CNNin
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 LOCAL
 POLITICS
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 AIDS
 Alternative
 Cancer
 Diet & Fitness
 Heart
 Men
 Seniors
 Women
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 CNN programs
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
  Bioethics in Brief

Genetic Testing: The Future is Here

by Jeffrey P. Kahn, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Director, Center for Bioethics
University of Minnesota
Center for Bioethics

Related CNN stories:
  • Swiss voters reject curbs on genetic engineering - June 7, 1998
  • Researchers: Gene found for heart failure - April 30, 1998
  • Lawyer: New DNA tests point to killer in Sheppard case - March 5, 1998


  • Every week seems to bring another announcement of genetic discovery about one or more diseases, and with each discovery comes the promise of soon to be developed genetic tests. These tests offer information about who is likely to develop cancer or other diseases, and the scientific breakthroughs that make these tests possible are remarkable. But the information offered by such tests offers limited benefit, and may in fact cause more harm than good.

    Genetic risk is no sure thing

    All but a few of the genetic tests now available don't actually predict whether or not a person will contract a disease or condition, but instead offer much more limited information about how much more likely they are to develop a disease compared to someone who tests "normal."

    This kind of information is not very useful for individuals, who would like to know whether they actually have or will get a particular disease, and what steps, if any, they ought to take to protect their health. But probabilities are very useful for predicting how many people in a group will contract cancer or Alzheimer's disease, and so insurance companies and potential employers will be very interested in measuring their risks using genetic tests.

    Guilt by association

    The genetic codes that will be used in tests to predict health risks often are first identified by research on particular groups. For example, research on women of Jewish ancestry from Eastern Europe, led to tests that predict increased breast cancer risk in women with the certain genes. This discovery and others like it point to only a few of what are probably many genetic defects that influence the development of diseases such as cancer, and it is only because of the genetic usefulness of members of a population that their "defects" are catalogued first.

    But being first is double-edged. Members of the group are the first to gain access to more information about future health risks and to be able to seek early testing and treatment. But they also are the first to have the information used against them -- for instance, to determine eligibility and premiums for insurance or to draw broad conclusions about whether or not they are healthy.

    Tests but no therapies

    Lastly, one of the promises of genetic technology has been the development of gene therapy: medical techniques that correct the genetic coding that predisposes us to disease. These types of cures now seem as far off as ever, however, considering recent reports that pharmaceutical companies are shying away from developing them. The relatively small number of affected people whose genetic diseases could be cured by gene therapy means there is limited financial incentive to develop them.

    Genetic information will grow as a powerful tool to help understand the causes of disease and illness. But in many cases this is power to predict our futures without offering us anything to alter it. Whether or not any of us would like to know what future our genes hold for us, it is up to us to decide whether that information should be collected, and more important, who should be able to see and use it.

    Until there are therapies to go along with them, genetic tests should be offered only by highly trained geneticists or genetic counselors, and results should be treated in much the same way as HIV test results-as potentially discriminatory and stigmatizing information.



    "Genetic Testing: The Future is Here"
    is the first part of an on-going series on genetics issues.




    Visit the "Ethics Matters" Archive where you'll find other columns from Jeffrey Kahn on a wide range of bioethics topics.


    "Ethics Matters" is a bi-monthly feature from the
    Center for Bioethics and CNN Interactive.

    SEARCH CNN.com
    Enter keyword(s)   go    help

    Back to the top
    © 2000 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
    Terms under which this service is provided to you.
    Read our privacy guidelines.