would now rule in their favor, and perhaps even dismiss the case.

  Network World Fusion home page
 Free registration required to access Network World
  Free Network World Fusion newsletters
  Get Media Grok and The Industry Standard Intelligencer delivered for free
 Reviews & in-depth info at's bridges & routers page's hubs & switches page's network operating systems page's network management software page's personal news page
  Questions about computers? Let's editors help you

Instead, Judge Jackson took pains to introduce into evidence (a rare move for any judge) a news report of an interview with AOL's Steve Case, which strongly bolstered the government's contentions about Microsoft's monopoly powers.

Second, Lacovara has almost continuously drawn warnings from Judge Jackson about the length, scope and demeanor of his cross-examination of government witnesses.

For example, rather than questioning final government witness Franklin Fisher about the economics of the marketplace - Fisher's area of expertise - Lacovara kept asking him questions about the inner workings of Java. The lawyer could have asked those questions of Sun's James Gosling, the man who created Java, but instead asked him about economics!

If this were a fictional trial, the tactics of Microsoft's lawyers would already have drawn contempt citations from the judge.

Here in the real world that probably won't happen, but it will likely bring them a loss in this case.

And it's a case Microsoft could have easily stopped with a consent decree heavy on platitudes while short on any actions that would hamper Bill Gates' software empire. How could Microsoft get to be that rich and yet be that dumb?

Dave Kearns, a former network administrator, is a freelance writer and consultant in Austin, Texas.

Message Board:
Special report:
Related stories:
Latest Headlines

Today on CNN

Related stories:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window Related sites:

External sites are not
endorsed by CNN Interactive.

Enter keyword(s)   go    help


Back to the top
© 2000 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.