Surfing Silicon Valley: 56K -- Not!
By San Francisco Bureau Chief Greg Lefevre
April 9, 1998
Web posted at: 2:20 PM EDT (1420 GMT)
(CNN)
-- Are you reading this at 56k? Even though there's a modem marked 56k
nestled inside your computer or hanging off the back of your desk, you're
probably not getting the getting the baud rate that you expect. There's
nothing wrong with your PC or Mac or even with your modem, the problem
is that most of America's phone lines haven't caught up with the technology
used by 3Com/US Robotics, Hayes or the folks at Global Village.
Way back when modern modem standards were set, your modem was instructed
to run at its fastest available speed. If the line quality was not up
to par, the modem would slow down to the next slower speed, then the
next, until it received enough error-free information.
That worked fine up to 28,800 bits per second. Then the dueling 56k
standards were devised. First off, the 56k happens in one direction
only -- albeit the important one, inbound to your computer. And it's
usually 52k anyway.
Problem 1
The modem designers counted on something that's not happened: higher
quality phone lines. Zooming along at 56,000 bits per second requires
very clean connections. It also requires a minimum of switching by the
phone company between your computer and your Internet service provider.
In layman's terms, if your phone call/dialup goes through more than
one analog to digital conversion between your modem and the ISP, the
56k signal will likely drop off and your modem speed drops down. You'll
wind up at 34k or more likely 28k.
The new 90v standard is supposed to bridge the two 56k standards and
meet the challenge of standard phone lines. Meanwhile the telephone
companies are splitting up area codes faster than Hollywood marriages,
trying to get all of that second or third phone-line business for home
computer connections.
Problem 2
Divvying up the area codes gives us more numbers but does not necessarily
change the way the signals are moved around.
Solutions
Some folks are coming up with interim answers. Intel is touting a
compression service that sends you tightly compressed graphics. That
way when you call up a graphics-laden page, it loads faster because
there are fewer bits in it.
Also, Connectix Surf Express, mentioned in an earlier column, stores
your favorite graphic elements so that the next time you go to a familiar
page, it will load any repeat graphics or pictures from your hard drive,
not consuming time reloading them from the Web. All of this is intended
to make the process faster.
If you're lucky enough to have a high-speed line like a T-1 or a cable
modem or even satellite service like DirectPC, all of this is moot.
Invite us all over so we can witness what the Web SHOULD be like!
Surf on ...