
CNN WEB SITES: |
|
|
 |

IT pros reap big salary gains
December 1, 1998
Web posted at: 2:00 PM EST
by Lynne Castronuovo and Susan Ellerin
|
From...
|
(IDG) -- You know all the talk you hear about network
professionals commanding top dollar? Believe it.
The 1998 Network World Salary Survey,
co-sponsored by Deloitte Consulting, shows total
compensation went up more than 10% this year from
last - and this in a period of almost zero inflation.
In contrast, the average paycheck rose a modest
3.4% between October 1997 and 1998, according to
the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. And network
staffers still fared better than the average manager or
professional, who brought home an extra 5.3% in pay
between the third quarter of 1997 and 1998.
Take Robert Traversi, a LAN analyst at liquor
distributor Schieffelin and Somerset in New York. The
27-year-old initially got a 5.5% raise this year, but
then netted another 16% when his company merged
with another firm and adjusted pay scales. Traversi
makes $55,000 now and expects to receive a 5% to
10% raise in January.
To help you see how your paycheck stacks up next to
your peers', we surveyed 395 network professionals
and focused on salaries for four different job
categories: senior IT management, network
management, other IT management and IT staff.
Senior management includes titles such as IT manager
and director, vice president and chief information
officer. Network management positions comprise
network, LAN and WAN manager and director.
Other IT management positions include director of the
telecommunications, Internet/intranet, engineering and
help desk departments, while IT staff jobs run the
gamut from engineer to application developer.
Average base salaries range from just under $50,400
for IT staff workers to nearly $68,000 for senior
management. Across titles, more than 40% of IT
professionals earn bonuses, stock and overtime. These
extras typically account for 12% of total
compensation, and sometimes even up to a generous
30% for the most highly paid IT professionals.
Bigger is better
Because the size of a company often affects pay, we
separated respondents into three groups, based on the
total number of employees in their organizations: more
than 1,000; 100 to 999; and less than 100. Most
readers work for profit-oriented companies, although
some work in government, education and other
nonprofit organizations.
Not surprisingly, IT professionals employed by large
companies tend to command higher salaries than their
small business counterparts. For example, network
managers for companies with more than 1,000
employees make about $10,900 more than their peers
in smaller firms.
The number of employees an IT professional
supervises also makes a difference in compensation.
Even within the largest of organizations, network
managers who supervise more than five employees
bring home about $21,000 more than their colleagues
who oversee fewer people.
While network professionals as a whole saw their pay
rise an average 10.1% from last year, bigger
organizations tend to offer more generous raises for
senior IT managers and network managers. However,
in organizations with fewer than 100 employees, other
IT managers and staff workers appear to be
disproportionately highly compensated and receive
extraordinarily high raises on average. Many small
firms don't have an IT department, so perhaps these
employees run the network on their own and are
compensated accordingly.
Mapping out salary
As you would expect, salaries vary from region to
region. This is often a result of an area's cost of living
and job market. However, some variation may be
attributed to differences in company size and titles
represented in the regional sample. To take this into
account, we created regional composites that
essentially leveled the playing field by making each
region compare proportionately to the country as a
whole. These controls led to some interesting results.
Overall, IT professionals in the Mid-Atlantic region of
New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania are the
highest paid, commanding a 13.5% margin above the
national norm. In contrast, pay is lowest in the South
Atlantic area - almost 6% below average.
The fat salaries in the Mid-Atlantic region are no
surprise to Ron Miskie, the founder and chairman of
IT consulting firm Knowledge Transfer International in
New York.
Miskie jokes that he's the only person in his company
who isn't getting a 10% to 15% raise in 1999. Salaries
for his 50 or so employees and 125 consultants who
specialize in Web design, intranets, training and
business analysis are going up because of a tight labor
market in the area.
When it comes to fringe benefits, Miskie says
employees want it all: a good health plan, three to five
weeks of vacation, a pension plan and stock options.
"You have to come up with the whole package now to
compete," he says. Perhaps he should consider
moving his business to the South.
You can't buy loyalty
To see how loyal IT workers are, STAT Resources, a
Boston strategic research and consulting firm, used a
special classification system to divide survey
respondents into one of four groups:
- Seekers - Actively looking for a new position.
- Explorers - Would follow up if they learned
about an interesting job through an
advertisement or another person.
- Approachables - Would consider an
opportunity only if they were personally
contacted.
- Loyalists - Cannot envision changing jobs in the
foreseeable future.
Less than half of survey respondents are actively
exploring job options, but 12% are currently job
hunting. Another 12% are fully committed to their
current employers.
With 26 years of employment at the Federal Aviation
Administration, Robert Wheeler falls into the loyalist
camp. He isn't going anywhere unless something pretty
lucrative comes along. Wheeler, 46, is managing an IT
upgrade to the air traffic control system in Fort Worth,
Texas, an initiative that has already taken two years
and may take another two before it's done.
