|
Monday, March 24, 2008
Aging eyes
by Val Willingham
Medical Producer I have a passion for reading: books, magazines, even catalogs, you name it. And I never had a tough time following the fine print, until I got into my 40s. I just couldn't see up close. Although I had been wearing glasses since I was in sixth grade, all of a sudden, the words were out of focus. When I finally went to the eye doctor, he prescribed (here comes the dreaded word, most middle-age people hate to hear): Bifocals! Editor's Note: Medical news is a popular but sensitive subject rooted in science. We receive many comments on this blog each day; not all are posted. Our hope is that much will be learned from the sharing of useful information and personal experiences based on the medical and health topics of the blog. We encourage you to focus your comments on those medical and health topics and we appreciate your input. Thank you for your participation.
I am 53 and I had Intralase done on March 14, 2008. My eyes are healthy with no signs of disease. The preop eye exam was probably the best I've ever had. The surgery took 5 minutes, tops.
The next morning, my distance vision was 20/15 and closeup was 20/20. My eyes looked really bad and I will say the first 8 hours or so was very painful. Worse than major abdominal surgery. I don't understand why they didn't give me something for pain. I do have the halos when I drive at night. It's like driving with really dirty glasses on. The other challenge for me has been relearning to focus my eyes. My glasses had been doing that for me since I was 8. My vision overall is very good. I can see better than I did with glasses. Fewer blindspots. I was very photophobic before surgery and that seems to have improved. I'm glad I had the surgery. For the first time in my life, I have some cool shades!
I had Lasik in my early 40ties. I'm almost 55. I was extremely near-sighted and my vision is still 20/25 in one eye and 20/30 in my other. However, I had astigmatism which has come back in both eyes. For me, it was worth it because my vision was so bad and I couldn't tolerate contacts after my 30ties. Now, I only wear prescription reading glasses. The negative was it really aggravated my dry eyes and I think it makes my night vision worse. Also, your vision isn't as crisp as eyeglasses made it. So, there are trade-offs.
LASIK was the worst decision of my life. Since I had LASIK I have spent much of my spare time researching LASIK complications. The medical literature and FDA clinical trials report that chronic dry eyes and night vision impairment occur frequently after LASIK. The rate of these complications is actually very high. Moreover, the LASIK flap only heals to 2% of the cornea's original tensile strength, and the biomechanical strength of the cornea is permanently reduced by about 50% after LASIK. LASIK patients face problems with glaucoma screening and future cataract surgery. You can read more about LASIK risks and long-term complications on my website at www.lasikcomplications.com
Lasik depression after lasik.
Had lasik about 2 years ago and I suffer every day because of lasik. Glasses gave me 20/15 crisp clean vision far and near under any light condition, now I have double vision, severe glare and light sensitivity,severe starbursts,contrast loss,dry eyes and bad night vision.Having lasik done was the biggest mistake of my life.
I am a 52 year old female and went into these procedures with healthy eyes. My goal was to have the best of both worlds, distance and reading however, i am not sure that can truly happen and may end up choosing distance. Had lasik 3 times and PRK last June. The doctor is still trying to stabilize my vision with Steroid drops. It seems when I stop the drops my vision reverses to what it previously was but I am still hopeful. My first lasik was 6 years ago so I have still had the benefit of no glasses for that amount of time - If I could get my vision to stabilize, I would be happy - might need a 5th go at this (depending on my eyes) but that is yet to be determined. No real regrets.
When I was in my early teens I began wearing glasses to correct nearsightedness. Being a vain teenager I really hated the idea of wearing glasses. The Dr. at that time persuaded me to use them when I really needed them, to see the board at school and eventually to drive. He said if I did not wear them all the time eventually my eyes would get better as I got into my thirties and that I likely would not need reading glasses as I got into middle age. Well he was right. My vision did get better and by the time I got into my late thirties I did not need glasses. I'll be 53 this year and I've never developed the need for reading glasses either.
My Aunt was told that she had fast growing cataracts on one eye and was sent immediately for surgery to remove them. Her other eye had the beginning of cataracts. They decided within a month of the first surgery to remove them. Her vision now is very poor. They did some laser treatments, but her better than perfect vision has been substantially reduced. She had not even noticed any problems with her vision before the surgeries and now she is having major problems with her vision. We've been told by some that the cataracts may have been removed too soon.
We have a number of customers who, following corrctive laser eye surgery, have been recommended ready to wear reading glasses. Obviously their distance vision has been suitably corrected but reading and close work is another matter. It would seem however that if directed by your surgeon, in certain cicumstances simple magnification would suffice.
I had the new intralase LASIK in 2006. Since then, my life has changed but almost completely for the worst. I have spent over $15,000 in seeing eye MD's and purchasing prescription and OTC eye drops since my LASIK. The statistics are skewed.
Many people who have less than good outcomes will claim that they would do it again and/or would recommend it to others. Fortunately or not, I can't be like them. Instead, I am well aware that my LASIK outcome was poor. There are various degrees of dry eyes (mild, moderate, and severe). If you have moderate or severe dry eyes, there are very poor solutions. Dry eyes are common post-LASIK and worsen with age. If I had known just that alone, it would have been enough to keep me away from LASIK.
I had Lasik in 2006 to correct a minor case of myopia. It corrected my vision to 20/20, but there were side effects. I developed dry eyes, which have improved quite a bit, but it's taken me over 18 months to get to this point; the dry eye condition is now a lingering nuisance. I developed floaters in my field of vision. They're very transparent, but numerous; they're annoying. I had major halos and light sensitivity in the first few months, but it's been reduced to a very minor condition. I can drive at night. Still, these annoyances (slight dry eyes, floaters, slight light sensitivity) bother me. Honestly, I wish I had not had it done. If you're very picky about your eyesight, and you're not a risk-taker, then maybe Lasik isn't for you.
|
ABOUT THE BLOG
Get a behind-the-scenes look at the latest stories from CNN's chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and the CNN Medical Unit producers. They'll share news and views on health and medical trends -- info that will help you take better care of yourself and the people you love.
PREVIOUS POSTS
• Sleep well• Vacation souvenir: A low hospital bill • The air we breathe • The myths of Autism • Minding your knees as you age • Young men and the HPV vaccine • Parents in vaccine case still see good in shots • Vaccines and autism • Would you get weight-loss surgery? • Keeping your heart healthy at every age ARCHIVE
• November 2006• December 2006 • January 2007 • February 2007 • March 2007 • April 2007 • May 2007 • June 2007 • July 2007 • August 2007 • September 2007 • October 2007 • November 2007 • December 2007 • January 2008 • February 2008 • March 2008 |


