ad info

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
   computing
   personal technology
   space
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
Computing

From...

Can iMac toast the PC?

August 18, 1998
Web posted at: 3:00 PM EDT

by David Essex and Paul Heltzel

(IDG) -- Apple Computer says its low-cost iMac, which debuted this weekend, is 40 percent faster than systems based on Intel's 400-MHz Pentium II processor. The hype-heavy iMac uses a 233-MHz Motorola PowerPC, or G3, processor, which Apple says outperforms the fastest PC available. But analysts and benchmark experts say that claim may not present a full picture.

Nathan Brookwood, microprocessor analyst at Dataquest, warns that Apple's benchmark numbers, based on BYTE magazine's BYTEMark tests of raw CPU speed, "seem a little out of line to me." Brookwood says results he obtained from IBM and Intel based on tests from the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation do not support Apple's claim.

Benchmark debate

Extrapolating from the SPEC numbers (which measure raw processing power) for a faster 300-MHz G3 processor, Brookwood determined that the iMac's processor might at best achieve a 10.3 rating for CPU integer operations, and 6.6 on floating-point operations. In these tests Intel's Pentium II-400 shows better performance, rating 15.8 and 11.4, respectively. (Integer operations predominate in software that emphasizes data movement, such as databases and word processors; floating-point is important in math-intensive programs such as 3D games and graphics software.)

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
  IDG.net home page
  PC World home page
  FileWorld find free software fast
  Make your PC work harder with these tips
 Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
    IDG.net's desktop PC page
  IDG.net's portable PC page
  IDG.net's Windows software page
  IDG.net's personal news page
  Questions about computers? Let IDG.net's editors help you
  Subscribe to IDG.net's free daily newsletter for computer geniuses (& dummies too)
  Search IDG.net in 12 languages
 News Radio
  Fusion audio primers
  Computerworld Minute
   

Since SPEC testing is typically used to measure the performance of UNIX workstations, Will Swearingen, strategic marketing manager for PowerPC at Motorola, suggests that those tests don't correlate to real-world performance. "If you're looking to gauge PC systems performance you would want to use the BYTEMark tests," argues Swearingen. "It's not just a random benchmark. The G3 outperforms the fastest PC in the Wintel space."

Truth in benchmarking?

What kicked off all this hoopla? This statement: "The iMac for $1299 toasts the fastest PC money can buy at any price--the Pentium II-400." That quote from Steve Jobs, Apple's interim CEO, was included in an August 13 Apple press release.

A similar assertion about Power Macs sparked bitter controversy last April that saw Intel discrediting Apple's claims. BYTE, which suspended publication in May, posted a FAQ on its Web site explaining that the Power Mac had superior performance on a particular type of integer test. The magazine noted that the Pentium II bested the Power Mac on some other tests that employ full-blown applications to test other subsystems such as storage. It cited differences in software compilers as another factor in the Power Mac's ability to run the test faster.

According to Intel spokesperson Seth Walker the company "doesn't comment on other people's product's directly." He did however debate the merits of using one measure to access the performance of a PC.

Bill Rinko-Gay, PC World's Network Test Center Director, points out that a more complete picture would be gained by also using application-based testing that shows how quickly common tasks are accomplished. "Benchmarks don't work your computer the way you work your computer," said Rinko-Gay. "There are some applications in which the G3 is a faster processor. But your PC isn't just a processor. It really comes down to this: How fast can you do your daily work?" That can be determined only by testing with applications.

Related stories:
Latest Headlines

Today on CNN

Related IDG.net stories:

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window Related sites:

External sites are not
endorsed by CNN Interactive.

SEARCH CNN.com
Enter keyword(s)   go    help

  
 

Back to the top
© 2000 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.