On the other hand, Matthew Harrison is one survey
respondent who's ready to leave his senior systems
network engineer position at the Federal Home Loan
Bank in Seattle. "I could quit my job today and have a
new job by Tuesday," he says.
Harrison knows this from experience. The
29-year-old has changed jobs three times in the past
four years, but now he's tired of job hopping and is
looking for a place where he can put his feet down
and stay. He recently told his supervisor that he plans
to resign but is giving the bank plenty of time to find his
replacement while he does a careful job search.
In general, the top performers recognize their own
worth and are more likely to classify themselves as
Approachables rather than Loyalists. In today's job
market, the most uniformly valuable employees may
be the ones who are generally happy in their jobs but
are open to be courted by a competitor.
To examine how salary influences loyalty, we found
the median salary for respondents in each of the four
main job categories and grouped them in half based on
their compensation.
Overall, almost two-thirds of the Seekers fell into the
lower compensated halves of their job groups.
However, more than 40% of Loyalists were also
among the lowest paid of their colleagues, a finding
that reinforces the adage "money isn't everything." The
profiles of the single highest and lowest paid
respondents illustrate the typical differences between
Approachables and their less-loyal colleagues.
Indeed, salary isn't a top priority for Schieffelin and
Somerset's Traversi, who says he could easily add
another $25,000 to his $55,000 by joining a Wall
Street firm. "I could go out and get a job in two
seconds if I wanted to," he says.
The 27-year-old would entertain another job offer if
an employer approached him, but the position would
need to offer exciting, challenging opportunities to lure
him away. Most important to him is "the freedom to
do different things in my job."
Traversi also appreciates his current firm's tuition
reimbursement and company-funded training, which he
used to gain HTML, Internet and WAN skills.
Besides, Traversi has a two-hour commute from Long
Island to Manhattan, so he's not keen on a job that
would require him to return to the office at all hours to
put out fires.
And while Federal Home Loan Bank's Harrison is
looking for a new job, money isn't at the top of his list
either. Based on his experience in the job market, he
says that if a job offer appears too good to be true, it
probably is. If a company is offering a sky-high salary
and a huge bonus, that might be a tip-off the company
has internal management problems and has trouble
keeping people.
Harrison makes $60,000 per year with another
$10,000 in bonuses. "I'm looking for professional
growth," he says. Beyond that, he wants to work
some place with good management and a cohesive
working environment.
Perception vs. reality
Few people in the lower end of the salary bracket
have rosy illusions - the vast majority of those who
earn below median salaries believe they are, in fact,
being paid less than their peers.
However, those who are paid well compared to their
counterparts are far less in touch with reality. Almost
half of the network professionals who earn more than
the median figure for their peers in similar-sized
organizations believe they're underpaid. And the
respondents with such beliefs are twice as likely to be
seeking new jobs. For such employees, perception -
especially negative perception - is obviously more
important than reality. Perhaps showing them this
article may help you convey to them that they're being
paid fairly.
In addition to salary, benefits are another important
factor in the overall compensation equation. The
benefits of greatest importance to respondents across
job titles are family health insurance, flexible work
schedules and dental insurance.
Interestingly, some benefits are more important than
others depending on professionals' loyalty to their
employers.
On the whole, Loyalists are twice as likely to regard
health insurance as important. In contrast, Seekers and
Explorers are more likely to regard tuition
reimbursement as critical. Otherwise, benefits are
rated fairly consistently by IT professionals, regardless
of their relative pay, loyalty or title.
1999 expectations
Despite the fat raises network professionals have
earned over the past two years, expectations for 1999
are more modest. After all, predictions are a crap
shoot and respondents probably don't want to set
themselves up for disappointment.
Across the board, professionals expect their total
compensation to increase by about 6.5%. Senior IT
managers are slightly more optimistic, pegging their
predicted raises at just more than 7%.
Schieffelin and Somerset's Traversi expects to get a
5% to 10% raise next year. As for the FAA's
Wheeler, he says his salary is determined by a
complex federal formula. Because he's in the midst of
a title change, he's not sure what kind of a raise he'll
be getting.
Stuart Helm, a LAN operations team leader at
building and industrial manufacturer Masonite in West
Chicago, Ill., says the workers he supervises will
receive 2% to 4% raises in 1999, which is about the
same as 1998. He points out that raises in
manufacturing tend to be smaller than in other fields.
Obviously, IT professionals at Knowledge Transfer
International are slightly more fortunate, and Miskie no
doubt hopes they are grateful.
Castronuovo is research manager and Ellerin is president of STAT Resources, a Boston strategic research and consulting firm that assists clients with improving the quality of their service delivery systems, products and customer and employee communications. STAT can be reached at www. stat-resources.com. Neal Weinberg, Network World's features reporter, also contributed to this article.
Related stories:
|
Latest Headlines
Today on CNN
|
Related IDG.net stories:
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
Related sites:
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
|
|